Bintrafusp Alfa With CCRT Followed by Bintrafusp Alfa Versus Placebo With CCRT Followed by Durvalumab in Patients With Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: A Phase 2 Randomized Study

dc.contributor.authorVokes, Everett E.
dc.contributor.authorMornex, Francoise
dc.contributor.authorSezer, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Ying
dc.contributor.authorFang, Jian
dc.contributor.authorBaz, David Vicente
dc.contributor.authorCil, Timucin
dc.contributor.authorAdjei, Alex A.
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Myung-Ju
dc.contributor.authorBarlesi, Fabrice
dc.contributor.authorFelip, Enriqueta
dc.contributor.authorGaron, Edward B.
dc.contributor.authorAudhuy, Francois
dc.contributor.authorIto, Rena
dc.contributor.authorSato, Masashi
dc.contributor.authorEggleton, S. Peter
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Claudio Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorReck, Martin
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Clifford G
dc.contributor.authorPaz-Ares, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-09T11:08:46Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-06
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Preclinical evaluation of bintrafusp alfa (BA) combined with radiotherapy revealed greater antitumor effects than BA or radiotherapy alone. In a phase 1 study, BA exhibited encouraging clinical activity in patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who had received previous treatment. Methods: This multicenter, double-blind, controlled phase 2 study (NCT03840902) evaluated the safety and efficacy of BA with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by BA (BA group) versus placebo with cCRT followed by durvalumab (durvalumab group) in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. The primary end point was progression -free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as assessed by the investigator. On the basis of the recommendation of an independent data monitoring committee, the study was discontinued before the maturity of overall survival data (secondary end point). Results: A total of 153 patients were randomized to either BA (n = 75) or durvalumab groups (n = 78). The median progression -free survival was 12.8 months versus 14.6 months (stratified hazard ratio = 1.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.69-3.17]), in the BA and durvalumab groups, respectively. Trends for overall response rate (29.3% versus 32.1%) and disease control rate (66.7% versus 70.5%) were similar between the two groups. Any -grade treatment -emergent adverse events occurred in 94.6% versus 96.1% of patients in the BA versus durvalumab groups, respectively. Bleeding events in the BA group were mostly grade 1 (21.6%) or 2 (9.5%). Conclusions: BA with cCRT followed by BA exhibited no efficacy benefit over placebo with cCRT followed by durvalumab in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC. (c) 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, cilt 19, sayı 2, 2024, ss. 285-296en
dc.identifier.issn1556-0864
dc.identifier.issue2en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/14093
dc.identifier.volume19en
dc.identifier.wos001171035700001en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBaşkent Üniversitesi
dc.sourceJOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGYen
dc.subjectBintrafusp alfa
dc.subjectTGF-b
dc.subjectConcurrent chemo radiotherapy
dc.subjectBifunctional
dc.subjectNon-small cell lung cancer
dc.titleBintrafusp Alfa With CCRT Followed by Bintrafusp Alfa Versus Placebo With CCRT Followed by Durvalumab in Patients With Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: A Phase 2 Randomized Study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1-s2.0-S15560864230226.pdf
Size:
537.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: