Fakülteler / Faculties
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1395
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Prognostic factors of endometrial cancer in elderly patient group and their effects on survival(2021) Alemdaroglu, Songul; Durdag, Gulsen Dogan; Baran, Safak Yilmaz; Simsek, Seda Yuksel; Yetkinel, Selcuk; Yaginc, Didem Alkas; Guler, Ozan Cem; Celik, Husnu; 0000-0003-4335-6659; 34585068; AAI-8400-2021OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the prognostic factors of the elderly group and their effects on survival by examining the histopathological features, surgical treatment protocols, and treatment modalities of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: The records of 397 EC patients who completed their treatment and follow-up at a single center between 2012 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were evaluated in two groups as <70 years old (n: 301; 75.8%) and >70 years old (n: 96; 24.2%). Following the evaluation of histopathological features and treatment protocols, independent risk factors influencing survival were investigated with the Cox regression model. RESULTS: The incidence of non-endometrioid histology (16.3% vs. 32.3%, p: 0.001), high-grade tumors (50.5% vs. 69.8%; p: 0.001), and >50 myometrial invasion (19.6% vs. 36.5%, p: 0.003) in the >70 age group was more frequent than that in the <70 age group. The independent risk factors on overall survival in the >70 age group were determined as non-endometrioid histology (HR: 5.9; 95% CI: 1.4- 24.7) and lymph node metastasis (HR: 6.4; 95% CI: 1.6-25.0). In the <70 age group, non-endometrioid histology (HR: 11.3; 95% CI: 4.0-32.0) was identified as the only independent risk factor affecting 5-year survival. CONCLUSION: EC, with non-endometrioid histology, which is observed at a higher rate in elderly patients despite equal surgery and adjuvant therapy, is the primary factor that affects survival.Item Definitive Brachytherapy in Inoperable Endometrial Cancer(2019) Onal, CemIn elderly patients with medical comorbidities that increase perioperative risks, surgery cannot be performed, and definitive radiotherapy (RT) is a therapeutic option. Although staging for endometrial cancer is based on surgical findings, clinical and radiological imaging has not been standardized yet. For a radiological evaluation of inoperable endometrial cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred for local tumor infiltration, and positron emission tomography is accepted as the most accurate modality for assessing lymph node and distant metastases. External RT alone is inadequate, and intracavitary brachytherapy with or without external RT is recommended depending on the disease stage in patients with inoperable endometrial cancer. However, there is currently no standard treatment approach for patients with inoperable endometrial cancer. For patients with inoperable endometrial cancer treated with definitive RT, there are some problems including the RT technique, treatment volumes, and systemic treatment. Based on clinical practice, image-based brachytherapy using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is highly recommended.Item Effects of bladder distension on dose distribution of vaginal vault brachytherapy in patients with endometrial cancer(2014) Guler, Ozan C.; Onal, Cem; Acibuci, Ibrahim; 25834581Purpose: To investigate dosimetric effects of bladder distention on organs at risk (OARs) during treatment of endometrial cancer using 3D image-based planning of postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy (BRT). Material and methods: Fifteen patients with early-stage endometrial cancer were studied, each undergoing adjuvant BRT of vaginal vault via 3.5 cm diameter cylinder. As treatment, 25 Gy in 5 fractions were delivered to 5 mm depth of the vaginal mucosa. Dose-volume histograms of OARs were generated individually with bladder empty and with bladder inflated by sterile saline (180 ml), to compare doses received. Results: Bladder distention appreciably impacted dosimetry of bladder, sigmoid colon, and small bowel, but dosimetry of rectum was unaffected. With bladder inflated, mean cylinder-to-bowel distance increased significantly (1.69 cm vs. 1.20 cm; p = 0.006). Mean minimum dose to most exposed 2 cc (D-2cc) volume also rose significantly at bladder (5.40 Gy vs. 4.55 Gy [18.7%]; p < 0.001), as opposed to near-significant reductions in D-2cc at sigmoid colon (15.1%; p = 0.11) and at small bowel (10.5%; p = 0.14). A full bladder had no effect on dose to 50% volume (D-50%) of bladder or rectum, and declines seen in mean D-50% values of sigmoid colon (22.7%; p = 0.12) and small bowel (19.0%; p = 0.13) again fell short of statistical significance. Conclusions: The combination of a full bladder and an empty rectum may cause significant unwanted increases in BRT dosing of bladder, without significantly impacting sigmoid colon and small bowel exposures. These findings should be validated through further clinical studies.