Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4809

Browse

Filters

2019 - 201912020 - 20231

Settings

Subject: search.filters.subject.dermoscopy

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Strategies to improve the diagnosis and clinical treatment of dermatophyte infections
    (2023) Durdu, Murat; Ilkit, Macit; 36329574
    Introduction Significant problems are associated with the diagnosis and treatment of dermatophyte infections, which constitute the most common fungal infections of the skin. Although this is a common problem in the community, there are no adequate guidelines for the management of all forms of dermatophyte infections. Even if dermatophytes are correctly diagnosed, they sometimes exhibit poor susceptibility to several antifungal compounds. Therefore, long-term treatment may be needed, especially in immunosuppressed patients, for whom antifungal pharmacotherapy may be inconvenient owing to allergies and undesirable drug interaction-related effects. Areas covered In this review article, problems related to the diagnosis and treatment of dermatophyte infections have been discussed, and suggestions to resolve these problems have been presented. Expert opinion Pretreatment microscopic or mycological examinations should be performed for dermatophyte infections. In treatment-refractory cases, antifungal-resistant strains should be determined using antifungal susceptibility testing or via molecular methods. Natural herbal, laser, and photodynamic treatments can be used as alternative treatments in patients who cannot tolerate topical and systemic antifungal treatments.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    High accuracy of recognition of common forms of folliculitis by dermoscopy: An observational study
    (2019) Durdu, Murat; Errichetti, Enzo; Eskiocak, Ali Haydar; Ilkit, Macit; 0000-0003-1247-3932; 30914342; H-9068-2019
    Background: Clinical differentiation of folliculitis types is challenging. Dermoscopy supports the recognition of folliculitis etiology, but its diagnostic accuracy is not known. Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for folliculitis. Methods: This observational study included patients (N = 240) with folliculitis determined on the basis of clinical and dermoscopic assessments. A dermoscopic image of the most representative lesion was acquired for each patient. Etiology was determined on the basis of cytologic examination, culture, histologic examination, or manual hair removal (when ingrowing hair was detected) by dermatologist A. Dermoscopic images were evaluated according to predefined diagnostic criteria by dermatologist B, who was blinded to the clinical findings. Dermoscopic and definitive diagnoses were compared by dermatologist C. Results: Of the 240 folliculitis lesions examined, 90% were infections and 10% were noninfectious. Infectious folliculitis was caused by parasites (n = 71), fungi (n = 81), bacteria (n = 57), or 7 viruses (n = 7). Noninfectious folliculitis included pseudofolliculitis (n = 14), folliculitis decalvans (n = 7), and eosinophilic folliculitis (n = 3). The overall accuracy of dermoscopy was 73.7%. Dermoscopy showed good diagnostic accuracy for Demodex (88.1%), scabietic (89.7%), and dermatophytic folliculitis (100%), as well as for pseudofolliculitis (92.8%). Limitations: The diagnostic value of dermoscopy was calculated only for common folliculitis. Diagnostic reliability could not be calculated. Conclusion: Dermoscopy is a useful tool for assisting in the diagnosis of some forms of folliculitis.