Our Experience With Free Microvascular Tissue Transfer in Burn Reconstruction

dc.contributor.authorBurak Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorAbbas Albayati
dc.contributor.authorSuleyman Savran
dc.contributor.authorCem Aydogan
dc.contributor.authorCagri A. Uysal
dc.contributor.authorMehmet Haberal
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-16T07:11:16Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: Free microvascular tissue transfer can provide excess tissue in 1 stage for extensive injuries when locoregional flap options cannot be performed. Free flaps are an important reconstructive option in burn reconstruction whenever neurovascular and skeletal structures are exposed. This sophisticated technique needs surgical expertise and an understanding of burn physiology. Here, we have shared our experiences in burn reconstruction with free flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, our center performed 26 free flap procedures in 20 burn patients. Fifteen flaps were performed in 12 patients at an early phase (first 21 days postinjury); 11 free flaps were performed in 8 patients for postburn contracture sequelae. Among these procedures, 60% were skin flaps (anterior lateral thigh, radial forearm, superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap, parascapular), 20% were musculocutaneous flaps (latissimus dorsi, vastus lateralis), 10% were fascia flaps (temporal fascia, serratus anterior), and 10% were pure muscle flaps (gracilis, latissimus dorsi). RESULTS: Two free flaps for early-phase reconstruction and 1 free flap for postburn contracture release were lost. Reasons for flap loss were venous congestion in 2 cases, with arterial occlusion due to hematoma formation in 1 case. All patients with flap loss had high-voltage electric burns. Debridement of the necrotic flaps was delayed until demarcation formation settled and until subflap granulation formation started. Skin grafts were performed after debridement of these flaps. All other flaps survived, with no recurrence of contractures or defects encountered in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although free flaps have changed the reconstructive ladder to a reconstructive elevator, performing these flaps have unique challenges in burn reconstruction, such as risk of thrombosis in those with electric burns, hemodynamic instabilities, and difficulties in patient positioning due to sedation. Meticulous care should be taken and the patient’s general condition should be well evaluated before free flap surgery.
dc.identifier.citationBurn Care & Prevention, cilt 1, sayı 4, ss. 174-178en
dc.identifier.issn2757-7090
dc.identifier.issuesayı 4en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/13325
dc.identifier.volumecilt 1en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBaşkent Üniversitesi
dc.sourceBurn Care & Preventionen
dc.subjectBurn trauma
dc.subjectFree flap
dc.subjectReconstructive microsurgery
dc.titleOur Experience With Free Microvascular Tissue Transfer in Burn Reconstruction
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
pdfPreview11.pdf
Size:
284.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: