Correlation Between Cephalometric Nasal Changes and Patients' Perception After Orthognathic Surgery

dc.contributor.authorAtakan, Azize
dc.contributor.authorOzcirpici, Ayca Arman
dc.contributor.pubmedID33741253en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-07T11:38:06Z
dc.date.available2022-09-07T11:38:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between cephalometric measurements and patients' perception of nasal changes in those with Class III malocclusion who had undergone orthognathic surgery. Methods: Eighty-five patients (36 men and 49 women) who received maxillary advancement with (group 1) or without (group 2) maxillary impaction were included in this study. Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken before and at the end of the treatment were analyzed. The patients were given an esthetic evaluation form and asked to evaluate their own noses on the Likert scale (subjective perception), while at the same time, they were asked to evaluate profile silhouettes without knowing that it was their own profile (objective perception). The changes and correlations between the cephalometric measurements and the scores obtained from the esthetic perception questionnaire were evaluated statistically. Results: Postoperative nasal tip inclination and rotation, nasofacial angle, and sagittal position of pronasale had increased significantly (P <0.05), whereas nasal tip protrusion, nasofrontal angle, and vertical position of pronasale had decreased (P <0.05). The change in the nasolabial angle and vertical position of pronasale was statistically different between the 2 surgical groups (P <0.05). In the end, a significant increase was observed in the patients' objective nasal esthetic scores (P <0.05). Conclusions: Soft tissues are affected by the vertical and sagittal surgical movements of the maxilla. There was a moderate correlation between patients' perception of nasal changes and cephalometric measurements. The subjective evaluation of the nose was similar among patients after surgery, but in the objective assessment, patients found their noses more esthetic.en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE460en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102655829en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE449en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/7566
dc.identifier.volume159en_US
dc.identifier.wos000656753500002en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.11.034en_US
dc.relation.journalAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSOFT-TISSUE CHANGESen_US
dc.subjectBIMAXILLARY SURGERYen_US
dc.subjectPROFILEBIASen_US
dc.titleCorrelation Between Cephalometric Nasal Changes and Patients' Perception After Orthognathic Surgeryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: