Fakülteler / Faculties
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1395
Browse
10 results
Search Results
Item Prevention of Radiation-Induced Retinopathy with Amifostine in Wistar Albino Rats(2015) Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Cetin, Eren; Topkan, Erkan; Ozyigit, Gokhan; Cengiz, Mustafa; Surucu, Selcuk; Usubutun, Alp; Akyol, Fadil; 0000-0001-6661-4185; 25768249; V-5717-2017Item Restaging of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant Radiotherapy According to FIGO 2018 and Suggestions for the Next Staging: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Gynecologic Group Study (TROD 04-004)(2022) Alanyali, Senem; Balci, Beril; Esen, Caglayan Selenge Beduk; Gultekin, Melis; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Ozkurt, Selnur; Ergen, Sefika Arzu; Gursel, Sukriye Bilge; Cetin, Ilknur Alsan; Sert, Fatma; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Ibis, Kamuran; Onal, Cem; Sahinler, Ismet; Yildiz, Ferah; Ozsaran, ZeynepOBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 and 2018 staging systems in patients with uterine cervical cancer. METHODS Medical records of 571 patients who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy between 2001 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates according to FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2018 staging systems were compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression model was used to identify independent prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS The median follow-up was 59 months. Five-year OS and PFS rates were 81.1% and 77.7%, respectively. Stage migration was recorded in 401 patients (70.2%) and the most remarkable stage migration was detected in stage I patients (60%). A total of 157 (27.5%) patients upstaged to stage IIIC disease. According to FIGO 2009, 5-year OS rates were 87.3%, 80.5% (p=0.076), and PFS rates were 82.8%, 77.5% (p=0.036) for stage IB1 and IB2, respectively. According to FIGO 2018, the 5-year OS rates for stage IB1, IB2, and IB3 were 89.8%, 87.1%, and 81.4% (p=0.310), and PFS rates were 90.2%, 80.5%, and 80.1% (p=0.189), respectively. Patients with >= 2 pelvic lymph node (LN) metastases had worse 5-year OS and PFS rates than patients with one metastasis (p=0.015 and p=0.006). Number of para-aortic LN metastasis and metastatic LN ratio (MLNR) were also correlated with 5-year OS and PFS. CONCLUSION Current FIGO staging system better discriminates patients with cervical cancer. However, integration of metastatic LN number and/or MLNR to the upcoming FIGO staging system may improve the prognostic value of the staging.Item Retrospective Comparison of Standard and Escalated Doses of Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide(2019) Guler, Ozan Cem; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Onal, Cem; Topkan, Erkan; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-3412; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6661-4185; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-9021; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-7123; 30950447; AAC-5654-2020; V-5717-2017; HOC-5611-2023; AAG-2213-2021BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacies of standard dose-(SDRT) and escalated dose radiotherapy (EDRT) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outcomes of 126 newly diagnosed GBM patients who received SDRT (60 Gy, 30 fractions) or EDRT (70 Gy, 30 fractions) with concurrent plus adjuvant TMZ were retrospectively analyzed. Both groups received concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m(2)) during the course of RT and at least one course of adjuvant TMZ (150-200 mg/m(2)), thereafter. Overall survival (OS) and local progression free survival (LPFS) constituted the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. RESULTS: At median 14.2 months follow-up, 26 (20.6%) patients were alive. Median LPFS and OS were 9.2 [95% confidence interval (CI); 8.4-10.0] and 15.4 months (95% CI; 12.1-18.8), respectively, for the entire cohort. Although the median OS was numerically superior in the EDRT this difference could not reach statistical significance (22.0 vs. 14.9 months; P = 0.45), Likewise, LPFS was also (9.9 vs. 8.9 months; P = 0.89) not different between the two treatment groups. In multivariate analysis, better recursive partitioning analysis class (3-4 vs. 5; P = 0.044) and extensive surgery (gross total resection vs. subtotal resection/biopsy only; P = 0.021) were identified to associate significantly with superior OS times, irrespective of the RT protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Although the current median OS of 22 months of the EDRT group is promising, no statistically significant survival advantage for EDRT was observed even in the presence of TMZ. Randomized studies with larger population sizes and available genetic markers are warranted to conclude more reliably on the fate of EDRT plus TMZ.Item Effect of Adjuvant Extended Temozolamide Treatment in Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme(2018) Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Sumbul, Ahmet Taner; Topkan, Erkan; Ozdemir, Yurday; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Guler, Ozan Cem; Sedef, Ali Murat; Onal, Cem; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6661-4185; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5573-906X; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-7123; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-2074; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7862-0192; V-5717-2017; D-4793-2014; AAG-2213-2021; AAG-5629-2021; AAD-6910-2021; HOC-5611-2023Purpose: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the prognostic effect extended temozolamide on survival outcomes of glioblastoma multiforme patients who were underwent surgery/biopsy followed treated with definitive chemo-radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the datas of 225 patients with gliablastoma multiforme whom admitted to our clinic All patients were completed concomitant chemoradiotherapy with temozolamide and adjuvant temozolamide therapy at least for six months or more. Patients were divided into two groups as standart and extended temozolamid therapy group as using temozolamide therapy for at least 6 months or more. Results: The median follow-up of the whole patients18 (range 2-125) months, 65 patients (56%) were alive. Extended temozolamide (>6) was associated with longer survival, but was not significantly with survival outcomes in the univariate analysis (49.0 vs 68.33 months; p=0.082). However, progression free survival analysis demonstrated that the patient in extended temozolamide group had paramount extended progression free survival (14 vs 9 months) than other group in standart cycle temozolamide. Conclusion: Our study show that extended temozolamide is good tolerated and leads to a significantly increase in progression free survival and overall survival in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma multiforme.Item Oncological Outcomes For Encapsulated Papillary Carcinoma Of The Breast: Multicentric Study Of Turkish Society For Radiation Oncology Breast Cancer Study Group (TROD 06-014 Study)(2023) Gurdal, Necla; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Gursel, Ozge Kandemir; Ozkurt, Selnur; Ibis, Kamuran; Gultekin, Melis; Tepetam, Huseyin; Gul, Sule Karabulut; Guzeloz, Zeliha; Oksuz, Didem Colpan; Cetin, Ilknur Alsan; Yalcin, Berrin; Duzova, Mursel; Kanyilmaz, Gul; Yavas, Guler; Ozsaran, Zeynep; 36464924BackgroundEncapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) is a rare malignant papillary breast cancer accounting for approximately .5%-2% of all breast tumors. The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate clinicopathologic features of EPC in addition to oncological outcomes and radiotherapy (RT) details. MethodsFrom 10 different academic hospitals in Turkey, we obtained pathology reports of 80 patients with histologically confirmed EPC between 2005 and 2022. Demographic, diagnostic, and treatment data were collected from medical records, retrospectively. Local failure, distant progression, toxicity-adverse effects, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival were evaluated, and survival analyzes were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsEighty patients with the diagnosis of misspelled sorry (ECP) were retrospectively evaluated. The median age of the patients was 63 (range, 35-85). After a median follow-up of 48 (range; 6-206) months, local recurrence was observed in three patients (4%). Local recurrence was less common in the patients who received whole breast RT with a tumour bed boost (p = .025). There were not any distant metastasis or disease-related death. RT was applied to 61% of the cases, and no treatment-related grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported in any of the patients. Five year OS, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and were observed as 85%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. ConclusionsECP is a rare, slow-progressing breast carcinoma associated with good prognosis, it is a disease of elderly patient, and usually occurs in postmenopausal women. It responds extremely well to optimal local treatments and appropriate adjuvant treatments on a patient basis, and has excellent OS and CSS ratios.Item Role of vaginal brachytherapy boost following adjuvant external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Gynecologic Group Study (TROD 04-002)(2021) Gultekin, Melis; Esen, Caglayan Selenge Beduk; Balci, Beril; Alanyali, Senem; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Guler, Ozan Cem; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Ergen, Sefika Arzu; Sahinler, Ismet; Cetin, Ilknur Alsan; Onal, Cem; Yildiz, Ferah; Ozsaran, Zeynep; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 0000-0001-6661-4185; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 32998860; D-5195-2014; V-5717-2017; AAC-5654-2020Objective There are a limited number of studies supporting vaginal brachytherapy boost to external beam radiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the addition of vaginal brachytherapy boost to adjuvant external beam radiotherapy on oncological outcomes and toxicity in patients with cervical cancer. Methods Patients treated with post-operative external beam radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy +/- vaginal brachytherapy between January 2001 and January 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The treatment outcomes and prognostic factors were analyzed in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy. Results A total of 480 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 51 years (range 42-60). At least two intermediate risk factors were observed in 51% of patients, while 49% had at least one high-risk factor. The patients in the external beam radiotherapy + vaginal brachytherapy group had worse prognostic factors than the external beam radiotherapy alone group. With a median follow-up time of 56 months (range 33-90), the 5-year overall survival rate was 82%. There was no difference in 5-year overall survival (87% vs 79%, p=0.11), recurrence-free survival (74% vs 71%, p=0.49), local recurrence-free survival (78% vs 76%, p=0.16), and distant metastasis-free survival (85% vs 76%, p=0.09) rates between treatment groups. There was no benefit of addition of vaginal brachytherapy to external beam radiotherapy in patients with positive surgical margins. In multivariate analysis, stage (overall survival and local recurrence-free survival), tumor histology (recurrence-free survival, local recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival), parametrial invasion (recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival), lymphovascular space invasion (recurrence-free survival), and lymph node metastasis (distant metastasis-free survival) were found as negative prognostic factors. Conclusion Adding vaginal brachytherapy boost to external beam radiotherapy did not provide any benefit in local control or survival in patients with cervical cancer.Item Multi-institutional validation of the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference risk grouping in Turkish endometrial cancer patients treated with comprehensive surgical staging(2020) Gultekin, Melis; Guler, Ozan Cem; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Onal, Cem; Celik, Husnu; Yuce, Kunter; Ayhan, Ali; Arik, Zafer; Kose, Fatih; Altundag, Ozden; Mustafayev, Teuta Zoto; Atalar, Banu; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Yildiz, Ferah; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 0000-0002-0156-5973; 0000-0003-0197-6622; 0000-0001-6661-4185; 32347768; AAC-5654-2020; D-5195-2014; G-4827-2016; W-9219-2019; AAJ-5802-2021In this study, 683 patients with endometrial cancer (EC) after comprehensive surgical staging were classified into four risk groups as low (LR), intermediate (IR), high-intermediate (HIR) and high-risk (HR), according to the recent consensus risk grouping. Patients with disease confined to the uterus, >= 50% myometrial invasion (MI) and/or grade 3 histology were treated with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). Patients with stage II disease, positive/close surgical margins or extra-uterine extension were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)+/- VBT. The median follow-up was 56 months. The overall survival (OS) was significantly different between LR and HR groups, and there was a trend between LR and HIR groups. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly different between LR and HIR, LR and HR and IR and HR groups. There was no significant difference in OS and RFS rates between the HIR and HR groups. In HR patients, the OS and RFS rates were significantly higher in stage IB - grade 3 and stage II compared to stage III and non-endometrioid histology without any difference between the two uterine-confined stages and between stage III and non-endometrioid histology. The current risk grouping does not clearly discriminate the HIR and IR groups. In patients with comprehensive surgical staging, a further risk grouping is needed to distinguish the real HR group.Impact statement What is already known on this subject? The standard treatment for endometrial cancer (EC) is surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy is recommended according to risk factors. The recent European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) guideline have introduced a new risk group. However, the risk grouping is still quite heterogeneous. What do the results of this study add? This study demonstrated that the current risk grouping recommended by ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO does not clearly discriminate the intermediate risk (IR) and high-intermediate risk (HIR) groups. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Based on the results of this study, a new risk grouping can be made to discriminate HIR and IR groups clearly in patients with comprehensive surgical staging.Item Stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive gynecological malignancies: a multi-institutional analysis(2020) Onal, Cem; Gultekin, Melis; Oymak, Ezgi; Guler, Ozan Cem; Yilmaz, Melek Tugce; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Yildiz, Ferah; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 32273293; D-5195-2014; AAC-5654-2020Introduction Data supporting stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients are increasing; however, the outcomes for gynecological cancer patients have yet to be fully explored. Our aim is to analyze the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent or oligometastatic ovarian cancer or cervical cancer. Methods The clinical data of 29 patients (35 lesions) with oligometastatic cervical cancer (21 patients, 72%) and ovarian carcinoma (8 patients, 28%) who were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sites were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had <5 metastases at diagnosis or during progression, and were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease. Patients with >= 5 metastases or with brain metastases and those who underwent re-irradiation for primary site were excluded. Age, progression time, mean biologically effective dose, and treatment response were compared for overall survival and progression-free survival. Results A total of 29 patients were included in the study. De novo oligometastatic disease was observed in 7 patients (24%), and 22 patients (76%) had oligoprogression. The median follow-up was 15.3 months (range 1.9-95.2). The 1 and 2 year overall survival rates were 85% and 62%, respectively, and the 1 and 2 year progression-free survival rates were 27% and 