TR-Dizin İndeksli Açık & Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10755
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Comparison of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and well-controlled warfarin in octogenarians with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Real-world data from a single tertiary center(2021) Akgun, Arzu Neslihan; Karacaglar, Emir; Bal, Uğur Abbas; Ozin, Mehmet Bulent; 34236320Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice, and its prevalence increases with age. Nevertheless, data about the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) among patients with >= 80 years remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in octogenarians with non-valvular AF (NVAF). Methods: Medical records of 387 patients who were >= 80 years and diagnosed with NVAF in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with NVAF were divided into 2 groups (NOACs and warfarin), and the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were analyzed. Results: A total of 322 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up duration was 10.9 months for the NOACs group and 12.1 months for the warfarin group. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke/systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. A total of 220 patients were taking NOACs, and the most preferred NOACs were apixaban (53.6%), rivaroxaban (29.5%), dabigatran (13.2%), and edoxaban (3.6%) in this order. During a mean follow-up of 302.7 patient-years, the incidence of stroke or systemic embolic events was slightly higher among patients with warfarin but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.862). The incidence rates of major bleeding events were similar between the treatment groups (p=0.824). Conclusion: Our study revealed that the safety and efficacy outcomes are similar between the 2 treatment groups in octogenarians with NVAF.Item Markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis do not detect or predict the presence of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation(2020) Doganozu, Ersin; Ciftci, Orcun; Hasirci, Senem; Yilmaz, Kerem Can; Karacaglar, Emir; Sade, Leyla Elif; Muderrisoglu, Ibrahim Haldun; Ozin, Mehmet Bulent; 0000-0002-2538-1642; 0000-0001-8926-9142; 0000-0002-8342-679X; 0000-0003-3737-8595; 32147650; ABI-6723-2020; W-5233-2018; AAK-7805-2021; AAJ-1331-2021; AAQ-7583-2021Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the role of hemostatic variables in arterial blood serum in left atrial thrombosis and to define any hemostatic variables, such as serum biomarkers, that could potentially reduce the need for transesophageal echocardiography. Method: This study included patients with non-valvular asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), either paroxysmal, persistent, or chronic. The presence of an left atrial appendix (LAA) thrombus was used to form 2 groups: thrombus (+) and thrombus (-). The serum levels of the thrombotic/fibrinolytic markers including beta-thromboglobulin, prothrombin fragment 1+2, thrombin/antithrombin complex, human plasminogen activator inhibitor-1/tissue plasminogen activator complex, and D-dimer were compared between 2 groups. Results: The mean age of the study population was 65.6 +/- 12.2 years (range: 30-96 years), and 33 (61.1%) patients were male. Fourteen (25.9%) patients had an LAA thrombus and 40 patients did not. Two groups did not differ significantly with regard to any of the coagulation/fibrinolysis markers. The LAA thrombus (+) group had significantly higher rates of heart failure, peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p<0.05). Neither the serum levels of the study markers nor demographic and clinical parameters were predictive of an LAA thrombus in binary logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: The arterial blood serum markers did not differ significantly between groups with and without an LAA thrombus and did not predict an LAA thrombus in patients presenting with AF.Item Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of acute decompensated heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation(2020) Kocabas, Umut; Sinan, Umit Yasar; Arugaslan, Emre; Kursun, Mustafa; Coner, Ali; Celebi, Ozlem Ozcan; Ozturk, Cengiz; Dalgic, Onur; Turkoglu, Ebru Ipek; Kemal, Hatice Soner; Gazi, Emine; Altin, Cihan; Zoghi, Mehdi; 32352420Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common cardiovascular diseases. The impact of AF on in-hospital outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is controversial. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of AF among hospitalized patients with ADHF and describe the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of these patients with and without AF. Methods: We examined the multicenter, observational data from the real-life data of hospitalized patients with HF: Journey HF-TR study in Turkey that studied the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of hospitalized patients with ADHF between September 2015 and September 2016. Results: Of the 1,606 patients hospitalized with ADHF, 626 (39%) had a history of AF or developed new-onset AF during hospitalization. The patients with AF were older (71 +/- 12 vs. 65 +/- 13 years; p<0.001) and more likely to have a history of hypertension, valvular heart disease, and stroke. The AF patients were less likely to have coronary artery disease and diabetes. In-hospital adverse event rates and length of in-hospital stay were similar in ADHF patients, both with and without AF. In-hospital all-cause mortality rate was higher in patients with AF than in patients without AF, although the difference was not statistically significant (8.9% vs. 6.8%; p=0.121). Conclusion: AF has been found in more than one-third of the patients hospitalized with ADHF, and it has varied clinical features and comorbidities. The presence of AF is not associated with increased adverse events or all-cause mortality during the hospitalization time.Item Antithrombotic treatment patterns and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in Turkey: Inferences from GARFIELD-AF registry(2019) Sayin, Begum Yetis; Okutucu, Sercan; Yilmaz, Mehmet Bircan; Ozdemir, Kurtulus; Aydinlar, Ali; Sahin, Durmus Yildiray; Altun, Armagan; Acikel, Sadik; Okuyan, Ertugrul; Sucu, Murat; Ongen, Zeki; Ersanli, Murat Kazim; Yilmaz, Ozcan; Demir, Mesta; Pekdemir, Hasan; Topsakal, Ramazan; Sahiner, Mehmet Levent; Aras, Dursun; Oto, Ali; 31062761; ABB-5844-2020Objective: The corner stone of atrial fibrillation therapy includes the prevention of stroke with less adverse effects. The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) study provided data to compare treatment strategies in Turkey with other populations and every-day practice of stroke prevention management with complications. Methods: GARFIELD-AF is a large-scale registry that enrolled 52,014 patients in five sequential cohorts at > 1.000 centers in 35 countries. This study was initiated to track the evolution of global anticoagulation practice, and to study the impact of NOAC therapy in AF. A total of 756 patients from 17 enrolling sites in Turkey were in cohort 4 and 5. Treatment strategies at diagnosis initiated by CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score, baseline characteristics of patients, treatment according to stroke and bleeding risk profiles, and INR values were analyzed in cohorts. Additionally, event rates during the first year follow up were evaluated. Results: AF patients in Turkey were mostly seen in young women. Stroke risk according to the CHADS(2) score and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score compared with world data. The mean of risk score values, including HAS-BLED score were lower in Turkey than in the world data. The percentage of patients receiving FXa inhibitor with or without an antiplatelet usage was more than the other drug groups. All-cause mortality was higher in Turkey. Different form world data when HAS-BLED score was above 3, the therapy was mostly changed to antiplatelet drugs in Turkey. Conclusion: In addition to deficiencies in available treatment options, patient care and clinical outcomes of patients with AF, the data of GARFIELD-AF provide data from Turkey about therapeutic strategies and best practices.