Wos İndeksli Açık & Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10751
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Spinal anesthesia in surgical treatment of lumbar spine tumors(2020) Ogrenc, Ahmet; Akar, Ezgi; Koban, Orkun; Isik, Semra; Sener, Mesut; Yilmaz, Mesut; Dalbayrak, Sedat; 32619901Objective: This study aims to show the feasibility of spinal anesthesia in lumbar spinal tumor surgery; share our data and experience. Patients and methods: : A retrospective review of 14 patients with high risk for general anesthesia due to severe comorbidities was carried out. Patients who underwent surgeries under spinal anesthesia for lumbar vertebral column or spinal cord tumors at a single center between 2007-2019 were evaluated. The final pathological diagnosis, operation time, and surgical procedures were analyzed. Also, preoperative and postoperative ad-vantages and disadvantages were determined. A comparison was performed with other 184 patients who were operated for spinal tumors in the same period under general anesthesia. Results: Maximum operation time was found 220 min, and the average operation time was 166 min. The most primary diagnosis was vertebral column metastasis. The mean age was 65.5 years. None of the patients required general anesthesia during surgery; however, two patients needed additional spinal anesthesia preoperatively, which was performed by the surgeon. Lumbar decompression and fusion were the most performed procedures. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is a feasible and useful method of anesthesia in lumbar spinal tumor surgery for especially elderly patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 or 4 score and high risk of general anesthesia.Item Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer(2019) Ayhan, Ali; Aslan, Koray; Oz, Murat; Tohma, Yusuf Aytac; Kuscu, Esra; Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu; 0000-0001-9418-4733; 31263988Objective This dual-institutional, retrospective study aimed to determine the clinicopathological risk factors for para-aortic lymph node (LN) metastasis among women who underwent radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for 2009 FIGO stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer. Methods Institutional cervical cancer databases of two high-volume gynecologic cancer centers in Ankara, Turkey were retrospectively analyzed. Women with 2009 FIGO stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer that had undergone radical hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy between January 2006 and December 2018 were included in the study. Patient data were analyzed with respect to para-aortic LN involvement and all potential clinicopathological risk factors for para-aortic LN metastasis were investigated. Results A total of 522 women met the inclusion criteria. Pelvic LN metastasis was detected in 190 patients (36.4%), para-aortic LN metastasis in 48 patients (9.2%), isolated para-aortic LN metastasis in 4 (0.8%), and both pelvic and para-aortic LN metastasis in 44 (8.4%) women, respectively. The independent risk factors identified for para-aortic LN involvement included parametrial invasion (odds ratio [OR]: 3.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65-7.72; p = 0.001), metastasized pelvic LN size > 1 cm (OR: 4.51, 95% CI: 1.75-11.64; p = 0.002), multiple pelvic LN metastases (OR: 3.83, 95% CI: 1.46-10.01; p = 0.006), and common iliac LN metastasis (OR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.01-8.68; p = 0.04). A total of 196 (37.5%) patients exhibited at least one risk factor for para-aortic nodal disease. Conclusion Parametrial invasion, metastasized pelvic LN size > 1 cm, multiple pelvic LN metastases, and common iliac LN metastasis seem to be independent predictors of para-aortic LN involvement.Item Outcome of loco-regional radiotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate(2019) Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Onal, Cem; Kose, Fatih; Oymak, Ezgi; Sedef, Ali Murat; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Aksoy, Sercan; Guler, Ozan Cem; Sumbul, Ahmet Taner; Mualloglu, Sadik; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Ozyigit, Gokhan; 30701292Purpose To evaluate the potential benefit of curative radiotherapy (RT) to the primary tumor in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone. Materials and methods The clinical parameters of 106 mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were either oligometastatic (<= 5 metastases) at diagnosis or became oligometastatic after the systemic treatment was analyzed. Local RT to the primary tumor and pelvic lymphatics was delivered in 44 patients (41%), and 62 patients (59%) did not have RT to the primary tumor. After propensity match analysis, a total of 92 patients were analyzed. Resultsn Median follow-up time was 14.2 months (range: 2.3-54.9 months). Median overall survival (OS) was higher in patients treated with local RT to the primary tumor than in those treated without local RT with borderline significance (24.1 vs. 21.4 months; p=0.08). Local RT to the prostate and pelvic lymphatics significantly diminished the local recurrence rate (16 patients, 31% vs. 2 patients, 5%; p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, the prostate specific antigen (PSA) response >= 50% of the baseline obtained 3 weeks after abiraterone therapy was the only significant prognostic factor for better OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Patients treated with primary RT to the prostate had significantly less progression under abiraterone and a longer abiraterone period than those treated without local prostate RT. Conclusions Local prostate RT significantly improved OS and local control in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. The patients treated with primary RT had significantly less progression under abiraterone and a longer abiraterone period than those treated without local prostate RT.