Maxillary Expansion Via Palatal Mini-Implants: A Preliminary Study
dc.contributor.author | Arman-Ozcirpici, Ayca | |
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, Alev | |
dc.contributor.author | Polat-Ozsoy, Omur | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-18T12:00:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-18T12:00:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: This study evaluates the skeletal and dental effects of a mini-implant supported maxillary expansion (MISME) appliance that applied forces directly to the maxilla. Materials and Method: Records of 9 patients (5 female and 4 male patients; mean age = 12 years 8 months) with indications of maxillary expansion were included in this study. After insertion of four miniscrews (1.6 mm in diameter, 7 mm in length), an acrylic expansion device was bonded on the screws. Two miniscrews were placed in the anterior palate bilaterally, 3-4 mm lateral to the suture and 3-4 mm posterior to the incisive foramen. Two miniscrews were placed bilaterally between the second premolar and first molar roots in the palatal alveolus. The MISME appliance was activated with a semi-rapid protocol until the desired expansion was achieved. The average treatment duration was 97.1 +/- 62.2 days. Measurements from cephalometric, posteroanterior radiographs and dental casts taken before and after expansion were evaluated statistically. The nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used for not normally distributed parameters (i.e., Nperp-A), and the parametric paired t test was performed for normally distributed parameters. A finding of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Forward movement of the maxilla (p<0.05) as well as an increase in nasal and maxillary skeletal and dental widths (p<0.001) were observed in the sample group. Maxillary intermolar, intercanine, and palatal widths also increased (p<0.001) without buccal tipping of molars. A slight posterior rotation of the mandible was seen. Dentoalveolar measurements did not show any significant changes. Conclusion: The MISME appliance showed successful expansion of the maxilla without such side effects as buccal tipping of molars and bite opening. This appliance, which provides parallel expansion, can be a simple and economic alternative to transpalatal distraction. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2528-9659 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 16 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11727/11854 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000439301100003 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.13076/TJO-D-13-00010 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Maxillary expansion | en_US |
dc.subject | Mini-implant | en_US |
dc.subject | Palatal implant | en_US |
dc.subject | Skeletal anchorage | en_US |
dc.title | Maxillary Expansion Via Palatal Mini-Implants: A Preliminary Study | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: