Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire

dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Gurkan
dc.contributor.authorKanik, Zeynep Hazar
dc.contributor.authorKarabicak, Gul Oznur
dc.contributor.authorSozlu, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorPala, Omer Osman
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, Zeynep Beyza
dc.contributor.authorBasar, Selda
dc.contributor.authorCitaker, Seyit
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3248-0638en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID26898339en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDE-3771-2014en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-14T08:37:41Z
dc.date.available2023-07-14T08:37:41Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBackground: Low back pain is among the most common musculoskeletal system disorders. Outcome measures are needed for the measurement of function, to establish a treatment program, and for monitoring the improvement in low back pain. There exist several questionnaires enquiring about function in low back pain. One of these is Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, whose reliability and validity were previously established. Other than the original version of the questionnaire, only its Persian version exists. The present study aims to investigate the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Methods: The study included 103 patients with low back pain. For reliability assessment of the questionnaire, test retest and internal consistency analyses were performed. The results of test retest analysis were assessed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient method. For internal consistency, Cronbach Alpha value was used. Validity analyses of the questionnaire were performed by construct validity. For construct validity, convergent validity was tested. Convergent validity of the questionnaire was calculated via its correlation with suitable subscales of the Short Form-36 and the total score of the Oswestry Disability Index by using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient values for test retest reliability were found to be in the range of 0.765-0.924, which indicate a sufficient level of test retest reliability. Cronbach's Alpha value was found to be 0.804 indicating a high internal consistency. Pearson's correlation coefficient between Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Short Form-36 and Oswestry Disability Index values were ranged between 0.424 and 0.810, indicating a good correlation. Conclusions: Considering all these data, it was concluded that the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire is valid and reliable. (C) 2016 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage298en_US
dc.identifier.issn0949-2658en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84989926971en_US
dc.identifier.startpage295en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/9918
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wos000377727200008en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPHYSICAL-THERAPYen_US
dc.subjectDISABILITYen_US
dc.subjectHEALTHen_US
dc.subjectCAREen_US
dc.titleCross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaireen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: