Scopus İndeksli Açık & Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10752

Browse

Filters

2020 - 20224

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Topkan, ErkanSubject: search.filters.subject.prognosis

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    High Measures of Pre-Chemoradiotherapy Platelet-to-Albumin Ratio Indicates Poor Prognosis in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients
    (2022) Kucuk, Ahmet; Topkan, Erkan; Selek, Ugur; Haksoyler, Veysel; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Pehlivan, Berrin; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-7123; 35444422; AAG-2213-2021
    Purpose: In a lack of similar research, we meant to retrospectively investigate the prognostic significance of pre-chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT) platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR) on the survival results of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) patients. Patients and Methods: The present analysis included 139 LAPC patients who received C-CRT in total. The utility of pre-C-CRT cutoff(s) reshaping survival data was explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary and secondary objectives were the associations between PAR levels and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes. Results: At a median follow-up of 15.7 months (95% CI: 11.6-19.8), the overall cohort's median and 5-year OS rates were 14.4 months (95% CI: 11.8-17) and 14.7%, respectively, while the corresponding PFS rates were 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.5-9.1) and 11.2%. Because the ROC curve analysis found 4.9 as the optimal PAR cutoff for both OS and PFS [area under the curve (AUC): 75.4%; sensitivity: 72.4%; specificity: 70.3%], we divided the patients into two PAR cohorts: PAR<4.9 (N=60) and PAR>4.9 (N=79). Comparative analysis per PAR group exhibited significantly worse OS (11.2 vs 18.6 months, and 9.8% vs 20.9% at 5 years, P=0.003) and DFS (7 vs 14.3 months, and 7.6% vs 16.2% at 5 years, P=0.001) with PAR>4.9 versus PAR<4.9, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the N0 nodal status, CA 19-9 <= 90 U/mL, and PAR<4.9 were found to be independent predictors of improved OS and PFS. Conclusion: The pre-C-CRT high PAR (>4.9) robustly and independently prognosticated significantly worse OS and PFS results in inoperable LAPC patients who underwent definitive C-CRT.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Low Pre-Chemoradiotherapy Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) Measures Predict Better Survival Outcomes in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas
    (2022) Topkan, Erkan; Selek, Ugur; Kucuk, Ahmet; Pehlivan, Berrin; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0001-8087-3140; 36158517; AAG-2213-2021
    Objective: This study sought to determine whether pretreatment pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) could be used to predict prognosis in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC) following definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT). Methods: The outcomes of 178 LA-PAC patients who received definitive C-CRT were analyzed retrospectively. For all patients, the PIV was calculated using the peripheral blood platelet (P), monocyte (M), neutrophil (N), and lymphocyte (L) counts obtained on the first day of C-CRT: PIV=PxMxN divided by L. The optimum cutoff values for PIV connected to progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) results were sought using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The OS and PFS differences between the PIV groups constituted the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. Results: ROC curve analysis indicated that the ideal PIV cutoff was 464 (AUC: 75.9%, sensitivity: 74.1%, specificity: 71.9%), which categorized patients into two groups based on PFS and OS results: low PIV (L-PIV; N = 69) and high PIV (H-PIV; N = 109). According to comparative survival analyses, patients in the L-PIV group had significantly longer median PFS (14.3 vs 7.3 months; HR: 3.04; P < 0.001) and OS (25.9 vs 13.3 months; HR: 2.86; P < 0.001) than those in the H-PIV group. Although none of the H-PIV patients could survive beyond 5 years, the estimated 5-year OS rate was 29.7% in the L-PIV cohort. In multivariate analyses, besides the L-PIV, N0 nodal stage, and CA 19-9 <= 90 U/mL appeared to be the independent predictors of better PFS (P < 0.05 for each) and OS (P < 0.05 for each) results. Conclusion: The present results indicated that pre-C-CRT L-PIV measures were associated with favorable median and long-term PFS and OS results in LA-PAC patients, suggesting that the PIV is a potent and independent novel prognostic biomarker.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Prognostic Significance of Novel Pancreas Cancer Prognostic Index in Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancers Treated with Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
    (2021) Topkan, Erkan; Selek, Ugur; Pehlivan, Berrin; Kucuk, Ahmet; Haksoyler, Veysel; Durankus, Nulifer Kilic; Sezen, Duygu; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; 0000-0001-8087-3140; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0002-4505-2280; 34511977; O-5474-2014; AAG-2213-2021
    Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic quality of the novel pancreas cancer prognostic index (PCPI), a combination of CA 19-9 and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), on the outcomes of locally advanced pancreas adenocarcinoma (LAPAC) patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT). Methods: This retrospective analysis covered 152 unresectable LAPAC patients treated from 2007 to 2019. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define ideal cutoff thresholds for the pretreatment CA 19-9 and SIRI measurements, indivi-dually. The associations between the PCPI groups and progression -free-(PFS) and overall survival (OS) comprised the respective primary and secondary endpoints. Results: The ROC curve analysis distinguished the respective rounded optimal cutoffs at 91 U/m/ L (< versus >= 90) and 1.8 (< versus >= 1.8) for CA 19-9 and SIRI, arranging the study cohort into two significantly different survival groups for each, with resultant four likely groups: Group-1: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L and SIRI<1.8, Group-2: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L but SIRI >= 1.8, Group-3: CA 19-9 >= 90 U/ m/L but SIRI<1.8, and Group-4: CA 19-9 >= 90 U/m/L and SIRI >= 1.8. Since the PFS (P=0.79) and OS (P=0.86) estimates of the groups 2 and 3 were statistically indistinct, we merged them as one group and created the novel three-tiered PCPI: PCPI-1: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L and SIRI<1.8, PCPI-2: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L but SIRI >= 1.8 or CA 19-9 >= 90 U/m/L but SIRI<1.8, and PCPI-3: CA 19-9 >= 90 U/m/L and SIRI >= 1.8, respectively. Comparative analyses unveiled that the PCPI-1 and PCPI-3 groups had the respective best and worst PFS (17.0 versus 7.5 versus 4.4 months; P<0.001) and OS (26.1 versus 15.1 versus 7.4 months; P<0.001) outcomes, while the PCPI-2 group posed in between. The multivariate analysis outcomes confirmed the novel three tired PCPI's independent prognostic significance on either of the PFS [HR: 5.38 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.96-5.80); P<0.001)] and OS [HR: 5.67 (95% CI: 5.19-6.15); P<0.001] endpoints, separately. Conclusion: The new PCPI introduced here can be used as an independent and reliable prog-nostic indicator to divide LAPAC patients into three subgroups with discrete survival results.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Low Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Poor Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Stage IIIB Non-small-cell Lung Carcinoma Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
    (2020) Ozdemir, Yurday; Topkan, Erkan; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Selek, Ugur; 0000-0002-1932-9784; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0002-2218-2074; 32214853; M-9530-2014; AAG-2213-2021; AAG-5629-2021
    Purpose: To investigate the prognostic utility of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in stage IIIB non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: A total of 358 stage IIIB NSCLC patients who received a total dose of 60-66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy and >= 1 cycle(s) of platinum-based chemotherapy were analyzed. The receiver operating curve analysis was utilized to identify the optimal PNI cut-off value demonstrating a significant connection with the overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: At a median follow-up time of 22.5 months (range: 2.4-123.5), 30.2% and 14% of the patients were still alive and free of disease progression, respectively.The median OS, LRPFS, and PFS were 25.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.3-46.6 months], 15.4 (95% CI: 26.6-35.3 months), and 10.7 (95% CI: 36.8-69.9 months), individually, for the whole study accomplice. The ROC analysis revealed an optimum rounded cut-off that associated meaningfully with each of the OS [area under the curve (AUC): 84.1%; sensitivity: 75.9%;72.4% specificity], LRPFS (AUC: 92.4%; sensitivity: 87.9%; 85.1% specificity), and PFS (AUC: 80.1%; sensitivity: 73.7%; 71.6% specificity) at a value of 40.5. Comparative analyses revealed that the patients presenting with PNI <= 40.5 had significantly inferior OS (16.8 vs 36.7; P<0.001), LRPFS (11.5 vs 19.5; P<0.001), and PFS (8.6 vs 13.6; P<0.001) outcomes compared to patients with PNI>40.5. In univariate analyses, lower T-stage (1-2 vs 3-4; P< 0.001), lower N-stage (N2 vs N3; P< 0.001), anemia status (absent vs present; P< 0.001), weight loss status (<5% vs >= 5%; P< 0.001), and PM group (<= 40.5 vs >40.5; P<0.001) were the factors found to be associated with OS, LRPFS and PFS results. The results of multivariate analysis exhibited that the PM was independently associated with each of the OS (P<0.001), LRPFS (P<0.001), and PFS (P<0.001) outcomes. Conclusion: The pretreatment PNI appears to be a robust novel prognostic factor that stratifies patients with stage IIIB NSCLC into two significantly distinct survival groups after CRT.