Wos İndeksli Açık & Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10751

Browse

Filters

20202

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Oduncuoglu, Bahar FusunSubject: search.filters.subject.periodontics

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
    (2020) Oduncuoglu, Bahar Fusun; Yamanel, Kivanc; Kocak, Zahire Sahinoglu; 0000-0003-0647-9481; 32284897; AAQ-4792-2020
    Objective: Sonic and ultrasonic instrumentations generate vibrations that may influence debonding characteristics. The objective of this in vitro study was to assess the direct and indirect effects of sonic and ultrasonic periodontal instrumentations on the shear bond strength (SBS) and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores of metallic orthodontic brackets. Methods: Metallic brackets were bonded to 75 extracted mandibular central incisors that were embedded in acrylic resin. Instrumentations around the bracket base performed with ultrasonic (UltrasonicB group, n=15) and sonic (SonicB group, n=15) scalers were used to evaluate the direct effects on the SBS of brackets. Lingual surface instrumentations with ultrasonic (UltrasonicL group, n=15) and sonic (SonicL group, n=15) scalers were performed to assess the indirect effects. The control group (n=15) did not have any treatment. Instrumentations were performed for 30 s with 0 degrees scaler tip angulations with settings recommended by manufacturers. The SBS of the brackets tested with a universal testing machine and ARI scores were recorded. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The mean SBS of the control group was significantly higher than that of the UltrasonicB and SonicB groups (p=0.008). The UltrasonicL and Sonicl group instrumentations also decreased the SBS, although the difference was statistically insignificant. Ultra-sonicB instrumentations caused significantly higher frequency of ARI scores than the control group. Conclusion: The decrease of the SBS of metallic brackets indicates the influence of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentations on the breakage behavior at the bracket-resin interface. Instrumentations around the bracket base should be conducted with caution to decrease the bond failure risk of metallic brackets.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Evaluation of patients' perception of gingival recession, its impact on oral health-related quality of life, and acceptance of treatment plan
    (2020) Yilmaz, Merve; Oduncuoglu, Bahar Fusun; Nisanci Yilmaz, Mediha Nur; 0000-0003-0647-9481; 0000-0002-6410-2060; 32379509; AAQ-4792-2020
    Objective: Gingival recessions (GR) may cause aesthetic and hypersensitivity complaints which might affect oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients' awareness of their own GR, the impact of GR on OHRQoL and the acceptance of suggested treatment modalities. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 205 patients. The demographic variables were recorded and patients' perception of GR was questioned. Full-mouth examination was carried out and clinical parameters were recorded. Gingival recessions, GR related complaints were evaluated and GR treatments were suggested and acceptance were also recorded by the examiner. The patients filled out OHRQoL-United Kingdom (OHRQoL-UK) questionnaire regarding to their GR and were asked if GR have/would have impact on oral health and if the GR will/would get worsen. Data was analysed with independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: 4819 teeth were evaluated and 733 GR examined in 147 patients. Fifty-seven patients were unaware of their GR. A strong belief that GR have impact on oral health (88.78%) and GR will progress (86.34%) was detected. Acceptance of treatment was increased and non-invasive modalities were preferred if patients had complaints. The awareness of GR status increases and the misperception decreases the OHRQoL-UK scores. The results revealed that hypersensitivity decreases the OHRQoL-UK scores and aesthetic concerns and hypersensitivity decreases the OHRQoL-UK physical scores significantly (p < .05). Conclusions: The results indicated that the patients might be unaware of their GR and the GR related factors may lead to poorer OHRQoL.