18%, respectively. The 1 and 2 year local control rates for all patients were 84% and 84%, respectively. All disease progressions were observed at a median time of 7.7 months (range 1.0-16.0) after the completion of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Patients with a complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis had a significantly higher 2 year overall survival and progression-free survival compared with their counterparts. In multivariate analysis, early progression (<= 12 months) and complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis were the significant prognostic factors for improved overall survival. However, no significant factor was found for progression-free survival in the multivariable analysis. No patients experienced grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities. Conclusions Patients with early detection of oligometastasis (<= 12 months) and with complete response observed at the stereotactic body radiotherapy site had a better survival compared with their counterparts. Stereotactic body radiotherapy at the oligometastatic site resulted in excellent local control rates with minimal toxicity, and can potentially contribute to long-term survival.Item Treatment outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis: a multi-institutional analysis(2019) Onal, Cem; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Yavas, Guler; Gultekin, Melis; Guler, Ozan Cem; Yildiz, Ferah; Akyurek, Serap; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 30640689; D-5195-2014; AAC-5654-2020Objective To analyze the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis. Methods Data from four centers were collected retrospectively for 92 patients with endometrial cancer treated with combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy alone postoperatively, delivered by either the sandwich or sequential method. Prognostic factors affecting overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed. Results The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 35 % and 33 %, respectively, after a median follow-up time of 33 months. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy postoperatively compared with patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy alone (P < 0.001and P < 0.001, respectively). In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with adjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy via the sandwich method compared with patients treated with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P = 0.02and P = 0.03, respectively). In the univariate analysis, in addition to treatment strategy, pathology, depth of myometrial invasion, and tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for both overall survival and progression-free survival. In the multivariate analysis, grade III disease, myometrial invasion greater than or equal to 50%, and adjuvant radiotherapy alone were negative predictors for both overall survival and progression-free survival. Conclusion We demonstrated that adjuvant combined treatment including radiotherapyand chemotherapy significantly increases overall survival and progression-free survival rates compared with postoperative pelvic and paraaortic radiotherapy.Item Integration of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in Radiotherapy Planning for Prostate Cancer Patients(2019) Onal, Cem; Torun, Nese; Akyol, Fadil; Guler, Ozan Cem; Hurmuz, Pervin; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Caglar, Meltem; Reyhan, Mehmet; Ozyigit, Gokhan; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 31283600Purpose To assess the role of (68)Gallium-labeled-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT (Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT) in risk group definition and radiotherapy planning in the initially planned definitive radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer patients. Methods The clinical data of 191 prostate cancer patients treated with definitive intensity-modulated RT were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were initially staged with thoracoabdominal CT and bone scintigraphy, and the second staging was performed using Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT. Both stages were evaluated for the decision making of RT and any change in RT target volumes. Results After staging with Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT, 26 patients (13.6%) had risk group changes, 16 patients (8.4%) had an increase in risk group, and 10 patients (5.2%) had a decrease in risk group. Down-staging occurred in 22 patients (11.5%), and upstaging was observed in 30 patients (15.7%). A total of 26 patients (13.6%) had nodal stage changes. After the Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT scans, the number of metastatic patient increased to 17 (8.9%), with 4 of them moving from oligo- to polymetastatic disease. An additional irradiation of pelvic lymphatics and metastatic site was performed in 13 patients (6.8%) and 6 patients (3.2%), respectively. The RT was aborted in 4 patients (2.1%) because of parenchymal or distant site metastasis observed in the Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT. Conclusions We found that Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT causes considerable migration in stage, risk group, and RT field arrangements, especially in high-risk patients regardless of the GS and baseline prostate-specific antigen values alone. Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT seems to have a great influence on RT decision making in prostate cancer patients.