Wos İndeksli Açık & Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10751

Browse

Filters

2019 - 20202

Settings

Has files: NoSubject: search.filters.subject.gastric cancer

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Concurrent versus sandwich treatment in adjuvant treatment in high risk operated gastric cancer: A single center experience
    (2020) Sezer, Ahmet; Akkus, Berna; Guler, Ozan Cem; Onal, Huseyin Cem; Sumbul, Ahmet Taner; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 33277854; AAC-5654-2020; D-5195-2014
    Purpose: In this study we compared postoperative early vs sandwich chemoradiotherapy in operated stage IIA-IIIC gastric cancer patients in terms of effectiveness and outcome. Methods: The data of 201 gastric cancer patients treated in the same center between December 2006 and June 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. One hundred forty nine patients who were eligible for the study criteria were divided into two groups according to the postoperative treatment modality. The first group included 85 patients who were given chemoradiotherapy simultaneously (ETG) and the second group icluded 64 patients who received sandwich (chemotherapychemoradiotherapy-chemotherapy) (STG) treatment. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated as primary endpoints. Results: The median follow-up time for all patient groups was 26.7 months (1.3-136.5 months). Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were initiated concurrently in patients receiving concomitant therapy. Half of the planned chemotherapy, then chemoradiotherapy and then the remaining chemotherapy treatments were given to the sandwich treatment group. A total of 50.4 Gy radiotherapy was given to the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group and a total of 45 Gy radiotherapy to the group receiving the sandwich treatment. OS was 30.6 months (23.7-37.5) in all groups, 30.4 months (23.7-35.0) in concurrent therapy (ETG) and 35.6 months (26.3-45) in sandwich therapy (STG) (p=0.73). DFS was 26.6 months (21.3-32.0) in all groups and 24.5 months (18.1-31.0) in the group receiving ETG, 32.5 months (22.242.8) in STG. (p=0.46). The most common grade 3 and above toxicities were; acute upper gastrointestinal toxicity (19.1% in ETG vs. 9.0% in STG, p=0.01) and hematological toxicity (31.8% in ETG vs. 13.9% in STG; p=0.002). Early cessation of treatment was similar in both groups. In multivariate analysis, female gender (p=0.01), stage III disease, grade III disease were seen as negative predictive factors for overall survival. In DFS multivariate analysis, there was no difference between the groups in terms of gender, T stage, N stage, and AJCC stage. Conclusion: In this study, superiority of sandwich treatment over concurrent treatment was observed in patients with operated stage IIB-IIIC gastric cancer, but the difference was not statistically significant. If this study is performed in larger patient series, the difference of sandwich treatment may become meaningful.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Is Human Papillomavirus and Helicobacter pylori Related in Gastric Lesions?
    (2019) Bozdayi, GUlendam; Dinc, Bedia; Avcikucuk, Havva; Turhan, Nesrin; Altay-Kocak, Aylin; Ozkan, Secil; Ozin, Yasemin; Bostanci, Birol; 31625359
    Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV), the causative agent of cervical cancer, is also suggested as a risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma. Many infectious agents besides Helicobacter pylori have been associated with gastritis. The aim of this study was to investigate HPV DNA and genotyping HPV type 16 DNA in gastric adenocarcinoma and Helicobacter pylori gastritis cases. Methods: A hundred and six gastric adenocarcinoma and Helicobacter pylori gastritis samples and 26 controls were included. After deparaffinization by xylene, DNA extraction was performed by the phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol method and 106 samples were studied with a G6PDH control kit (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium). Fifty-three adenocarcinoma and 43 Helicobacter pylori samples were thought to have enough tissue and were studied for HPV DNA. HPV types other than 16 and HPV type 16 DNA were detected by Real Time PCR using the L1 region. Amplifications of MY09/11 products were done by GP5+/GP6+ primers and Cyanine-5 labeled HPV DNA and HPV 16 DNA specific probe in Light Cycler 2.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) device. Results: Among gastric adenocarcinoma and Helicobacter pylori gastritis samples, 20/53 (38%) and 18/43 (41.8%) were HPV DNA positive, respectively. Five (19.2%) of 26 controls were HPV DNA positive. Conclusions: Our 38% positive result in the gastric carcinoma group is in concordance with previous reports. This is the first study revealing the HPV-H. pylori relationship in gastritis cases and we concluded that with regard to the nearly three-fold higher HPV DNA (41.8%) in gastritis cases compared to controls, Helicobacter pylori positive cases should also be evaluated in favor of HPV in the gastritis group.