Scopus Açık Erişimli Yayınlar

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10760

Browse

Filters

2021 - 20222

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Durankus, Nulifer Kilic

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Postchemoradiotherapy Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Distant Metastasis and Survival Results in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancers
    (2022) Topkan, Erkan; Selek, Ugur; Haksoyler, Veysel; Kucuk, Ahmet; Durankus, Nulifer Kilic; Sezen, Duygu; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Pehlivan, Berrin; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-7123; 35685603; AAG-2213-2021
    Background and Objectives. In the absence of similar research, we endeavored to investigate the prognostic usefulness of posttreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPAC). Materials and Methods. Our retrospective research included a sum of 126 LAPAC patients who received CCRT. The NLR was calculated for each patient based on the complete blood count test results obtained on the last day of the CCRT. The availability of optimal cutoff(s) that might dichotomize the whole cohort into two groups with significantly different clinical outcomes was searched using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Primary and secondary endpoints were the potential association between the post-CCRT NLR measures and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. Results. The median follow-up duration was 14.7 months (range: 2.4-94.5). The median and 3-year OS and DMFS rates for the whole group were 15.3 months (95% confidence interval: 12.4-18.2) and 14.5%, and 8.7 months (95% CI: 6.7-10.7) and 6.3% separately. The ROC curve analysis findings separated the patients into two groups on a rounded NLR cutoff of 3.1 (area under the curve (AUC): 75.4%; sensitivity: 74.2%; specificity: 73.9%) for OS and DMFS: NLR < 3.1 (N = 62) and NLR >= 3.1 (N = 64), respectively. Comparisons between the NLR groups displayed that the median OS (11.4 vs. 21.4 months; P < 0.001) and DMFS (6.0 vs. 16.0 months; P < 0.001) lengths were significantly shorter in the NLR >= 3.1 group than its NLR < 3.1 counterparts, as well as the 3-year actuarial DM rate (79.7% vs. 50.0%; P=0.003). The N1-2 nodal stage, CA 19-9 > 90 U/mL, and NLR > 3.1 were found to be independent predictors of poor prognosis in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion. The present study found that the posttreatment NLR >= 3.1 was independently linked with a higher risk of DM and subsequent degraded survival outcomes in unresectable LAPAC patients managed with exclusive CCRT.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Prognostic Significance of Novel Pancreas Cancer Prognostic Index in Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancers Treated with Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
    (2021) Topkan, Erkan; Selek, Ugur; Pehlivan, Berrin; Kucuk, Ahmet; Haksoyler, Veysel; Durankus, Nulifer Kilic; Sezen, Duygu; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; 0000-0001-8087-3140; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0002-4505-2280; 34511977; O-5474-2014; AAG-2213-2021
    Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic quality of the novel pancreas cancer prognostic index (PCPI), a combination of CA 19-9 and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), on the outcomes of locally advanced pancreas adenocarcinoma (LAPAC) patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT). Methods: This retrospective analysis covered 152 unresectable LAPAC patients treated from 2007 to 2019. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define ideal cutoff thresholds for the pretreatment CA 19-9 and SIRI measurements, indivi-dually. The associations between the PCPI groups and progression -free-(PFS) and overall survival (OS) comprised the respective primary and secondary endpoints. Results: The ROC curve analysis distinguished the respective rounded optimal cutoffs at 91 U/m/ L (< versus >= 90) and 1.8 (< versus >= 1.8) for CA 19-9 and SIRI, arranging the study cohort into two significantly different survival groups for each, with resultant four likely groups: Group-1: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L and SIRI<1.8, Group-2: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L but SIRI >= 1.8, Group-3: CA 19-9 >= 90 U/ m/L but SIRI<1.8, and Group-4: CA 19-9 >= 90 U/m/L and SIRI >= 1.8. Since the PFS (P=0.79) and OS (P=0.86) estimates of the groups 2 and 3 were statistically indistinct, we merged them as one group and created the novel three-tiered PCPI: PCPI-1: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L and SIRI<1.8, PCPI-2: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L but SIRI >= 1.8 or CA 19-9 >= 90 U/m/L but SIRI<1.8, and PCPI-3: CA 19-9 >= 90 U/m/L and SIRI >= 1.8, respectively. Comparative analyses unveiled that the PCPI-1 and PCPI-3 groups had the respective best and worst PFS (17.0 versus 7.5 versus 4.4 months; P<0.001) and OS (26.1 versus 15.1 versus 7.4 months; P<0.001) outcomes, while the PCPI-2 group posed in between. The multivariate analysis outcomes confirmed the novel three tired PCPI's independent prognostic significance on either of the PFS [HR: 5.38 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.96-5.80); P<0.001)] and OS [HR: 5.67 (95% CI: 5.19-6.15); P<0.001] endpoints, separately. Conclusion: The new PCPI introduced here can be used as an independent and reliable prog-nostic indicator to divide LAPAC patients into three subgroups with discrete survival results.