Maxillary Expansion Via Palatal Mini-Implants: A Preliminary Study

dc.contributor.authorArman-Ozcirpici, Ayca
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Alev
dc.contributor.authorPolat-Ozsoy, Omur
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-18T12:00:36Z
dc.date.available2024-03-18T12:00:36Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study evaluates the skeletal and dental effects of a mini-implant supported maxillary expansion (MISME) appliance that applied forces directly to the maxilla. Materials and Method: Records of 9 patients (5 female and 4 male patients; mean age = 12 years 8 months) with indications of maxillary expansion were included in this study. After insertion of four miniscrews (1.6 mm in diameter, 7 mm in length), an acrylic expansion device was bonded on the screws. Two miniscrews were placed in the anterior palate bilaterally, 3-4 mm lateral to the suture and 3-4 mm posterior to the incisive foramen. Two miniscrews were placed bilaterally between the second premolar and first molar roots in the palatal alveolus. The MISME appliance was activated with a semi-rapid protocol until the desired expansion was achieved. The average treatment duration was 97.1 +/- 62.2 days. Measurements from cephalometric, posteroanterior radiographs and dental casts taken before and after expansion were evaluated statistically. The nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used for not normally distributed parameters (i.e., Nperp-A), and the parametric paired t test was performed for normally distributed parameters. A finding of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Forward movement of the maxilla (p<0.05) as well as an increase in nasal and maxillary skeletal and dental widths (p<0.001) were observed in the sample group. Maxillary intermolar, intercanine, and palatal widths also increased (p<0.001) without buccal tipping of molars. A slight posterior rotation of the mandible was seen. Dentoalveolar measurements did not show any significant changes. Conclusion: The MISME appliance showed successful expansion of the maxilla without such side effects as buccal tipping of molars and bite opening. This appliance, which provides parallel expansion, can be a simple and economic alternative to transpalatal distraction.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage27en_US
dc.identifier.issn2528-9659en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage16en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/11854
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wos000439301100003en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.13076/TJO-D-13-00010en_US
dc.relation.journalTURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary expansionen_US
dc.subjectMini-implanten_US
dc.subjectPalatal implanten_US
dc.subjectSkeletal anchorageen_US
dc.titleMaxillary Expansion Via Palatal Mini-Implants: A Preliminary Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: