Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers

dc.contributor.authorEren, Birgul
dc.contributor.authorOzasir, Tufan
dc.contributor.authorKandemir, Baris
dc.contributor.authorGulsahi, Kamran
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-2250en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-9005en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-7265en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID34725637en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T07:01:41Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T07:01:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThis study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension and length, were selected. The teeth in each experimental group (n = 10) were instrumented, obturated, and restored with the following procedures: in group 1, AH Plus root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; in group 2, AH Plus root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem; in group 3, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; and in group 4, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem. The specimens were placed on a universal test machine. The fracture resistance of all specimens was tested using generic test equipment, and the value of the force in newton (N) during fracture was measured for each root. A statistical analysis was conducted through the Kruskal-Wallis test as well as the post hoc test. The tests showed a significant difference between groups 2 and 3, with group 3 producing load values that were significantly higher than group 2. In contrast, no significant differences were found to exist between the other groups. Regardless of postsystems, groups 3 and 4 showed higher mean fracture values (but no statistically significant differences) than groups 1 and 2.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2314-6133en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118687884en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/10573
dc.identifier.wos000884752500002en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1155/2021/3818652en_US
dc.relation.journalBIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONALen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBOND STRENGTHen_US
dc.subjectFAILURE MODEen_US
dc.subjectPOSTen_US
dc.subjectSYSTEMSen_US
dc.titleComparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealersen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: