Fakülteler / Faculties

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1395

Browse

Filters

2014 - 20163

Settings

search.filters.applied.f.rights: search.filters.rights.info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessSubject: search.filters.subject.kidney

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Effect of Acrylamide Treatment on Arginase Activities and Nitric Oxide Levels in Rat Liver and Kidney
    (2014) Ozturan-Ozer, Eda; Ucar, Gulberk; Helvacioglu, Fatma; Akaydin-Aldemir, Derya; Turkoglu, Suna; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-4043; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6026-0045; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-1918; AAK-3000-2021; AAH-8887-2021; AAJ-2243-2021
    Aim: To evaluate the effects of acrylamide treatment on the activities of rat liver, kidney arginase activities and nitric oxide levels considering the possible induction of oxidative stress. Materials and methods: Serum aminotransferase activities, blood-urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine concentrations and tissue malondialdehyde (MDA), reduced glutathione (GSH), total nitrite concentrations and arginase activities were evaluated in groups. Histopathological analysis was performed. Results: Acrylamide treatment did not modulate liver and kidney serum markers. Hepatic MDA, GSH concentrations did not change whereas they were elevated in kidney tissues of high dose treated group (p<0.05). Arginase activity in grain liver tissue decreased (p<0.0001), but specific activity did not alter. Total nitrite concentrations increased in high dose treated group (p<0.05). In kidney, high dose of acrylamide treatment elevated activity and specific activity of arginase (p<0.05). No alteration was detected in total nitrite levels. Ultrastructural alterations were detected in epithelial cells of proximal tubules in kidney sections of the rats treated with high dose of aculamide. Conclusion: Liver seems to protect itself against acrylamide toxicity whereas, kidney can be considered as a probable target tissue for acrylamide-induced oxidative stress.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Optimal b Value in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiation of Abdominal Lesions
    (2014) Koc, Zafer; Erbay, Gurcan; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0987-1980; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-8680; 24115207; S-8384-2016; AAK-5370-2021
    Purpose: To explore the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiation of benign and malignant abdominal lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 108 consecutive patients (age 60 +/- 12.5 years) with 127 pathologically confirmed diagnoses of abdominal lesions were included. Single-shot echoplanar imaging (SH-EPI) DWI (1.5T) with seven b values and eight apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were obtained. The lesions were analyzed visually on DWI and ADC maps for benignity/malignity using a 5-point scale and by measuring the ADC values and ADC lesion/normal parenchyma ADC ratio. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ADC for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Pathology results were the reference standard. Results: Differentiation between malignant and benign lesions using visual scoring was successful at b values of 600 or higher (sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were 100/93.8/92.5, 84.7/82.6/80.4, and 94.4/89.7/88.1, respectively, for b600, 800, and 1000). The mean ADC values of malignant lesions were significantly lower than those of benign lesions for all b-value combinations except b0 and 50 s/mm(2) (P = 0.032 for b0 and 50 s/mm(2), P = 0.000 for other b values). The best b-value combination was 0 and 600 s/mm(2) and multiple b2. The lesion/normal parenchymal ADC ratio for b600, b1000, and multiple b2 better distinguished between benign and malignant lesions. Conclusion: In DWI, the optimal b value is 600 s/mm(2); multiple b values of 600 s/mm(2) and higher are recommended to differentiate between benign and malignant abdominal lesions. The lesion ADC/normal parenchyma ADC ratio is more accurate than using lesion ADC only.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Prophylactic Ozone Administration Reduces Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in The Rat
    (2016) Kal, Oznur; Akillioglu, Ishak; Kal, Ali; Celik, Esin; Yilmaz, Mustafa; Onal, Merih; Onal, Ozkan; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7751-4961; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7544-5790; AAJ-7586-2021; AAJ-4936-2021
    Background: The objective of this study was to examine the role of ozone oxidative preconditioning after renal IR (ischemia reperfusion) injury. Methods: Twenty-eight Wistar rats were randomized into four groups: sham operated (S), IR, ozone (O), and O+IR. The S group was administered physiological saline (PS) intraperitoneally (i.p.) for seven days. The IR group was subjected to renal ischemia for 1 h by occlusion of the left renal artery and vein, followed by reperfusion for 2 h. The O group was administered ozone i.p. for seven days. In the O+IR group, ozone was administered i.p. for seven days before the IR procedure. IR injury (as in the IR group) was induced on the eight day. Laboratory analyses of renal tissue samples for superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were performed. Results: The total oxidant score (TOS) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of the blood samples were also analyzed. The degree of renal injury was highest in the IR group. In the O+IR group, renal injury was decreased. The antioxidant parameters were increased in the O group. The oxidant parameters were highest in the IR group. Conclusion: Ozone preconditioning ameliorated renal IR injury, with a significant decrease observed in the renal IR injury score.