Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4806
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item National Multi-Center Observational Retrospective Study to Understand Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Turkey: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Study, STONE Trial(2022) Onal, Cem; Demiral, Ayse Nur; Atalar, Banu; Yalman, Deniz; Dagoglu, Nergiz; Hurmuz, Pervin; Erpolat, Petek; Akyurek, Serap; Gul, Sute Karabulut; Berber, Tanju; Guler, Ozan Cem; Umay, Cenk; Sert, Fatma; Karahacioglu, Eray; Birgi, Sumerya Duru; Yaprak, Gokhan; Saglam, Esra KaytanThis study investigated treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiotherapy (RT) in Turkey. We included 492 patients with stage III NSCLC in this multi-center retrospective study. Pa-tient demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical treatment patterns from the time of the initial diagnosis to disease progression were recorded. Additionally, the prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. For the initial treatment, 429 patients (89.2%) received chemotherapy and RT, whereas 53 patients (10.8%) were treated only with RT. The first disease progression occurred in 288 patients (58.4%) at 9.3 months (median) after the initial treatment, and 64.6% re-ceived treatment after first progression. The second disease progression occurred in 30 patients, and 20 patients (66.7%) received treatment. Median OS and PFS were 27.0 months and 13.4 months, respectively. Age (p< 0.001), stage (p= 0.04), poor performance score (PS) (p= 0.03) and RT doses (p= 0.002) were independent predictors for OS and PFS in our multivariate analysis. Additional significant predictors for OS in the multivariate analysis were gender (p= 0.004), treatment period (0.02), and irradiation technique (p= 0.02). Disease progression occurred in nearly 58% of the patients, and one-third of these patients remained untreated during the disease progression. These findings indicate a need for additional treatment options in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC with high-risk features, namely older age, stage IIIB disease, poor PS, and lower RT doses.Item Prediction of Peritoneal Recurrence in Patients with Gastric Cancer: a Multicenter Study(2020) Kus, Tulay; Kose, Fatih; Aktas, Gokmen; Arslan, Ulku Yalcintas; Sedef, Ali Murat; Cinkir, Havva Yesil; Dirikoc, Merve; Akkus, Gulsum; Ozdemir, Nuriye Yildirim; 0000-0002-0156-5973; 32578034; G-4827-2016Purpose The peritoneum is the common recurrence site of gastric cancer (GC) presenting with worse survival. Although some predictive clinicopathological factors have been identified, there is no comprehensive assessment of peritoneal recurrence risk prediction for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CR) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after surgery. We aimed to predict peritoneal recurrence and develop a new scoring model in GC. Methods This retrospective study included 274 GC patients who presented with recurrence after curative gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Risk factors for peritoneal recurrence were analyzed using the following parameters: age, gender, tumor location and characteristics, and differences between treatment modalities. All parameters were assessed by binary logistic regression analysis to compare the patients with and without peritoneal recurrence. Then, a new risk scoring model was developed. Results Peritoneal recurrence was observed in 115 (44.1%) patients. Peritoneal recurrence was higher in female gender (odds ratio (OR), 1.93; 1.07-3.49,P = 0.030, 1 point), T4a-b stage (OR, 2.47; 1.14-5.36,P = 0.022, 1 point), poor/undifferentiated (OR, 2.04; 1.31-4.06,P = 0.004, 1 point), and signet cell carcinoma (OR, 2.04; 1.04-4.02,P = 0.038, 1 point) after adjusted for resection and dissection types. The risk scoring model was developed using the related parameters: Peritoneal recurrence rates were 24.6%, 42.6%, and 71.4% for group 1 (0 point), group 2 (1-2 points), and group 3 (3-4 points), respectively. Conclusion Female gender, T4 tumor stage, undifferentiated histopathology, and signet cell type had a tendency to peritoneal recurrence after adjusted for treatment modalities. Patients with 3 or 4 risk factors had an 8.8-fold increased risk for the development of peritoneal recurrence.Item RAB25 confers resistance to chemotherapy by altering mitochondrial apoptosis signaling in ovarian cancer cells(2020) Temel, Sehime Gulsun; Giray, Asli; Karaka, Bahriye; Gul, Ozgur; Kozanoglu, Ilknur; Celik, Husnu; Basaga, Huveyda; Acikbas, Ufuk; Sucularli, Ceren; Oztop, Sidika; Aka, Yeliz; Kutuk, Ozgur; 0000-0001-5653-6080; 0000-0001-9854-7220; 0000-0002-5268-1210; 32901335; AAJ-7911-2020; AAH-1671-2019; AAE-1241-2021Ovarian cancer remains one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death in women. Many patients with ovarian cancer suffer from de novo or acquired resistance to chemotherapy. Here, we report that RAB25 suppresses chemotherapy-induced mitochondrial apoptosis signaling in ovarian cancer cell lines and primary ovarian cancer cells. RAB25 blocks chemotherapy-induced apoptosis upstream of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization by either increasing antiapoptotic BCL-2 proteins or decreasing proapoptotic BCL-2 proteins. In particular, BAX expression negatively correlates with RAB25 expression in ovarian cancer cells. BH3 profiling assays corroborated that RAB25 decreases mitochondrial cell death priming. Suppressing RAB25 by means of RNAi or RFP14 inhibitory hydrocarbon-stapled peptide sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy as well as RAB25-mediated proliferation, invasion and migration. Our data suggest that RAB25 is a potential therapeutic target for ovarian cancer.Item Surgical management and outcomes of metastatic tumors to the ovaries(2019) Rahatli, S.; Akilli, H.; Haberal, N.; Altundag, O.; Haberal, A.; Ayhan, A.Purpose of Investigation: Gynecologic and non-gynecologic tumors occasionally metastasize to the ovaries. Aim of this study was to describe the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with metastatic tumors to the ovaries. Materials and Methods: Between 2007-2017, 859 operations were performed in this center with initial diagnosis of ovarian mass. Seventy-five patients who had metastatic tumor to the ovaries in pathological examination were included the study. Results: Median overall survival of all patients was 26 +/- 5.9 months, three-year survival was 62%, and five-year survival was 37%. Patients who developed metachronous metastasis had better survival than patients who had synchronous metastasis (p = 0.05). Bilateral ovarian involvement was related with poor survival compared with unilateral involvement. Chemotherapy had beneficial effect on overall survival. Median survival in extensive surgery group was 30.9 months and it was better than minimal surgery group with 15.6 months, however it was not statistically significant (p= 0.973). Conclusion: The prognosis of the metastatic tumors to the ovaries is poor but achieving a complete resection and optimal debulking surgery may improve survival in some histologic subgroups.