Wos Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10753
Browse
Item Liver and Kidney Transplant During a 6-Month Period in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Experience(2020) Akdur, Aydincan; Karakaya, Emre; Soy, Ebru H. Ayvazoglu; Karakayali, Feza Yarbug; Yildirim, Sedat; Torgay, Adnan; Sayin, Cihat Burak; Coskun, Mehmet; Moray, Gokhan; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-1874-947X; 0000-0002-6829-3300; 0000-0002-8726-3369; 0000-0002-0993-9917; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0002-5735-4315; 0000-0002-4879-7974; 0000-0003-2498-7287; 0000-0001-5630-022X; 33143601; AAB-3888-2021; AAJ-5221-2021; AAA-3068-2021; AAC-5566-2019; AAJ-8097-2021; AAF-4610-2019; AAD-5466-2021; AAE-1041-2021; AAM-4120-2021Objectives: With the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, many studies have indicated that elective surgeries should be postponed. However, post-ponement of transplants may cause diseases to get worse and increase the number in wait lists. We believe that, with precautions, transplant does not pose a risk during pandemic. Here, we aimed to evaluate our transplant results, which we safely performed during a 6-month pandemic period. Materials and Methods: Until September 2020, 3140 kidney and 667 liver transplants have been performed in our centers. We evaluated 38 kidney transplants and 9 liver transplants procedures performed during the pandemic (March 1 to September 2, 2020). Recipient and donor candidates were screened for COVID-19 with polymerase chain reaction and thoracic computed tomography. All recipients had routine immunosuppressive protocol. During hospitalization at our COVID-19-free transplant facility, we restricted the interactions during multidisciplinary rounds. Results: During the pandemic, 38 kidney transplants with an average length of hospital stay of 8.1 days were performed. Mean serum creatinine values of recipients were 0.91, 0.86, and 0.74 mg/dL on postoperative days 7, 30, and 90, respectively. During the pandemic, 9 living donor liver transplants (1 adult, 8 pediatric) were performed with an average length of hospital stay of 17.1 days. Mean serum total bilirubin levels were 0.9, 0.5, and 0.4 mg/dL on postoperative days 7, 30, and 90, respectively. Mean serum aspartate aminotransferase levels were 38.1, 28.3, and 22.3 U/L on postoperative days 7, 30, and 90, respectively. All recipients and donors were successfully discharged. Only 1 liver recipient died (on day 55 after discharge as a result of oxalosis-induced heart failure). Conclusions: According to our results, when precautions are taken, transplant does not pose a risk to patients during the pandemic period. We attribute the safety and success shown to our newly developed protocol in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Item Our Living Donor Protocol for Liver Transplant: A Single-Center Experience(2020) Karakaya, Emre; Akdur, Aydincan; Soy, Ebru H. Ayvazoglu; Harman, Ali; Coskun, Mehmet; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-0993-9917; 0000-0002-4879-7974; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0002-8726-3369; 0000-0001-5630-022X; 33187462; K-9824-2013; AAC-5566-2019; AAD-5466-2021; AAJ-8097-2021; AAA-3068-2021; AAM-4120-2021Objectives: The shortage of deceased donor organs is a limiting factor in transplant. The growing discrepancy between the wait list demand versus the supply of deceased donor organs has created an incentive for consideration of living donor liver transplant as an alternative. Here, we describe our evaluation process and donor complications. Materials and Methods: Since 1988, we have performed 659 (449 living donor and 210 deceased donor) liver transplants. The most important evaluation criteria is the relationship between donor and recipient, and we require that the donor must be related to the recipient. The evaluation protocol has 5 stages. Donor complications were defined as simple, moderate, and severe. Results: We retrospectively investigated data for 1387 candidates, and 938 (67.7%) were rejected; subsequently, 449 living donor liver transplants were performed. There were no complications in 398 of the donors (88.7%). Total complication rate was 11.3%. Simple complications were seen in 31 patients (6.9%). Moderate complications were seen in 19 patients (4.2%). We had only 1 severe complication, ie, organ failure from unspecified liver necrosis, which resulted in death. Conclusions: The relationship between donor and recipient and donor safety should be the primary focus for living donor liver transplant. Donor selection should be made carefully to minimize complications and provide adequately functional grafts.Item Use of Computed Tomography Volumetry to Assess Liver Weight in Patients With Cirrhosis During Evaluation Before Living-Donor Liver Transplant(2021) Haberal, Kemal Murat; Rahatli, Feride Kural; Turnaoglu, Hale; Ozgun, Gonca; Coskun, Mehmet; 0000-0002-8211-4065; 0000-0002-4226-4034; 0000-0002-0781-0036; 0000-0001-5630-022X; 30398100; R-9398-2019; AAL-9808-2021; AAK-8242-2021; AAM-4120-2021Objectives: Computed tomography liver volumetry has been widely used to detect total and segmental liver volume in living-donor liver transplantation. However, use of this technique to evaluate the cirrhotic liver remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of freehand computed tomography volumetry to assess total liver volume by comparing weights of total hepatectomy specimens in patients with cirrhosis. For our analyses, we considered the density of a cirrhotic liver to be 1.1 kg/L. Materials and Methods: Liver volume was measured using a freehand computed tomography technique in 52 patients with cirrhosis from different causes and who had no solid lesions before transplant. Measurements were made with a 16-slice multidetector computed tomography scanner (Siemens Somatom Sensation 16, Erlangen, Germany). For volumetric measurements, 10-mm-thick slices with 10-mm reconstruction intervals were preferred. Total hepatectomy weights of explant livers and computed tomography volumetry data were compared. Results: We excluded 3 cirrhotic patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome due to wide variations in scatterplot results. In the 49 patients included in the final analyses, average estimated liver volume by computed tomography was 721 +/- 398 mL and actual cirrhotic liver weight was 727.8 +/- 415 g. No significant differences were shown between these measurements. A simple regression analysis used to analyze correlations between estimated liver volume by computed tomography and real cirrhotic liver weight showed correlation of 0.957 (P < .001). When computed tomography liver volumetry as the independent variable and cirrhotic liver weight as dependent variable were considered, regression analyses showed R-2 = 0.915. Conclusions: Freehand computed tomography liver volumetry can be confidently used to evaluate liver volume in cirrhotic liver patients similar to use of this technique to estimate actual weights in normal livers. This technique can also be valuable during pretransplant and liver resection evaluations to ensure a more successful outcome.