Wos İndeksli Açık & Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10751
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item A new multidimensional process type FMEA approach: Defense and aerospace industry application(2022) Uslu, Tugce; Can, Gulin Feryal; Delice, Elif KilicPurpose: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), one of the most used methods in the literature, is a powerful risk assessment tool. However, it has many weaknesses that need to be improved. In this study, in order to increase the efficiency of using FMEA; a new multidimensional process type FMEA (MDPT-FMEA) approach is proposed. Theory and Methods: The MDPT-FMEA approach consists of three stages. At the first stage, Entropy, Preference Selection Index (PSI) and Criteria Importance through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) methods were used in the weighting of the risk criteria (RC). The different criteria weights obtained from these three different weighting methods were combined using the geometric mean operator and the integrated (final) weights were calculated. In the second stage, Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), Combinative Distance-based Assessment (CODAS), Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) to prioritize failure modes (FMs) were used. In the third stage, different FM priorities obtained from these three different ranking methods were combined using the Technique of Precise Order (TPOP) method. Results: The proposed MDPT-FMEA approach has been applied in a company operating in the defense and aerospace industry to evaluate the process-based FMs that may arise. In this study, different perspectives of different weighting and ranking methods are reflected in final criteria weights and final FM rankings. Conclusion: For the first time, different weighting and different ranking methods are combined in FMEA. As a result of the Spearman Correlation Coefficient calculation, the validity of both of the final criteria weights obtained and the final FM rankings were discussed.Item A novel aggregated multiple criteria decision-making approach to evaluate the physical workload of workers(2021) Ekinci, Elmas Burcu Mamak; Can, Gulin Feryal; AAE-4242-2020Physical workload (PWL) is a measure of the physical resources consumed by a worker while performing a task. Analyzing the PWL of workers can aid experts in identifying workers whose working conditions should be improved. Identifying workers who are exposed to the highest PWL is essential for task continuity and occupational health. In this study, a new approach is proposed to prioritize workers according to their PWL levels. In the proposed approach, multiple criteria decision-making techniques are used because different factors can affect PWL levels. Eight criteria, that is, standard time, frequency of working posture, heart rate, the risk level of posture, noise level, lighting intensity, rest period, and perceived workload level are considered. In the evaluation process, criteria weights are computed using entropy considering measurements of the eight criteria for each worker. Using these weights in multiobjective optimization by simple ratio analysis, multiobjective optimization by ratio analysis, and multiattributive ideal-real comparative analysis methods, workers are ranked according to their PWL levels. The final order of workers is determined by aggregating different rankings obtained from these three methods, using the technique of precise order preference method. This study presents original research that can potentially contribute to the literature by considering different perspectives offered by various methods for PWL evaluation. It focuses on several different criteria by performing real measurements and subsequently ranking workers based on the aggregation of these measurements.Item A new approach for ergonomic risk assessment integrating KEMIRA, best-worst and MCDM methods(2020) Delice, Elif Kilic; Can, Gulin FeryalIn this study, a new three-phase ergonomic risk assessment approach was proposed for manual lifting tasks to determine which worker has the highest ergonomic risk level considering two criteria sets as lifting-related criteria and human-related criteria. In the first phase, Modified Kemeny Median Indicator Ranks Accordance (KEMIRA-M) and a novel two-dimensional best-worst method (BWM) integration were proposed for weighting ergonomic risk criteria in two sets. In this way, weighting procedure of KEMIRA-M was advanced by the proposed two-dimensional BWM in a consistent manner and subjectivity in determining the best and the worst criteria in traditional BMW was prevented by using KEMIRA-M. Thus, the weaknesses of both methods have been developed. In the second phase, the rankings of workers were determined via utilizing multi-objective optimization on the basis of simple ratio analysis, multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis (MOORA) ratio, MOORA reference point and complex proportional assessment to see how worker rankings differ despite using the same advanced weighting approach based on KEMIRA-M and two-dimensional BWM integration. Finally, to aggregate these different ranking results, technique of precise order preference was applied. In this way, different viewpoints of each ranking approach can be reflected on a single worker's priority. The applicability of the proposed ergonomic risk assessment approach was demonstrated with a real application in tube manufacturing.