Başkent Üniversitesi Yayınları

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/13092

Browse

Filters

2010 - 20113

Settings

search.filters.applied.f.language: search.filters.language.enSubject: search.filters.subject.Survival

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Long-term Outcomes After Third Liver Transplant
    (Başkent Üniversitesi, 2011-04) Taner, C. Burcin; Nguyen, Justin H.; Kramer, David J.; Harnois, Denise M.; Shine, Timothy S. J.; Canabal, Juan M.; Rosser, Barry G.; Keaveny, Andrew P.; Willingham, Darrin L.; Balci, Deniz
    Objectives: Orthotopic liver transplant is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage liver disease. Patients with first graft failure requiring liver retransplant are commonly seen at most liver transplant centers. However, patients with a second graft failure requiring a third graft are uncommon. Liver retransplant in this setting has only been pursued at a few large transplant centers. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the long-term outcomes of recipients who underwent 3 or more orthotopic liver transplants. Between February 1998 and August 2009, 24 patients had 3 or more orthotopic liver transplants at the Mayo Clinic in Florida. Results: Mean patient survival was 103.8 months for the study cohort. Actuarial patient survival after the last orthotopic liver transplant in -1, -5, and -10 years was 60%, 40%, 33%. Patients were transplanted with lower donor risk index score grafts in each subsequent orthotopic liver transplant. Patients who had a graft with a donor risk index score > 1.6 at the time of the third orthotopic liver transplant had significantly lower survival rate compared with those with grafts with a donor risk index score ≤ 1.6. Conclusions: Multiple liver retransplants offer acceptable patient survival. Each transplant program must decide whether to do multiple orthotopic liver transplants based on the program’s transplant volume and outcomes to help this subgroup of patients. The concerns of potentially decreasing access to first time orthotopic liver transplant candidates should also be weighed in the decision to move forward.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Conversion From Cyclosporine to Sirolimus in Chronic Renal Allograft Dysfunction: A 4-Year Prospective Study
    (Başkent Üniversitesi, 2011-02) Han, Fei; Chen, Jianghua; Wang, Huiping; Wang, Suya; Wang, Yimin; He, Qiang; Zhang, Xiaohui; Huang, Hongfeng; Wu, Jianyong
    Objectives: The long-term use of cyclosporine always contributes to chronic renal allograft dysfunction. Converting from cyclosporine to sirolimus and reducing cyclosporine dosage under high mycophenolate mofetil levels are 2 common therapies. Their efficacy and safety have not been compared in Chinese patients. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, open-label, randomized study, 51 kidney recipients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were enrolled. Patients in the sirolimus group (n=22) initiated sirolimus 12 hours after cessation of cyclosporine. Patients in the cyclosporine group (n=29) significantly reduced cyclosporine dosage under high mycophenolate mofetil dosages. Both groups were followed-up for 4 years. Results: The baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 36.46 ± 6.22 mL/min/1.73 m2 in sirolimus group and 36.07 ± 6.18 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the cyclosporine group (P = NS). In cyclosporine group, the estimated glomerular filtration rate declined significantly at 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 months after inclusion compared with baseline, and was lower than the sirolimus group at 30, 36, 42, and 48 months after inclusion (P < .05). As for the endpoints of graft loss and return to dialysis, the 4-year graft survival was 77.3% in the sirolimus group and 55.2% in the cyclosporine group (P = NS). As for the endpoint of serum creatinine doubling, 4-year survival was 77.3% in the sirolimus group and 41.4% in the cyclosporine group (P < .05). Three patients in sirolimus group (2 acute rejections, 1 pneumonia) and 2 patients in the cyclosporine group (owing to acute rejection) dropped out (P = NS). Conclusions: Conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus could improve long-term survival of renal grafts in Chinese patients.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Role of Generics in Kidney Transplant: Mycophenolate Mofetil 500 Versus Mycophenolate: 2-Year Results
    (Başkent Üniversitesi, 2010-12) Abdallah, Taieb Ben; Kheder, Adel; Abderrahim, Ezzeddine; Bacha, Med Mongi; Mhibik, Sonia; Karoui, Cyrine; Helal, Imed; Cherif, Mejda; Ounissi, Mondher
    Objectives: The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil has proven itself effective in preventing acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. However, this cost is ineffective with countries with a limited income. This study sought to compare the clinical and therapeutic profiles of a generic formulation with mycophenolate mofetil. Materials and Methods: This 2-year, single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study investigated the efficacy and safety of a new mycophenolate mofetil generic formulation compared with mycophenolate renal transplant recipients. The study divided patients in 2 groups: 8 patients in G1 received mycophenolate mofetil 500 and 10 patients in G2 received mycophenolate. Their demographics were similar: mean age, 36.6±7.1 and 33.3±11.7 years; sex M/F: 2/6 and 5/5; mean donor age, 42.6±11.1 and 43.6±13.9 years; mean HLA mismatches, 2.7±1.2 and 3.3±1.5; deceased donors, 25% and 20%; and warm ischemia time, 40.2±11.9 and 38.7±10.5 minutes. All patients received 2 g daily of mycophenolate mofetil 500 or mycophenolate with initial dosage of 0.1 mg/kg/d and prednisolone. Results: One patient of 7 in the mycophenolate mofetil group and 4 of 6 in the mycophenolate group had 1 episode of acute tubular necrosis, and 1 patient in each group had an acute rejection with no significant differences between the groups. The area under the curve of the mycophenolate mofetil did not show any difference between the 2 groups. The values of serum creatinine were also comparable. Patient survival rate at 6, 12, and 24 months was 100% in the groups. The frequencies of digestive and hematologic adverse effects were comparable in the groups with no significant differences. Conclusions: Use of mycophenolate mofetil 500 provided safe and effective immunosuppressive therapy compared with mycophenolate. However, as the duration of the study was short, these results need to be confirmed in a long-term study.