Ticari Bilimler Fakültesi / Faculty of Commercial Science

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/2074

Browse

Filters

20152

Settings

search.filters.applied.f.language: search.filters.language.tursearch.filters.applied.f.rights: search.filters.rights.info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Bibliometric Profiles of Studies on Organization Theory in Turkey: Periodic Comparison of Cite Networks
    (2015) Kirkbesoglu, Erdem; Sozen, H. Cenk; Kurt, Esra; 0000-0002-6781-9753; ABI-3973-2020
    The purpose of this study is to determine relational links via documents and to have an impression about the development of organization theory in Turkey by using bibliometric methods. Studies of various researchers have been considered with a longditutional approach.The papers which had been presented in National Management and Organization Congress within 10 years were examined in terms of most cited theories, authors, research topics and academic journals. The data were also used for social network analyses to examine interactions between universities, research topics and authors.The data were examined under two periods consist of five years. Findings show that there is a variation between two periods and work style have been transferred to newly founded universities or PhD programs in these universities.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Paradox Between Institutional Logics in Organizational Fields: The Case of Turkish Military Service Field
    (2015) Kalemci, Rabia Arzu; Gokoglu, Mustafa Mehmet; Tuzun, Ipek Kalemci; 0000-0002-2617-2666; 0000-0001-6979-2040; ABC-2318-2020; ABB-5350-2020
    Turkish military services field can be conceptualized for embracing two distinct and inconsistent types of institutional logics, namely; mandatory military service logic as the dominant and pragmatic logics as the alternatives. We examine the relationship between the dominant logic which determines legitimate organizational activities and alternative logics which are activated sporadically in the field of Turkish military services. From this standpoint, the circumstances whereby pragmatic logics as alternative institutional logics become effective in the field without devitalizing the dominant logic is explored. Broadly, the results indicate that dominant and alternative logics can support each other in order to preserve field's static condition, rather than interfere with each other so as to induce a permanent transformation.