TR-Dizin İndeksli Açık & Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10755
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Treatment Outcomes of Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy(2018) Onal, Cem; Guler, Ozan Cem; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-9021; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-3412; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6661-4185; 30296648; HOC-5611-2023; AAC-5654-2020; V-5717-2017Background: To assess the outcomes of breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and systemic treatment. Materials and methods: Patients with oligometastasis at the time of liver metastasis (LM) or who became oligometastatic (<= 5 metastases) after systemic treatment were assessed. Twenty-nine liver metastatic lesions were treated with a total of 54 Gy delivered in 3 fractions. The local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: A total of 22 patients with 29 liver metastatic lesions treated with liver SBRT between April 2013 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. After a median follow-up time of 16.0 months (range 4.4-59.4 months), 18 patients (82%) had disease recurrence, median of 7.4 months (range 1.0-27.9 months) after completion of liver SBRT. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 85% and 57%, and the 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 38% and 8%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 100% and 88%, respectively. No significant prognostic factors, including disease extension, size of metastasis, number of liver metastasis and timing of liver metastasis, hormonal status affecting OS, PFS and LC were found. No patients experienced Grade 4 or 5 toxicity; furthermore, only one patient experienced rib fracture 6 months after completion of treatment, and one patient had a duodenal ulcer. Conclusion: This study is the first to evaluate the feasibility of SBRT to BCLM patients. Liver SBRT is a conservative approach with excellent LC and limited toxicities. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Item The Comparision of Breast Cancer in the Young and Elderly Patients(2019) Petek Erpolat, Ozge; Yuce Sari, Sezin; Ergen, Sefika Arzu; Aydin, Barbaros; Akkus, Berna; Gultekin, Melis; Copan Oksuz, Didem; Arican, Zumre; Onal, Cem; Gursel, Bilge; Akmansu, Muge; Ozyigit, Gokhan; Bilkay Gorken, Ilknur; Yildiz, FerahOBJECTIVE To compare the tumor characteristics, treatment approaches, recurrence patterns and survival results rates of young and elderly patients with breast cancer. METHODS In this study, Between between 2000-2013, a total of 779 patients were treated for breast cancer at nine radiation oncology departments were evaluated retrospectively. Three-hundred eight four of these patients were young (<= 35 years), and 395 of those the patients were elderly (>= 70 years). RESULTS Young patients were more likely to present with aggressive tumor features. They were more often received comprehensive lymphatic irradiation, tumor bed boost and intense chemotherapy. No difference was found for 5 and 10-year loco-regional recurrence- free survival rates were (96% and 93% for young, 97% and 97% for elderly). The 5 and 10-year distant recurrence- free survival rates were lower in the young patients (77% and 67% for young, 85% and 85% for elderly, p<0.0001). No difference was found in 5 and 10-year breast cancer- specific survival (91% and 79% for young, 92% and 87% for elderly). The 5 and 10-year overall survival rates were higher in the young patients (92% and 78% for young, 78% and 63% for elderly, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION The reason for the similarity between the age groups in terms ofregarding loco-regional recurrence- free survival can be more comprehensive lymphatic irradiation and tumor bed boost, the young patients received. The distant recurrence- free survival rates rates were significantly lower in the young patients even though they received more intensive chemotherapy. Future studies aimed at more effective systemic regimens to decrease distant recurrence in young patients are warranted.Item Effects of Setup Errors on Dose Distribution for Tangential Wedge Field and Field-in-Field Techniques During Breast Irradiation(2014) Sonmez, Aydan; Onal, Cem; Sonmez, Serhat; Arslan, Gungor; Parlak, Cem; Topkan, Erkan; Yavuz, MelekThis study is aimed to evaluate the effects of setup errors on dose distribution for target volume and healthy tissue within the irradiated volume and also critical surrounding organs for breast radiotherapy (RT) using both the tangential field and the field-in-field (FIF) technique. Ten patients with breast cancer were enrolled. For each patients two plans were generated; tangential field plan and FIF-plan. The setup errors were simulated for a series of displacements of +/- 5 mm and +/- 10 mm in superior-inferior (x-axis), medial-lateral (y-axis), and anterior-posterior (z-axis) directions and dose volume comparisons were made both between and within groups. The most prominent changes were observed in setup errors at z-axis. In wedge plan, 10-mm setup error at the +z axis caused a significant decrease in tumor coverage compared with the plan with no setup error (96.5% vs. 99.2%; p= 0.01). The 5 and 10 mm setup errors at the +z-axis resulted in significantly higher healthy tissue doses in wedge plans compared with FIF plans. The setup errors along z-axis had a significant effect on the dose distribution for target volume and also to the lungs. The setup error in the isocenter should be kept strictly below 5 mm.Item Prognostic Value of Metabolic Response Measured by FDG-PET-CT in Patients with Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy(2018) Guler, Ozan Cem; Torrun, Nese; Akkus Yildirim, Berna; Onal, Cem; 0000-0001-6908-3412; AAC-5654-2020OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of metabolic response measured by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) in patients with breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS The medical records of 17 patients with BCLM treated with SBRT between March 2013 and October 2017 were investigated retrospectively. Patients received SBRT for their liver metastasis, and thereafter, a second FDG-PET-CT was performed for response assessment in a median of 4.1 (2.2-8.2) months. A total of 54 Gy in three fractions were delivered to liver metastatic lesions. The standardized uptake value (SUV) and survival rates were evaluated. RESULTS After a median follow-up time of 11.5 (3.2-48.9) months, there was a significant difference between pre- and post-SBRT SUVs (p<0.001). Complete metabolic response was observed in 14 (82%) patients, partial metabolic response was observed in 2 (12%) patients, and stable metabolic disease/progressive metabolic disease was observed in 1 (6%) patient at post-treatment PET-CT. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 68% and 57%, respectively, and the 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 38% and 25%, respectively. CONCLUSION PET-CT is an effective tool for response monitoring in patients with BCLM treated with SBRT.