Mortality Prediction After Kidney Transplantation: Comparative Clinical Use of 7 Comorbidity Indices
| dc.contributor.author | Shabir, Shazia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Borrows, Richard | |
| dc.contributor.author | Moore, Jason | |
| dc.contributor.author | He, Xiang | |
| dc.contributor.author | Liu, Xiang | |
| dc.contributor.author | Johnston, Atholl | |
| dc.contributor.author | Little, Mark A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Inston, Nicholas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cockwell, Paul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ball, Simon | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-01T07:00:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-02 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Despite comorbidity associated with chronic kidney disease, little data exist applying comorbidity scoring systems to renal transplant recipients. This study compared the performance of 7 established comorbidity scores in predicting mortality after kidney transplantation. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 2033 incident renal transplant recipients. Comorbidity was assessed at baseline, and the following scores were derived: Recipient Risk Score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, Modified End-Stage Renal Disease Charlson Comorbidity Index, Foley Score, Wright-Khan Index, and Davies Index. Cox models investigated the association of each comorbidity score with mortality; performance characteristics were tested using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Age-stratified Cox analyses showed the Recipient Risk Score-based model displayed the best fit, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the Recipient Risk Score demonstrated greatest predictive use (5-year mortality c-statistic: 0.787). The independent effect of age on mortality was demonstrated after analysis of scores not containing age as a component (the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the Modified End-Stage Renal Disease Charlson Comorbidity Index, the Davies Index); addition of age to these scores improved fit. Conclusions: Of the currently available comorbidity scores, the Recipient Risk Score demonstrated greatest use. This has implications for deceased-donor allocation algorithms, assessment of confounders in clinical research, and potentially, individual patient management. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Experimental and Clinical Transplantation, Cilt, 9, Sayı, 1, 2011 ss. 32-41 | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2146-8427 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1304-0855 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11727/14691 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 9 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Başkent Üniversitesi | |
| dc.source | Experimental and Clinical Transplantation | en |
| dc.subject | Prediction | |
| dc.subject | Recipient risk score | |
| dc.title | Mortality Prediction After Kidney Transplantation: Comparative Clinical Use of 7 Comorbidity Indices | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: