Fakülteler / Faculties

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1395

Browse

Filters

2022 - 20232

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Kocabas, UmutSubject: search.filters.subject.pulsatility index

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Effect of Aortic Valve Opening Pattern on Endothelial Function After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    (2023) Kaya, Ersin; Kocabas, Umut; Simsek, Evrim; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Engin, Cagatay; Ozbaran, Mustafa; Akilli, Azem; 0000-0001-6424-9399; 37773149; GXG-7709-2022
    This study aimed to evaluate the effects of aortic valve opening patterns on endothelial functions in patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. This study included 43 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation and 35 patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; control group). The CF-LVAD group was divided into three subgroups based on aortic valve opening patterns: open with each beat, intermittently opening, and not opening groups. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and pulsatility index (PI) were compared before and 3 months after CF-LVAD implantation. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and 6 minute walk test (6-MWT) scores were measured at baseline and follow-up in the CF-LVAD group. The mean FMD and PI of patients in the CF-LVAD group reduced 3 months after implantation. Patients with intermittently opening and not opening aortic valves had worse endothelial function at follow-up. Before and 3 months after implantation FMD% did not significantly differ in patients whose aortic valves were open with each beat (4.72 +/- 1.06% vs. 4.67 +/- 1.16%, p = 0.135). Pulsatility index changes paralleled FMD changes. Cardiopulmonary exercise test and 6-MWT scores improved after implantation but without significant differences between subgroups. Maintaining normal aortic valve function after CF-LVAD implantation may reduce endothelial dysfunction; however, larger studies are needed for long-term clinical effects.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Effects of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy on Peripheral Vascular Function
    (2022) Kaya, Ersin; Kocabas, Umut; Simsek, Evrim; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Kahraman, Umit; Engin, Cagatay; Yagdi, Tahir; Ozbaran, Mustafa; Akilli, Azem; 35089263; GXG-7709-2022
    The peripheral vascular effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation are still unclear. The aim of the current study was to determine peripheral vascular function before and after implantation of CF-LVAD in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), and to compare this data to age- and sex-matched chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. Forty-three consecutive end-stage HF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III/IV; three women and 40 men; mean age 53 +/- 11 years) who planned to receive CF-LVAD implantation comprised the LVAD patient population, and their clinical characteristics, preoperative and third postoperative month peripheral vascular function assessment data including flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and pulsatility index (PI) assessed by ultrasound Doppler in brachial artery were compared to age- and sex-matched chronic, stable HFrEF patients (NYHA class II; five women and 30 men; mean age 51 +/- 10 years). After CF-LVAD implantation, median FMD decreased from 5.4 to 3.7% (p < 0.001), and median PI decreased from 6.9 to 1.4 (p < 0.001). In patients with end-stage HF before CF-LVAD implantation, FMD and PI were significantly lower compared to the chronic HFrEF patients (FMD: 5.4% +/- 0.9% vs. 7.6% +/- 1.1%; p < 0.001, respectively) and (PI: 6.9 +/- 1.3 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.2; p = 0.023, respectively). The current study revealed impaired peripheral vascular function in the end-stage HF patients compared to stable HFrEF patients, and documented the deterioration of peripheral vascular function after CF-LVAD implantation. These results suggest that impaired peripheral vascular function in the CF-LVAD patients compared to preoperative assessment is a consequence of the nonpulsatile blood flow due to the continuous-flow mechanical support.