Fakülteler / Faculties
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1395
Browse
11 results
Search Results
Item Assessment of the Direct Medical Costs of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications in Turkey(2014) Malhan, Simten; Oksuz, Ergun; Babineaux, Steven M.; Ertekin, Ali; Palmer, James P.; 0000-0002-5723-5965; K-8238-2012Purpose: To estimate the direct annual medical costs of Type 2 diabetes and its complications in diagnosed patients in Turkey. Material and Method: A cost-of-illness model was developed. The prevalence of Type 2 diabetes was derived from the Turkish Diabetes Epidemiology Study, estimated as 13.7% in adults, with one-third of patients previously undiagnosed. Complication costs were extracted from the records of 7095 patients at a Turkish tertiary care hospital in 2009. For each modelled complication, acute phase costs were applied to globally derived incidence rates, and one-year follow-up costs were applied to globally derived prevalence rates. Costs and frequencies of ongoing antihyperglycaemic treatment and disease management were derived from treatment guidelines and Turkish hospital records. Parameter variation was performed. Results: The cost of Type 2 diabetes in diagnosed patients was estimated at between 11.4 to 12.9 billion Turkish Lira, 1% of Gross Domestic Product. Cardiovascular complications comprised the largest share of total medical costs (between 24.3% and 32.6%), followed by renal complicationsrelated costs (between 25% and 28.3%) and concomitant cardiovascular and antihypertensive medication costs (between 14.2% and 16%). Antihyperglycaemic medications and screening costs comprised between 10.9% to 12.3% and between 4.4% to 5% of total costs, respectively. Discussion: Type 2 diabetes is a disease burden and economic burden in Turkey; the complications cost is higher than the cost of disease control. For preventing complications, any activities effect positively limited resources and also quality of life.Item Patient Characteristics And Management Practices In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Turkey: Reflections From An Expert Meeting(2022) Eskazan, Ahmet Emre; Ali, Ridvan; Alnigenis, Ebru; Ayyildiz, Orhan; Haznedaroglu, Ibrahim; Kirkizlar, Onur; Kurtoglu, Erdal; Malhan, Simten; Oksuz, Ergun; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5723-5965; 35184657; K-8238-2012Introduction The therapeutic landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has evolved significantly since the introduction of imatinib. The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations serve as a guide for diagnosis, treatment, and monitorization of CML, but availability and accessibility of diagnostic tools and medications affect their applicability. Areas covered This article provides an overview of the current clinical management of CML in Turkey with reference to the key outputs of the online expert meeting held in November 2020. The applicability of the ELN 2020 recommendations for treating CML in clinical practice was also discussed. Expert opinion Imatinib is the only reimbursed and the most preferred first-line treatment in CML restricting the upfront use of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), thereby limiting the applicability of treatment-free remission approach in Turkey. The ELN recommendations about using the EUTOS Long-Term Survival (ELTS) score for risk assessment and focusing on patient reported outcomes and quality of life can be enhanced with educational activities. The widespread availability of standardized technical infrastructure for diagnosing and monitoring CML will contribute to better disease management. Establishing a sustainable national database for CML is valuable for observing patient characteristics and disease outcomes as well as the impact of treatment patterns over time.Item Efficacy and Cost-Effectivity Analysis of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Unit in Infectious Disease Clinical Practices: Turkey Perspective(2021) Bastug, Aliye; Oksuz, Ergun; Kazancioglu, Sumeyye; Malhan, Simten; Ozbay, Bahadir Orkun; Bodur, Hurrem; 0000-0002-5723-5965; 33709495; K-8238-2012Background Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) has become a common treatment modality in developed countries. OPAT units are not widespread in Turkey, and their cost-effectivity analysis has not been studied, yet. Aims To analyze the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the OPAT unit, based on a 1000-bed teaching hospital. Methods The records of patients, who were treated between October 2013 and December 2017, in an OPAT unit of a tertiary hospital in Ankara, were obtained retrospectively. The cost that would arise if the patients were hospitalized for the same treatment period with the same diagnosis was calculated and compared with the actual treatment cost of the patients in the OPAT unit. Results A total of 594 patients who received antimicrobial treatment at the OPAT unit were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 55.39 +/- 16.37 years and 313 (52.7%) were males. Based on the end-of-treatment goals, 98.5% of the patients reached the treatment goal. An indirect cost analysis revealed that the OPAT unit was 487.625 94 TL/129.008 78 $ less costly than inpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment. In other words, OPAT cost was 75% of the equivalent inpatient costs. It was also determined that a total of 7078 bed days and 11.9 bed days per person were saved. Conclusions OPAT units should be expanded increasingly in Turkey. The evaluation together with the health care system conditions in Turkey revealed that the OPAT program is safe, effective, and cost-efficient.Item Economic Burden Of Lung Cancer In Turkey: A Cost Of Illness Study From Payer Perspective(2021) Cicin, Irfan; Oksuz, Ergun; Karadurmus, Nuri Nuri; Malhan, Simten; Gumus, Mahmut; Yilmaz, Ulku; Cansever, Levent; Cinarka, Halit; Cetinkaya, Erdogan; Kiyik, Murat; Ozet, Ahmet; 0000-0002-5723-5965; 34173876; K-8238-2012Background This study was designed to estimate economic burden of lung cancer in Turkey from payer perspective based on expert panel opinion on practice patterns in clinical practice. Methods In this cost of illness study, direct medical cost was calculated based on cost items related to outpatient visits, laboratory and radiological tests, hospitalizations/interventions, drug treatment, adverse events and metastasis. Indirect cost was calculated based on lost productivity due to early retirement, morbidity and premature death resulting from the illness, the value of lost productivity due to time spent by family caregivers and cost of formal caregivers. Results Cost analysis revealed the total per patient annual direct medical cost for small cell lung cancer to be euro8772), for non-small-cell lung cancer to be euro10,167. Total annual direct medical cost was euro497.9 million, total annual indirect medical cost was euro1.1 billion and total economic burden of lung cancer was euro1.6 billion. Hospitalization/interventions (41%) and indirect costs (68.6%) were the major cost drivers for total direct costs and the overall economic burden of lung cancer, respectively. Conclusions Our findings indicate per patient direct medical costs of small cell lung cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer to be substantial and comparable, indicating the substantial economic burden of lung cancer in terms of both direct and indirect costs. Our findings indicate that hospitalization/interventions cost item and indirect costs were the major cost drivers for total direct costs and the overall economic burden of lung cancer, respectively. Our findings emphasize the potential role of improved cancer prevention and early diagnosis strategies, by enabling cost savings related to drug treatment and metastasis management cost items, in sustainability of cancer treatments.Item Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Remdesivir Treatment in COVID-19 Patients Requiring Low-Flow Oxygen Therapy: Payer Perspective in Turkey(2021) Oksuz, Ergun; Malhan, Simten; Gonen, Mustafa Sait; Kutlubay, Zekayi; Keskindemirci, Yilmaz; Jarett, James; Sahin, Toros; Ozcagli, Gokcem; Bilgic, Ahmet; Bibilik, Merve Ozlem; Tabak, Ozlem; 0000-0002-5723-5965; 34379304; K-8238-2012Introduction This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir compared to other existing therapies (SoC) in Turkey to treat COVID-19 patients hospitalized with < 94% saturation and low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) requirement. Methods We compared remdesivir as the treatment for COVID-19 with the treatments in the Turkish treatment guidelines. Analyses were performed using data from 78 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with SpO(2) < 94% who received LFOT in a tertiary healthcare facility. COVID-19 episode costs were calculated for 78 patients considering the cost of modeled remdesivir treatment in the same group from the payer's perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was calculated for remdesivir versus the SoC for the population identified. For Turkey, a reimbursement threshold value between USD 8599 (1 x per capita gross domestic product-GDP) and USD 25.797 (3 x GDP) per QALY was used. Results In the remdesivir arm, the length of hospital stay (LOS) was 3 days shorter than the SOC. The low ventilator requirement in the remdesivir arm was one factor that decreased the QALY disutility value. In patients who were transferred to intensive care unit (ICU) from the ward, the mean LOS was 17.3 days (SD 13.6), and the mean cost of stay was USD 155.3/day (SD 168.0), while in patients who were admitted to ICU at baseline, the mean LOS was 13.1 days (SD 13.7), and the mean cost of stay was USD 207.9/day (SD 133.6). The mean cost of episode per patient was USD 3461.1 (SD 2259.8) in the remdesivir arm and USD 3538.9 (SD 3296.0) in the SOC arm. Incremental QALYs were estimated at 0.174. Remdesivir treatment was determined to be cost saving vs. SoC. Conclusions Remdesivir, which results in shorter LOS and lower rates of intubation requirements in ICU patients than existing therapies, is associated with higher QALYs and lower costs, dominating SoC in patients with SpO(2) < 94% who require oxygen support.Item Cost of hemophilia A in Turkey: an economic disease burden analysis(2021) Malhan, Simten; Oksuz, Ergun; Antmen, Bulent; Ar, Muhlis Cem; Balkan, Can; Kavakli, Kaan; 0000-0002-5723-5965; 34355649; K-8238-2012Objective: Hemophilia A is the second most common bleeding disorder causing patients to have lifelong follow-up and treatment. Despite being a rare disease, hemophilia A has a high economic burden on individuals and the public. The purpose of this study was to estimate the total disease cost of hemophilia A in Turkey. Materials and Methods: Data used in this analysis were collected through literature review, including studies conducted in Turkey in December 2018. A disease burden analysis was performed by modeling hemophilia A-related costs among patients, their relatives, and the social security system. Two expert panels were held to evaluate real-world data sources and to provide further information. All direct medical and non-medical costs were calculated annually from the Social Security Institution of the Republic of Turkey perspective, while indirect costs were estimated from the patient and community perspective. Results: For the calendar year of 2018, the number of hemophilia A patients in Turkey were estimated to be 5,055, with an average weight of 64.7 kg. The average annual direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs of hemophilia A were calculated as euro93,268 ($109,286; (sic)502,717), euro2,533 ($2,968; (sic)13,655), and euro7,957 ($9,323; (sic)42,888) per patient, respectively, with a total annual cost of euro103,759 ($121,578; (sic)559,259). For the management of patients with inhibitors (4.9%), the average annual total cost was calculated to be euro325,439 ($381,330; (sic)1,754,117) per patient. The total annual disease burden of hemophilia A in 2018 was estimated to be about euro524 million ($614 million; (sic)2.82 billion), which corresponded to 1.6% of the total health expenditure in Turkey. Conclusion: The most important reason hemophilia A has a significant economic burden in Turkey is that replacement therapy is expensive. The major cost contributor was identified as factor replacement therapy. With inhibitor development, the average annual cost increased more than 3-fold.Item COVID-19 healthcare cost and length of hospital stay in Turkey: retrospective analysis from the first peak of the pandemic(2021) Oksuz, Ergun; Malhan, Simten; Gonen, Mustafa Sait; Kutlubay, Zekayi; Keskindemirci, Yilmaz; Tabak, Fehmi; 0000-0002-5723-5965; 34623528; K-8238-2012Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, health care systems are under extreme pressure. This study analyzed health care resource use (HCRU) and costs in patients admitted to the hospital for COVID-19 and aimed to estimate the one-year direct medical cost of the disease in Turkey. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between March and July 2020 in a tertiary hospital (n = 1056) in Istanbul. Patient demographics, clinical and treatment characteristics at admission, comorbidities, disease severity, and costs from a payer perspective were evaluated using the microcosting method. The results include LOS, hospital costs, and univariate and generalized linear models to investigate influencing factors. The data were extrapolated to provide a country-level estimate. Results The mean length of stay was 9.1 days (SD 6.9). The mean length of stay was 8.0 days (4.7) for patients hospitalized in wards versus 14.8 days (SD 12.0) for patients hospitalized in the ICU. In univariate analysis, several factors, including O-2 therapy (+ 3.7 days), high CRP > 41.8 mg/L (+ 3.8 days), and elevated ferritin (+ 3.5), were found to be associated with a longer LOS (p < 0.05). The direct annual medical cost of COVID-19 was estimated at PPP$ 2.1 billion. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a direct medical burden that corresponds to 2.0% of the government health expenditures and 0.8 per thousand of Turkey's gross domestic product (GDP). Conclusions Estimating the impact of this pandemic in terms of HCRU and costs to the health care system can help design strategies to manage the pandemic.Item Five-Year Trends in Direct Costs of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Turkey: COPDTURKEY-3(2021) Ozdemir, Tarkan; Kilic, Hatice; Demirci, Nilgun Yilmaz; Ozdilekcan, Cigdem; Bektemur, Guven; Turkkani, Mustafa Hamidullah; Malhan, Simten; Hasanoglu, H. Canan; Koc, Orhan; Ozturk, Can; 35110213OBJECTIVE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The aim of this study was to reveal the trend in direct costs related to COPD between 2012 and 2016, and to evaluate hospital costs in 2016, together with their subcomponents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based descriptive study was conducted using administrative healthcare data in Turkey. The total direct cost of COPD diagnosis-treatment for each year from 2012 to 2016, was calculated. The distribution of the hospital's COPD-related costs for the year 2016 was also examined, together with morbidity data. RESULTS: The direct costs of the patients who were admitted to step 1, step 2, and step 3 health care centers between 2012 and 2016 increased by 41% [895 041 403TL ($496 930 501) in 2012 to 1 263 288 269TL ($417 834 197) in 2016]; the increase was 60% and 24%, for inpatient and outpatient groups respectively. In the year 2016, the direct total cost was 1003TL ($332) per patient. In 2016, mean specialist consultations per patient with mean cost per specialist consultation, and mean emergency visits per patient with mean cost per emergency visit, were 1.7, 42 TL ($14), and 0.4, 71TL ($23) respectively. For the inpatient group, the mean number of hospitalizations per patient, mean number of hospitalization days, and the mean cost per hospitalization were 0.4, 6.5, and 1926T1 ($637), respectively. CONCLUSION: When the readmissions of patients with COPD were evaluated together with the costs, and compared with the statistics from other countries, it was found that the costs per patient were lower in Turkey. However, the reasons for the significant rise in inpatient costs compared to outpatient costs should be investigated. Further investigations are required regarding pulmonary rehabilitation, home health care services, preventive measures for infections, management of comorbidities, and treatment optimization, which may reduce hospitalizations.Item Economic Burden of Pediatric Asthma in Turkey: A Cost of Illness Study from Payer Perspective(2020) Sekerel, Bulent Enis; Turktas, Haluk; Bavbek, Sevim; Oksuz, Ergun; Malhan, Simten; 0000-0002-5723-5965; 32687785; K-8238-2012OBJECTIVES: To estimate economic burden of pediatric asthma in Turkey from payer perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cost of illness study was based on identification of per patient annual direct medical costs for the management of pediatric asthma in Turkey from payer perspective. Average per patient direct medical cost was calculated based on cost items related to outpatient visits, laboratory and radiological tests, hospitalizations and interventions, drug treatment and equipment, and co-morbidities/complications. RESULTS: Based on total annual per patient costs calculated for outpatient admission ($113.14), laboratory-radiological tests ($35.94), hospitalizations ($725.92), drug treatment/equipment ($212.90) and co-morbidities/complications ($144.62) cost items, total per patient annual direct medical cost related to management of pediatric asthma was calculated to be $1,232.53 from payer perspective. Hospitalizations and interventions (58.9%) was the main cost driver. Direct cost for managing controlled and uncontrolled pediatric asthma were calculated to be $530.17 [key cost driver: drugs/equipment (40.0%)] and $1,023.16 [key cost driver: hospitalization/interventions (59.0%)], respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that managing patients with pediatric asthma pose a considerable burden to health economics in Turkey, with hospitalizations identified as the main cost driver and two-fold cost increment in case of uncontrolled disease.Item The impact of addressing modifiable risk factors to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in Turkey(2019) Balbay, Yucel; Gagnon-Arpin, Isabelle; Malhan, Simten; Oksuz, Mehmet Ergun; Sutherland, Greg; Dobrescu, Alexandru; Villa, Guillermo; Ertugul, Gulnihal; Habib, Modhar; 0000-0002-5723-5965; 31483303; K-8238-2012Objective: Our study aimed to estimate the impact of addressing modifiable risk factors on the future burden of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in the general population and in two high-risk populations (heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and secondary prevention) for Turkey. Methods: One model investigated the impact of reaching the World Health Organization (WHO) voluntary targets for tobacco use, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, obesity and physical inactivity in the general population. Another model estimated the impact of reducing LDL-cholesterol in two high-risk populations through increased access to effective treatment. Inputs for the models include disease and risk factor prevalence rates, a population forecast, baseline CVD event rates, and treatment effectiveness, primarily derived from the published literature. Direct costs to the public health care system and indirect costs from lost production are included, although the cost of programs and pharmacological interventions to reduce risk factors were not considered. Results: The value of reaching WHO risk factor reduction targets is estimated at US$9.3 billion over the next 20 years, while the value of reducing LDL-cholesterol is estimated at up to US$8.1 billion for high-risk secondary prevention patients and US$691 million for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients. Conclusion: Efforts to achieve WHO risk factor targets and further lower LDL-cholesterol through increased access to treatment for high-risk patients are projected to greatly reduce the growing clinical and economic burden of CVD in Turkey.