Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4806

Browse

Filters

2020 - 20212

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Altundag, OzdenSubject: search.filters.subject.Survival

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Survival impact of number of removed para-aortic lymph nodes in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer
    (2021) Gunakan, Emre; Akilli, Huseyin; Kara, Atacan Timucin; Altundag, Ozden; Haberal, Asuman Nihan; Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu; Ayhan, Ali; 0000-0002-5240-8441; 0000-0003-0197-6622; 0000-0001-8854-8190; 34410474; AAX-3230-2020; W-9219-2019; ABI-1707-2020
    Purpose The survival effect of presence or absence of lymphadenectomy in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) was priorly shown but the effect of number of removed lymph nodes kept in background. We aimed to evaluate the survival impact of number of removed lymph nodes and their localizations in stage I EOC. Methods This study included 182 patients. The best cut-off levels for number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes (PaLN) were 24 and 10, respectively. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed for these cut-offs and other prognostic factors. Results The median age of the patients was 49. The median number of removed pelvic and paraartic lymph nodes were 29 and 9, respectively. The median overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 67 and 50 months, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 89.6%. Recurrence occured in 24 (19.5%) patients. In univariate analyses tumor grade (p: 0.005), pelvic LN number (p: 0.041) and PaLN number (p: 0.004) were the factors that were significantly associated with PFS. Tumor grade and PaLN number were independently and significantly associated with PFS in multivariate analyses (p: 0.015 and p: 0.017, respectively). In OS analyses, age, tumor grade, presence of LVI, number of pelvic and PaLNs were the significantly associated factors (p < 0.05 for all). In multivariate analyses, age and PaLN number were independently and significantly associated with OS (p: 0.011 and p: 0.021, respectively). Conclusions The number and localizations of removed lymph nodes may have a survival affect in stage I EOC. We also think that this study may constitute a kernel point for larger prospective series on lymph node number and lymphatic regions.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Single-Center Experience of Recurrence Patterns and Survival Analyses of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Transplant
    (2020) Rahatli, Samed; Soy, Ebru H. Ayvazoglu; Oguz, Arzu; Altundag, Ozden; Moray, Gokhan; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0003-0197-6622; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0003-2498-7287; 0000-0003-3163-7429; 0000-0001-6512-6534; 0000-0002-0993-9917; 32279656; W-9219-2019; AAJ-8097-2021; AAE-1041-2021; AAJ-3047-2021; W-8004-2019; AAC-5566-2019
    Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a major health problem with increased rates of mortality. The curative treatment options are resection or liver transplant. Because the Milan criteria are restrictive for candidates, they have been expanded into alternative sets of criteria. We aimed to evaluate our indications for liver transplant and their results for hepatocellular carcinoma. Materials and Methods: Between December 1988 and January 2020, we performed 652 liver transplant procedures (443 living donors, 209 deceased donors) at Baskent University (Ankara, Turkey). At Baskent University, we developed liver transplant criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. For our criteria, liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma was performed in patients without major vascular invasion and distant metastasis. Clinical data on cancer demographics, recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Of 652 total patients, 49 adult patients (8%) with diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma were included in this study. Median age was 55 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplant was detected in 13 patients. Median overall survival was 64.3 months for all study patients; however, median survival was significantly lower in patients who had recurrence (126.3 vs 43.4 mo for nonrecurrent vs recurrent groups; P = .024). In the expanded criteria group (n = 25), 7 patients (28%) had hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence during follow-up, whereas this ratio was 25% (6/24 patients) in the Milan criteria group, with median time to recurrence of 12.6 versus 11.7 months, respectively (not significantly different). Conclusions: Multidisciplinary treatment modalities, including surgery, interventional radiology techniques, and medical treatments, will probably lead to prolonged survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. According to our center's expanded criteria, recurrence rates and time to recurrence were similar to those shown with the Milan group. We showed that Milan criteria can be safely expanded with promising results even in patients beyond Milan criteria.