Başkent Üniversitesi Dergileri
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/13093
Browse
Item Cyclosporine Versus Tacrolimus Maintenance Therapy in Renal Transplant(Başkent Üniversitesi, 2011-06) Alghamdi, Saad; Albaqumi, Mamdouh; Alkorbi, Lutfi; Skolnik, Edward; Nabi, ZahidObjectives: Several studies have shown comparable results in long-term graft and patient survival, comparing a tacrolimus-based therapy to cyclosporine, while other studies have shown that a tacrolimus-based regimen had a better renal function with fewer episodes of acute rejection. Most of these studies were in a white population. We describe our experiences comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine maintenance therapy in a Saudi population. Materials and Methods: All patients from 2003 until 2008 in our transplant clinic were evaluated. A retrospective analysis was done comparing patient and graft survival, kidney function, and metabolic profile. Results: There was no statistical difference in acute rejection rate between the cyclosporine group and the tacrolimus group (18.7% vs 20.9%; P = .756). Mean serum creatinine was not statistically different between the 2 groups. Patient and graft survival at 1 and 2 years also were similar. Although patient and graft survival were similar, the cyclosporine group had a higher level of cholesterol compared with the tacrolimus group (4.6 ± 1.03 mmol/L vs 4.1 ± 0.80 mmol/L; P = .010). Conclusions: There is no difference in 1- or 2-year patient and graft survival between patients maintained on cyclosporine compared with tacrolimus. However, patients on cyclosporine had a higher blood pressure and serum cholesterol level.Item Lack of Association of the Polymorphism of the CCR5 Gene in Liver Recipients With Acute Rejection From China(Başkent Üniversitesi, 2011-08) Li, Hong; Zheng, Shu-Sen; Zhou, Lin; Xie, Hai-yangObjectives: This study sought to investigate the associations between polymorphisms in the chemokine receptor 5 gene and acute rejection in liver transplant. Materials and Methods: A total of 266 patients who underwent a liver transplant between January 2006 and March 2009 were enrolled in this study. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood, and chemokine receptor 5Δ32 was detected by polymerase chain reaction. Eight nucleotide polymorphism loci in the chemokine receptor 5 gene were detected by Applied Biosystems SNaP-Shot and TaqMan technologies. Results: Chemokine receptor 5Δ32 mutation was not detected in all the individuals from China. There was no significant association between the single nucleotide polymorphism in chemokine receptor 5 gene and acute rejection. Conclusions: Single nucleotide polymorphisms in a single gene of the chemokine receptor 5 might not play a role in acute rejection after liver transplant.Item The Role of Generics in Kidney Transplant: Mycophenolate Mofetil 500 Versus Mycophenolate: 2-Year Results(Başkent Üniversitesi, 2010-12) Abdallah, Taieb Ben; Kheder, Adel; Abderrahim, Ezzeddine; Bacha, Med Mongi; Mhibik, Sonia; Karoui, Cyrine; Helal, Imed; Cherif, Mejda; Ounissi, MondherObjectives: The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil has proven itself effective in preventing acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. However, this cost is ineffective with countries with a limited income. This study sought to compare the clinical and therapeutic profiles of a generic formulation with mycophenolate mofetil. Materials and Methods: This 2-year, single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study investigated the efficacy and safety of a new mycophenolate mofetil generic formulation compared with mycophenolate renal transplant recipients. The study divided patients in 2 groups: 8 patients in G1 received mycophenolate mofetil 500 and 10 patients in G2 received mycophenolate. Their demographics were similar: mean age, 36.6±7.1 and 33.3±11.7 years; sex M/F: 2/6 and 5/5; mean donor age, 42.6±11.1 and 43.6±13.9 years; mean HLA mismatches, 2.7±1.2 and 3.3±1.5; deceased donors, 25% and 20%; and warm ischemia time, 40.2±11.9 and 38.7±10.5 minutes. All patients received 2 g daily of mycophenolate mofetil 500 or mycophenolate with initial dosage of 0.1 mg/kg/d and prednisolone. Results: One patient of 7 in the mycophenolate mofetil group and 4 of 6 in the mycophenolate group had 1 episode of acute tubular necrosis, and 1 patient in each group had an acute rejection with no significant differences between the groups. The area under the curve of the mycophenolate mofetil did not show any difference between the 2 groups. The values of serum creatinine were also comparable. Patient survival rate at 6, 12, and 24 months was 100% in the groups. The frequencies of digestive and hematologic adverse effects were comparable in the groups with no significant differences. Conclusions: Use of mycophenolate mofetil 500 provided safe and effective immunosuppressive therapy compared with mycophenolate. However, as the duration of the study was short, these results need to be confirmed in a long-term study.