Wos İndeksli Açık & Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10751

Browse

Filters

2014 - 20173

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Yel, CihatSubject: search.filters.subject.Emergency

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The value of Serum BNP for diagnosis of intracranial injury in minor head trauma
    (2014) Demir, Ali; Kavalci, Cemil; Yilmaz, Muhittin Serkan; Yilmaz, Fevzi; Durdu, Tamer; Ceyhan, Mehmet Ali; Alagoz, Fatih; Yel, Cihat
    Objective: Head injury is the main cause of death among individuals younger than 45 years old. Cranial Computerized tomography (CT) is commonly used for diagnosis of head injury. Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) is a peptide originally isolated from brain ventricles. The main aim of this study is to investigate BNP as an indicator of head injury among patients presenting to emergency department (ED) with minor head trauma. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted at the emergency department of the Numune Training and Research Hospital. A total of 162 patients who presented to the ED with minor head injury were enrolled. The patients were categorized into 2 groups as the cranial CT-negative and positive groups. The normality of the data was tested using One Sample Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare 2 independent groups while the Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized for comparison of more than 2 groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: Ninety-six (59.3%) patients were male and 66 (40.7%) were female. The cranial CT-negative group had a median BNP level of 14.5 pg/ml while the cranial CT-positive group had a median BNP level of 13 pg/ml. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups for serum BNP levels (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This study suggested that serum BNP level wasn't used in defined of intracranial injury.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparison of the Canadian CT head rule and the new orleans criteria in patients with minor head injury
    (2014) Kavalci, Cemil; Aksel, Gokhan; Salt, Omer; Yilmaz, M. Serkan; Demir, Ali; Kavalci, Gulsum; Ozel, Betul Akbuga; Altinbilek, Ertugrul; Durdu, Tamer; Yel, Cihat; Durukan, Polat; Isik, Bahattin
    Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the New Orleans Criteria and the New Orleans Criteria according to their diagnostic performance in patients with mild head injury. Methods: The study was designed and conducted prospectively after obtaining ethics committee approval. Data was collected prospectively for patients presenting to the ED with Minor Head Injury. After clinical assessment, a standard CT scan of the head was performed in patients having at least one of the risk factors stated in one of the two clinical decision rules. Patients with positive traumatic head injury according to BT results defined as Group 1 and those who had no intracranial injury defined as Group 2. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 11.00 for Windows. ROC analyze was performed to determine the effectiveness of detecting intracranial injury with both decision rules. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 175 patients enrolled the study. Male to female ratio was 1.5. The mean age of the patients was 45 +/- 21,3 in group 1 and 49 +/- 20,6 in group 2. The most common mechanism of trauma was falling. The sensitivity and specificity of CCHR were respectively 76.4% and 41.7%, whereas sensitivity and specificity of NOC were 88.2% and 6.9%. Conclusion: The CCHR has higher specificity, PPV and NPV for important clinical outcomes than does the NOC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Analysis of the patients admitted to emergency department due to urogenital trauma and investigation of factors that affect mortality
    (2017) Kavalci, Cemil; Sozen, Semih; Celik, Simsek; Akpinar, Cafer; Guven, Fatma Mutlu Kukul; Yel, Cihat; Sait, Omer
    Objective: To determine the general characteristics of urogenital trauma, and the factors that impact on mortality. Methods: Patients who were over 18 years of age admitted to the emergency service with urogenital injury between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Age, gender, type of trauma, injured urogenital organs, vital parameters, additional organ injuries and mortality rate were investigated. Categorical variables were compared by using Chi-square test and comparing to groups data were performed with the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The median age of 174 patients was 35 years (interquartile range: 22), and 150 patients (86.2%) were males. It was determined that the incidence of urogenital trauma increased in August and September. The kidney was the most frequently injured organ (41.4%) and the most common cause of injury was traffic accidents (49.4%). Mean arterial pressure and revised trauma score were the lowest while pulse rate was the highest in renal trauma patients (P < 0.05). Mean arterial pressure, revised trauma score and respiratory rate were low in mortal group while pulse rate and Glasgow coma scale scores were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Conclusions: It is determined that the most common injured organs in trauma patients are kidneys and bladder and also no single factor is effective on mortality.