A Clinicoepidemiological and Outcome Analysis of 770 Burn Patients: A 5-Year Retrospective Study in a Private Sector Tertiary Burn Care Center in Indore, Central India
| dc.contributor.author | Rajpal Singh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shobha Chamania | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sunil Chandiwal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Deepak Tripathi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Deepika Jain | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ankit Mishra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tasvir Balar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Prashant Srivastava | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-19T07:17:57Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-09 | |
| dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: Burns are a global public health problem and one of the major causes of disability, with more than 8 million disability-adjusted life-years. Our aim was to contribute a comprehensive analyses of existing burn data from Central India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed secondary data of burn patients from 5 years (March 2016 to March 2021) from a single center (Choithram Hospital & Research Centre, India). All burn patients except those with nonhealing and old burn wounds were included. We examined the following: age, sex, socioeconomic status, type of burn, total burn surface area, comorbidities, treatment, and outcome, with data analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0. RESULTS: Our study included 770 patients (median age of 28.0 y). Male-to-female ratio was 1.26:1. Burns were common in the reproductive age group of 21 to 40 years (48.6%) and in people of a lower socioeconomic status (65.2%). There was predominance of flame burns (82.0%). The most common mode of burning was accidental (79.4%). The median (interquartile range) of total burn surface area among patients was 25% (12%-45%). Flame burns resulted in significantly greater injury (total burn surface area 30.0%) compared with electric (total burn surface area 23.0%) and scald burns (total burn surface area 11.5%). The commonest comorbidities were hypertension (5.2%) and diabetes (4.7%). We observed significant associations between outcome and age, sex, comorbidities, and treatment modalities. Homograft, autograft, or collagen/other dressing or a combination of these compared with conservative treatment resulted in better healing and reduced hospital stay (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Age, sex, type of burn, total burn surface area, comorbidities, and treatment modalities were significantly associated with outcome of burn patients. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Burn Care & Prevention, cilt 2, sayı 3, ss. 75-83 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2757-7090 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11727/13352 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | cilt 2 | en |
| dc.identifier.volume | sayı 3 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Başkent Üniversitesi | |
| dc.source | Burn Care & Prevention | en |
| dc.subject | Autograft | |
| dc.subject | Burn epidemiology | |
| dc.subject | Collagen dressing | |
| dc.subject | Homograft | |
| dc.subject | Mortality | |
| dc.title | A Clinicoepidemiological and Outcome Analysis of 770 Burn Patients: A 5-Year Retrospective Study in a Private Sector Tertiary Burn Care Center in Indore, Central India | |
| dc.type | Article |