Three Different Points of View in Stroke Rehabilitation: Patient, Caregiver, and Physiotherapist

dc.contributor.authorDemir, Yasemin Parlak
dc.contributor.authorBalci, Nilay Comuk
dc.contributor.authorUnluer, Nezehat Ozgul
dc.contributor.authorUlug, Naime
dc.contributor.authorDogru, Esra
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Muhammed
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Sibel Aksu
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Oznur
dc.contributor.pubmedID25823910en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAP-4292-2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-14T08:57:09Z
dc.date.available2023-12-14T08:57:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractBackground: The similarities or differences of the threesome (physiotherapists, patients, and caregivers) thought about the process of stroke rehabilitation can play a key role in the success of rehabilitation. Objective: The aim of this qualitative study was to investigate the perspectives of the threesome, with regard to the two themes of the study: (1) What are the problems faced by the patients after stroke?; and (2) What does recovery after stroke mean to you? Methods: The qualitative questions and possible answers were prepared by four physiotherapists. The answers were matched to International Classification of Functioning (ICF) components. Seventy patients who were having treatment as in-patient rehabilitation centers, their caregivers, and physiotherapists were invited to the study. After the questions were asked and the possible response choices were presented, subjects were asked to prioritize these response choices. Results: One hundred and fifty-nine subjects, including 53 patients, 53 caregivers, and 53 physiotherapists, were included to the study. When the theme 1 were examined, we found that the patients' first priority was functional abilities (ICF: body function and structure) such as using the hands and feet while the caregivers and physiotherapists prioritized self-care problems (ICF: activity and participation). The most common response to the theme 2 was "being in same health condition before the disease'' (ICF: activity and participation) among the patients and caregivers and "being able to move arm and leg on the affected side'' (body function and structure) among the physiotherapists. Conclusion: As a conclusion, problems faced by the patients, caregivers, and physiotherapists were perceived under the same ICF domain and that caregivers' and physiotherapists' priorities were the same.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1945-5119en_US
dc.identifier.endpage385en_US
dc.identifier.issn1074-9357en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84956571825en_US
dc.identifier.startpage377en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/11094
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.wos000362838400009en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000042en_US
dc.relation.journalTOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectStroke rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectInternational Classification of Functioning (ICF)en_US
dc.subjectPatient's and caregiver's prioritiesen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapisten_US
dc.titleThree Different Points of View in Stroke Rehabilitation: Patient, Caregiver, and Physiotherapisten_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: