Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4806

Browse

Filters

2015 - 20172

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Guler, Ozan C.Subject: search.filters.subject.Prognostic factor

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Correlation of Clinical Risk Factors with Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy
    (2015) Erbay, Gurcan; Onal, Cem; Guler, Ozan C.; Karadeli, Elif; Koc, Zafer
    This study is aimed to correlate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and clinical T-stage, serum PSA, pathology Gleason scores. We also further analyzed whether ADC values could be used to appropriately define the risk groups. 135 biopsy-proven, radiotherapy-(RT)-treated, prostate cancer patients who underwent pre-RT DW-MRI and standard T2W pelvic MRI were included. ADC and normalized ADC (nADC) values were calculated from DW-MRI delivered a median 8.1 weeks after prostate biopsy. ADC values were correlated with clinical risk factor values by using Pearson correlation test. ADCs in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were 0.873 +/- 0.122X10(-3) mm(2)/s, 0.763 +/- 0.124X10(-3) mm(2)/s, and 0.701 +/- 0.132X10(-3) mm(2)/s (p = 0.001), respectively. Patients with preRT PSA <10 ng/mL had significantly higher ADCs than patients with preRT PSA 10-20 ng/mL (p = 0.02) or >20 ng/mL (p < 0.001). Mean ADC for patients with Gleason score <7 was significantly higher than patients scoring 7 (p = 0.001) or >7 (p < 0.001). Clinical stage
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adjuvant Small Pelvic Radiotherapy in Patients with Cervical Cancer Having Intermediate Risk Factors Only - Is It Sufficient?
    (2017) Onal, Huseyin Cem; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Guler, Ozan C.; Gultekin, Melis; Yildiz, Ferah; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 28848218; D-5195-2014
    Background: We sought to determine the outcomes of adjuvant small pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and prognostic factors for survival and disease control. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 113 cervical cancer patients treated with postoperative median 50.4-Gy small pelvic EBRT. We treated the surgical bed, bilateral parametria, paravaginal soft tissues, upper third of the vagina, and presacral lymphatics. Results: Median follow-up of all patients and survivors was 58 and 67 months, respectively. The 2-and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates were 91 and 82%, and 85 and 74%, respectively. The locoregional failure rate was 10%. Age was a significant predictor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) on univariate analysis. The number of dissected lymph nodes being < 30 negatively affected the pelvic recurrence-free survival. The only independent predictor on multivariate analysis was older age for DMFS. Although no severe acute toxicity was observed, late grade >= 3 toxicity developed in 8 patients. Conclusion: Small pelvic EBRT produces satisfactory survival and locoregional control with acceptable toxicity, and can be an alternative to whole pelvic EBRT in selected cervical cancer patients. (C) 2017 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg