Mortality Prediction After Kidney Transplantation: Comparative Clinical Use of 7 Comorbidity Indices

dc.contributor.authorShabir, Shazia
dc.contributor.authorBorrows, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Jason
dc.contributor.authorHe, Xiang
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xiang
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Atholl
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorInston, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorCockwell, Paul
dc.contributor.authorBall, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-01T07:00:31Z
dc.date.issued2011-02
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Despite comorbidity associated with chronic kidney disease, little data exist applying comorbidity scoring systems to renal transplant recipients. This study compared the performance of 7 established comorbidity scores in predicting mortality after kidney transplantation. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 2033 incident renal transplant recipients. Comorbidity was assessed at baseline, and the following scores were derived: Recipient Risk Score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, Modified End-Stage Renal Disease Charlson Comorbidity Index, Foley Score, Wright-Khan Index, and Davies Index. Cox models investigated the association of each comorbidity score with mortality; performance characteristics were tested using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Age-stratified Cox analyses showed the Recipient Risk Score-based model displayed the best fit, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the Recipient Risk Score demonstrated greatest predictive use (5-year mortality c-statistic: 0.787). The independent effect of age on mortality was demonstrated after analysis of scores not containing age as a component (the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the Modified End-Stage Renal Disease Charlson Comorbidity Index, the Davies Index); addition of age to these scores improved fit. Conclusions: Of the currently available comorbidity scores, the Recipient Risk Score demonstrated greatest use. This has implications for deceased-donor allocation algorithms, assessment of confounders in clinical research, and potentially, individual patient management.
dc.identifier.citationExperimental and Clinical Transplantation, Cilt, 9, Sayı, 1, 2011 ss. 32-41en
dc.identifier.eissn2146-8427en
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/14691
dc.identifier.volume9en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBaşkent Üniversitesi
dc.sourceExperimental and Clinical Transplantationen
dc.subjectPrediction
dc.subjectRecipient risk score
dc.titleMortality Prediction After Kidney Transplantation: Comparative Clinical Use of 7 Comorbidity Indices
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
32.pdf
Size:
252.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
32.pdf
Size:
252.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: