Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4806
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Outcome of Elderly Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Single Center Study(2020) Basaran, Hamit; Cengiz, Mustafa; Yazici, Gozde; Ozdemir, Yurday; Suslu, Nilda; Gullu, Ibrahim H.; Ozyigit, Gokhan; 0000-0002-2218-2074; AAG-5629-2021Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficiency of radiotherapy and evaluate its outcomes for elderly (> 65 years) patients who have undergone treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: Forty- five (male, 35; female, 10) elderly patients with a diagnosis of undifferentiated NPC who were treated at our institution between 1994 and 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the relationship between the patients' characteristics and overall survival (OS); progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional progression-free survival (LR-PFS), and toxicity analysis were the secondary endpoints. Results: The patients had a median age of 74.2 years. At a median follow-up period of 64 months, the median OS, PFS, and LR-PFS were 45 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.887-84.113), 34 (95% CI: 0.0-70.504), and 45 (95% CI: 20.092-69908) months, respectively. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 61.5%, 53.1%, and 50.0%, respectively, and the 2-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 57.6%, 46.8%, and 43.7%, respectively. Patients with T stage (T3-T4 vs.T1-T2) or N stage (N0-1 vs. N2) had significantly shorter OS (p<0.05), PFS (p<0.05), and LR-PFS (p<0.05) outcomes, respectively, which were also confirmed using a multivariate analysis (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that the established prognostic factors, including T and N stages, were important prognostic indicators of NPC in elderly patientsItem The role of delineation education programs for improving interobserver variability in target volume delineation in gastric cancer(2017) Onal, Cem; Cengiz, Mustafa; Guler, Ozan C.; Dolek, Yemliha; Ozkok, Serdar; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 28339289; D-5195-2014; AAC-5654-2020Objective: To assess whether delineation courses for radiation oncologists improve interobserver variability in target volume delineation for post-operative gastric cancer radiotherapy planning. Methods: 29 radiation oncologists delineated target volumes in a gastric cancer patient. An experienced radiation oncologist lectured about delineation based on contouring atlas and delineation recommendations. After the course, the radiation oncologists, blinded to the previous delineation, provided delineation for the same patient. Results: The difference between delineated volumes and reference volumes for pre-and post-course clinical target volume (CTV) were 19.8% (-42.4 to 70.6%) and 12.3% (-12.0 to 27.3%) (p = 0.26), respectively. The planning target volume (PTV) differences pre-and post-course according to the reference volume were 20.5% (-40.7 to 93.7%) and 13.1% (-10.6 to 29.5%) (p = 0.30), respectively. The concordance volumes between the pre-and post-course CTVs and PTVs were 467.1 +/- 89.2 vs 597.7 +/- 54.6cm(3) (p < 0.001) and 738.6 +/- 135.1 vs 893.2 +/- 144.6 cm(3) (p < 0.001), respectively. Minimum and maximum observer variations were seen at the cranial part and splenic hilus and at the caudal part of the CTV. The kappa indices compared with the reference contouring at pre- and post-course delineations were 0.68 and 0.82, respectively. Conclusion: The delineation course improved interobserver variability for gastric cancer. However, impact of target volume changes on toxicity and local control should be evaluated for further studies. Advances in knowledge: This study demonstrated that a delineation course based on current recommendations helped physicians delineate smaller and more homogeneous target volumes. Better target volume delineation allows proper target volume irradiation and preventing unnecessary normal tissue irradiation.