Fakülteler / Faculties

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1395

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 70
  • Item
    Oncologic and Obstetric Outcomes of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients Who Underwent Fertility-Sparing Surgery: A Retrospective Study
    (2023) Ayhan, Ali; Tunc, Mehmet; Atasoy Karakas, Latife; Tekelioglu, Tugba; Haberal Reyhan, Asuman Nihan; Onalan, Gogsen; Kuscu, Esra; 0000-0002-8646-0619; 0000-0001-7369-5470; 36825554; AAA-6962-2022; AAI-8793-2021
    ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the long-term oncologic and obstetric outcomes of women with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. MethodsA total of 68 patients observed between March 2007 and July 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and uterine preservation with staging surgery were the main procedures for fertility-sparing surgery. Disease-free, overall survival, and obstetric outcomes were measured as primary outcomes. ResultsThe median age of the patients was 30.5 years. The median follow-up time was 60.5 months. Disease recurrence occurred in 15 (22.1%) of the patients. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) percentages were 75.6% and 83.3%, respectively, for all stages. The FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology & Obstetrics) stage was the only significant factor that affected OS (P = 0.001). Twenty-three patients tried to conceive, and 15 (65.2%) patients became pregnant. Twelve (80%) pregnancies reached term and resulted in 15 live births. Chemotherapy administration and surgical intervention (cystectomy or unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) showed no difference in pregnancy results (P = 0.806 and P = 0.066, respectively). ConclusionFertility preservation is safe for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer at early stages for women in the reproductive era. Disease recurrence and OS results are similar to standard treatment at early stages with decent obstetric outcomes.
  • Item
    Survival Associated with Extent of Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Subanalysis of the Surveillance in Cervical Cancer (SCCAN) Collaborative Study
    (2023) Bizzarri, Nicolo; Querleu, Denis; Dostalek, Lukas; van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R. C. W.; Giannarelli, Diana; Lopez, Aldo; Salehi, Sahar; Ayhan, Ali; Kim, Sarah H.; Ortiz, David Isla; Klat, Jaroslav; Landoni, Fabio; Pareja, Rene; Manchanda, Ranjit; Kostun, Jan; Ramirez, Pedro T.; Meydanli, Mehmet M.; Odetto, Diego; Laky, Rene; Zapardiel, Ignacio; Weinberger, Vit; Dos Reis, Ricardo; Anchora, Luigi Pedone; Amaro, Karina; Akilli, Huseyin; Abu Rustum, Nadeem R.; Salcedo Hernandez, Rosa A.; Javurkova, Veronika; Mom, Constantijne H.; Scambia, Giovanni; Falconer, Henrik; Cibula, David; 37336255
    BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend tailoring the radicality of hysterectomy according to the known preoperative tumor characteristics in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether increased radicality had an effect on 5-year disease-free survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy. The secondary aims were 5-year overall survival and pattern of recurrence.STUDY DESIGN: This was an international, multicenter, retrospective study from the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative cohort. Patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IB1 and IIA1 who underwent open type B/C1/C2 radical hysterectomy according to Querleu-Morrow classification between January 2007 and December 2016, who did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy and who had negative lymph nodes and free surgical margins at final histology, were included. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed. Patients were stratified according to pathologic tumor diameter. Propensity score match analysis was performed to balance baseline characteristics in patients undergoing nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.RESULTS: A total of 1257 patients were included. Of note, 883 patients (70.2%) underwent nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy, and 374 patients (29.8%) underwent non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Baseline differences between the study groups were found for tumor stage and diameter (higher use of non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for tumors >2 cm or with vaginal involvement; P<.0001). The use of adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 27.3% vs 28.6%, respectively (P=.63). Five-year disease-free survival in patients undergoing nerve-sparing vs non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 90.1% (95% confidence interval, 87.9-92.2) vs 93.8% (95% confidence interval, 91.1-96.5), respectively (P=.047). Non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was independently associated with better disease-free survival at multivariable analysis performed on the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.81; P=.004). Furthermore, 5-year overall survival in patients undergoing nerve-sparing vs non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 95.7% (95% confidence interval, 94.1-97.2) vs non-nerve-sparing 96.5% (95% confidence interval, 94.3-98.7), respectively (P=.78). In patients with a tumor diameter <= 20 mm, 5-year disease-free survival was 94.7% in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs 96.2% in non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (P=.22). In patients with tumors between 21 and 40 mm, 5-year disease-free survival was 90.3% in non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs 83.1% in nerve sparing radical hysterectomy (P=.016) (no significant difference in the rate of adjuvant treatment in this subgroup, P=.47). This was confirmed after propensity match score analysis (balancing the 2 study groups). The pattern of recurrence in the propensity-matched population did not demonstrate any difference (P=.70).CONCLUSION: For tumors <= 20 mm, no survival difference was found with more radical hysterectomy. For tumors between 21 and 40 mm, a more radical hysterectomy was associated with improved 5-year disease free survival. No difference in the pattern of recurrence according to the extent of radicality was observed. Non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was associated with better 5-year disease-free survival than nerve sparing radical hysterectomy after propensity score match analysis.
  • Item
    Effects of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Combination on Mechanical Myocardial and Microvascular Functions: A Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography and Two-Dimensional Strain Imaging Study
    (2015) Altin, Cihan; Elif Sade, Leyla; Demirtas, Saadet; Karacaglar, Emir; Kanyilmaz, Suleyman; Simsek, Vahide; Ayhan, Ali; Muderrisoglu, Haldun; 24814007
    AimPaclitaxel and carboplatin are frequently used chemotherapy drugs in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Little is known about their effects on left ventricular mechanical and coronary microvascular functions. MethodsThirty consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before and after chemotherapy, to evaluate left ventricular mechanical functions and coronary flow reserve (CFR). A comprehensive TTE, tissue Doppler and two-dimensional (2D) strain imaging were performed and coronary flow velocity was measured at baseline and after dipyridamole infusion. CFR was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline diastolic peak flow velocities. Mitral annular velocities by tissue Doppler, peak strain, and systolic strain rate by velocity vector imaging (VVI) were measured. Baseline measurements were compared with healthy controls (n=26). ResultsNo patient developed heart failure (HF) symptoms, no significant change occurred in left ventricular ejection fraction or cardiac output and no significant difference was observed in CFR after chemotherapy. Baseline mean longitudinal peak strain and systolic stain rate were similar between patients and controls: -17.52.6% versus -17.6 +/- 2.2% (P=NS) and -1.04 +/- 0.14/sec versus -1.05 +/- 0.12/sec (P=NS). Peak strain and systolic strain rate decreased significantly after chemotherapy (from -17.5 +/- 2.6% to -16.2 +/- 2.5%, P<0.02; and from -1.05 +/- 0.12/sec to -0.96 +/- 0.11/sec, P=0.01, respectively). However, mean longitudinal velocity did not change significantly. ConclusionPaclitaxel and carboplatin combination did not impair CFR; however, this chemotherapy combination could induce subtle impairment in myocardial mechanical function which can be detected by advanced deformation imaging techniques rather than by tissue Doppler imaging or conventional 2D and Doppler echocardiography.
  • Item
    Is Colposcopic Evaluation Necessary in All Women with Postcoital Bleeding?
    (2015) Gulumser, Cagri; Tuncer, Aykut; Kuscu, Esra; Ayhan, Ali; 0000-0002-5434-1025; 0000-0002-0992-6980; 26254856; K-1760-2018; AAJ-5802-2021; AAI-8792-2021
    Objective: To evaluate what extent postcoital bleeding (PCB) is an indicator of cervical cancer (CIN2 (+)). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Between 2007 and 2013, amongst all referred patients, a total of 1491 consecutive women who had both conventional cytology and cervical biopsy were enrolled in the study. Of those 237 women have PCB, according to biopsy results, subjects were divided into two groups: CIN1 (-) and CIN2 (+). Multiple logistic regressions was used to construct a model to predict the occurrence of CIN 2 (+) based on age, menopause, marriage status, smoking, PCB, HPV and cytology. Results: Among the all women with CIN 2 (+) colposcopy guided biopsy result, PCB was 13.1% (53/406). The relationship between biopsy results and age, parity, menopausal status, marital status, smoking, presence of PCB, HPV DNA, and cytology is statistically significant (p = 0.012, p = 0.001, p = 0.023, 0.013, p > 0.001, p = 0.038, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). According to regression analysis only smoking, HPV (+) and abnormal cytology increase the probability of CIN2 (+); 1.687 times (p = 0.018), 4.065 times (p < 0.001), 5.787 times (p = 0.001) respectively. Having PCB only does not indicate an increased risk of CIN2 (+). Conclusion: Colposcopic examination and biopsy should be performed only in the situation where women have PCB and any of the following: smoking, positive HPV, or abnormal cytology. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
  • Item
    Assessing the Quality of Life in Patients with Endometrial Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Radiotherapy
    (2015) Karabuga, Havva; Gultekin, Melis; Tulunay, Gokhan; Yuce, Kunter; Ayhan, Ali; Yuce, Deniz; Yildiz, Ferah; 0000-0003-0440-0725; 26207785; AAJ-5802-2021
    Objective The current study evaluates long-term quality of life (QOL) and sexual function of patients with endometrial cancer who received adjuvant pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or vaginal brachytherapy (BRT). Materials and Methods One hundred forty-four endometrial cancer survivors who were treated between January 2000 and December 2009 in our department were included in this study. Median follow-up was 79 months (range, 31-138 months). Fifty-two patients were treated with 45 to 50.4 Gy EBRT, 76 were with BRT, and 16 were with both EBRT and BRT. Brachytherapy was in the form of vaginal cuff BRT with 5 x 550 cGy high dose rate BRT, prescribed to the first 4 cm and whole wall thickness of vagina. Quality of life was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and subscales from the supplemental 24-item Cervical Cancer Module. Results Vaginal BRT patients reported better physical functioning (P = 0.01), role functioning (P = 0.03), and sexual enjoyment (P = 0.01) compared to EBRT group. Symptom score (P = 0.01), lymphedema (P = 0.03), pain (P = 0.02), and diarrhea (P = 0.009) scores were also higher with EBRT. Vaginal BRT did not worsen symptom scores or sexual functions when added to EBRT. Obese patients experienced higher rates of lymphedema (P = 0.008). Cognitive and role functioning scores were significantly higher in patients with normal body mass index. Conclusions External beam radiotherapy negatively affects long-term QOL and sexual functions in endometrial cancer survivors. Vaginal BRT provides higher QOL. Patients with body mass index within normal limits have improved QOL.
  • Item
    Oncofertility for Gynecologic and Non-Gynecologic Cancers: Fertility Sparing in Young Women of Reproductive Age
    (2014) Dursun, Polat; Dogan, N. Utku; Ayhan, Ali; 25090914; AAJ-5802-2021
    About ten percent of all female cancer survivors is younger than 40 years of age. For these young women the primary goal is to ensure the highest possibility of cure and to maintain the reproductive functions as well. Oncofertility is a new concept including both oncology and reproductive medicine. By this recently defined concept young women will have maximal chance to make an optimal decision without any significant impact and delay in oncologic outcome. Oncofertility concept could be applied for genital cancer as well as non-genital cancer of reproductive age. Currently sperm and embryo banking are the standard methods used for young patients with cancer whose future fertility is under risk. In contrary oocyte banking, ovarian tissue cryopreservation are all controversial procedures and still accepted as experimental by many authors although American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) consideres oocyte cryopreservation "no longer experimental". For genital cancers procedures for oncofertility depends on the type of the cancer and the treatment of choice. In this review the current data and concepts regarding oncofertility concept including the gynecologic oncologic perspective is reviewed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • Item
    Clinicopathologic Features and the Loss of ARID1A Expression in Ovarian Seromucinous Borderline Tumors and Seromucinous Carcinomas
    (2023) Ok Atilgan, Alev; Ozen, Ozlem; Haberal Reyhan, A. Nihan; Ayhan, Ali; 36452965
    The current study highlighted the ARID1A and SALL4 expression and described histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of ovarian seromucinous tumors (SMTs) including borderline tumors (SMBTs) and seromucinous carcinomas (SMC; namely as endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation according to WHO 2020 classification). The clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of 38 SMTs were analyzed, including ARID1A, SALL4, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), TP53, keratin 7, keratin 20, CEA, CDX2, WT1, PAX2, and PAX8. SMCs and SMBTs comprised 68.4% (n = 26) and 31.6% (n = 12) of all SMTs, respectively, studied. The mean age of diagnosis was 47.4 years and 41.4 years, and the mean size was 9 cm and 7.45 cm for SMC and SMBT, respectively. There was endometriosis or endometriotic cyst in 61.5% of SMCs and 50% of SMBTs. Immunohistochemically, loss of ARID1A staining was observed in 15 (65.2%) of 26 SMCs, and 3 (33.3%) of the 12 SMBTs. Only one SMC showed focal SALL4 positivity. All SMTs were positive for ER, PR, PAX8, and keratin 7. SMTs were negative for WT1, keratin 20, CDX2, and CEA (negative in 66.7% to 92.3% of the cases). While all SMBTs and 24 (92.3%) of 26 SMCs exhibited "wild-type" TP53 staining, 2 (7.7%) SMCs, both were stage III, showed mutant type TP53 overexpression. We indicate there is a similarity between SMC and SMBT according to the immunohistochemical features. SMBTs are keratin 7, ER, PR positive tumors, and some of them have loss of ARID1A expression and are likely to develop in the background of endometriosis similar to SMC.
  • Item
    Fertility Sparing in Uterine Sarcomas: Single Center Experience of 13 Patients
    (2019) Tunc, Mehmet; Tohma, Yusuf Aytac; Sahin, Han Ifi; Akilli, Huseyin; Karakas, Latife Atasoy; Altundag, Ozden; Haberal, Ali; Ayhan, Ali; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9418-4733; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-8441; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7369-5470; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0197-6622; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-7209; AAE-6482-2021; AAX-3230-2020; AEY-5060-2022; W-9219-2019; AAI-9331-2021; AAJ-5802-2021
    Purpose of Investigation: The feasibility and safety of conservative surgery is not well defined for fertility sparing approach for uterine sarcoma due to very low incidence and poor prognosis. The authors present their experience regarding fertility preservation for uterine sarcoma. Materials and Methods: A total of 13 patients with uterine sarcoma were included in this retrospective case study; endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) (n=6) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (n=7). Patients data, including clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic information were extracted from medical records. Excision of mass and reconstruction of uterus was performed for fertility sparing in all patients and staging surgery (bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy +/- omentectomy) as performed for five cases (one ESS case and four LMS cases). Results: The median size of the mass was 8.5 (range: 1-22) cm. Median follow-up time was 54 (range 13-142) months. Recurrence rate was 69.2% (9/13). The mean relapse interval was 30.69 months. Four patients died and all of them was diagnosed with LMS. Four pregnancies (37%) were recorded. Two of them occurred with assisted reproductive technologies (intracytoplasmic sperm injection), the other two pregnancies were spontaneous, and all of them had a cesarean delivery. Conclusion: Patients should be informed about prognosis of uterine sarcomas and risk of fertility preserving approach. Close follow-up is obligatory and complementary surgery should be performed after completion of fertility due to high recurrence rate and poor prognosis especially with LMS.
  • Item
    Possible Impact of Immunosuppressive Therapy Regimens on Histopathologic Outcomes of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients
    (2018) Tohma, Yusuf Aytac; Akilli, Huseyin; Kirnap, Mahir; Haberal, Asuman Nihan; Akyel, Dilan; Zengin, Hatice Yagmur; Zeyneloglu, Hulusi Bulent; Kuscu, Esra; Ayhan, Ali; Haberal, Mehmet; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9418-4733; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-8441; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-9911; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-2449; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-2642; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-7632; 29851156; AAE-6482-2021; AAX-3230-2020; AAH-9198-2019; AAK-4587-2021; ABA-3224-2021; B-6487-2009; AAJ-8097-2021
    Background: In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency of histopathologic outcomes of solid-organ transplantation in women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Methods: This is a retrospective study including a single-center experience. Data were extracted from hospital records, and solid-organ transplant recipients who were diagnosed with AUB were included. Results: Fifty-five of these patients were renal transplant recipients (79.7%), and 14 were liver transplant recipients (20.3%). Histopathologic examination showed various histopathologic patterns of endometrium in patients with AUB consisting of normal histopathologic findings of endometrium in 31 patients (48.4%); 29 hormonal imbalance during proliferative and secretory phases of menstrual cycle and two atrophic endometrium. Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia was observed in 11 patients (17.2%). Polyp was seen in 22 patients (34.4%); 21 endometrial polyp and one endocervical polyp. There were significant differences in terms of histopathologic findings among the three groups of patients according to different immunosuppressive regimens (P = .029). There was no endometrial hyperplasia in women receiving sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens. Moreover, there was no endometrial hyperplasia in the liver transplant recipient group. Conclusions: Sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens may be administered to patients who have risk factors for endometrial precancerous lesions, such as endometrial hyperplasia. However, additional well-designed, large-scale studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
  • Item
    Gynecologic Oncologist Perspective About ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer
    (2017) Dursun, Polat; Ayhan, Ali; AAJ-5802-2021
    ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer was simultaneously published in 3 prestigious journals and is sure to have a huge impact on the clinical practice of gynecologic oncology community and other gynecologic cancer care providers. It is a tremendous report representative of great effort. Hovewer, as practicing gynecologic oncologists, endometrial carcinoma is the most common clinical entity encountered in our routine daily practice; as such, we find some of the report confusing and object to some of its findings, as detailed in this brief report. We also attempted to summarize the differences between the well-known NCCN guidelines and the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference guidelines and try to give the point of view of gynecologic oncologic perspective. It is obvious that differences in the management of endometrial carcinomas will continue to be debated by the scientific community.