Wos Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10753

Browse

Filters

2019 - 20202

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Guler, Ozan Cemsearch.filters.applied.f.rights: search.filters.rights.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study
    (2020) Topkan, Erkan; Ozdemir, Yurday; Guler, Ozan Cem; Kucuk, Ahmet; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Sezen, Duygu; Akdemir, Eyub Yasar; Sezer, Ahmet; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Pehlivan, Berrin; Selek, Ugur; 0000-0002-1932-9784; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 0000-0002-2218-2074; 0000-0002-6445-1439; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0002-7862-0192; 32952557; M-9530-2014; AAC-5654-2020; AAG-5629-2021; AAD-2667-2020; AAG-2213-2021; AAD-6910-2021
    Background. We retrospectively compared the incidence of isolated elective nodal failure (IENF) and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field RT (IFRT) by employing the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology in stage IIIB/C inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT).Methods. Our PSM examination included 1048 stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients treated with C-CRT from January 2007 to December 2016: a total dose of 66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy and 1-3 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy concurrently. The primary and secondary endpoints were the IENF and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after ENI versus IFRT, respectively. Propensity scores were calculated for each group to adjust for confounding variables and facilitate well-balanced comparability by creating 1 : 1 matched study groups.Results. The median follow-up was 26.4 months for the whole study accomplice. The PSM analysis unveiled 1 : 1 matched 646 patients for the ENI (N = 323) and IFRT (N = 323) cohorts. Intergroup comparisons discovered that the 5-year isolated ENF incidence rates (3.4% versus 4.3%;P=0.52) and median overall survival (25.2 versus 24.6 months;P=0.69), locoregional progression-free survival (15.3 versus 15.1 months;P=0.52), and progression-free survival (11.7 versus 11.2 months;P=0.57) durations were similar between the ENI and IFRT cohorts, separately. However, acute grade 3-4 leukopenia (P=0.0012), grade 3 nausea-vomiting (P=0.006), esophagitis (P=0.003), pneumonitis (P=0.002), late grade 3-4 esophageal toxicity (P=0.038), and the need for hospitalization (P<0.001) were all significantly higher in the ENI than in the IFRT group, respectively.Conclusion. Results of the present large-scale PSM cohort established the absence of meaningful IENF or survival differences between the IFRT and ENI cohorts and, consequently, counseled the IFRT as the elected RT technique for such patients since ENI increased the toxicity rates.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus 'sandwich' adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma
    (2019) Onal, Cem; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Yavas, Guler; Gultekin, Melis; Guler, Ozan Cem; Akyurek, Serap; Yildiz, Ferah; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 30887753; D-5195-2014
    Objective: To analyze the outcomes of sequential or sandwich chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: Data from 4 centers were collected retrospectively for 179 patients with stage IIIC EC treated with postoperative RT and ChT (paclitaxel and carboplatin). Patients were either treated with 6 cycles of ChT followed by RT (sequential arm; 96 patients) or with 3 cycles of ChT, RT, and an additional 3 cycles of ChT (sandwich arm; 83 patients). Prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results: The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 64% and 59%, respectively, with a median followup of 41 months (range, 5-167 months). The 5-year OS rates were significantly higher in the sandwich than sequential arms (74% vs. 56%; p=0.03) and the difference for 5-year PFS rates was nearly significant (65% vs. 54%; p=0.05). In univariate analysis, treatment strategy, age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, pathology, rate of myometrial invasion, and grade were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, non-endometrioid histology, advanced FIGO stage, and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT were negative predictors for OS, whereas only non-endometrioid histology was a prognostic factor for PFS. Conclusion: Postoperative adjuvant ChT and RT for stage IIIC EC patients, either given sequentially or sandwiched, offers excellent clinical efficacy and acceptably low toxicity. Our data support the superiority of the sandwich regimen compared to the sequential strategy in stage IIIC EC patients for OS.