PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4810
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Effects of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy on Peripheral Vascular Function(2022) Kaya, Ersin; Kocabas, Umut; Simsek, Evrim; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Kahraman, Umit; Engin, Cagatay; Yagdi, Tahir; Ozbaran, Mustafa; Akilli, Azem; 35089263; GXG-7709-2022The peripheral vascular effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation are still unclear. The aim of the current study was to determine peripheral vascular function before and after implantation of CF-LVAD in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), and to compare this data to age- and sex-matched chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. Forty-three consecutive end-stage HF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III/IV; three women and 40 men; mean age 53 +/- 11 years) who planned to receive CF-LVAD implantation comprised the LVAD patient population, and their clinical characteristics, preoperative and third postoperative month peripheral vascular function assessment data including flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and pulsatility index (PI) assessed by ultrasound Doppler in brachial artery were compared to age- and sex-matched chronic, stable HFrEF patients (NYHA class II; five women and 30 men; mean age 51 +/- 10 years). After CF-LVAD implantation, median FMD decreased from 5.4 to 3.7% (p < 0.001), and median PI decreased from 6.9 to 1.4 (p < 0.001). In patients with end-stage HF before CF-LVAD implantation, FMD and PI were significantly lower compared to the chronic HFrEF patients (FMD: 5.4% +/- 0.9% vs. 7.6% +/- 1.1%; p < 0.001, respectively) and (PI: 6.9 +/- 1.3 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.2; p = 0.023, respectively). The current study revealed impaired peripheral vascular function in the end-stage HF patients compared to stable HFrEF patients, and documented the deterioration of peripheral vascular function after CF-LVAD implantation. These results suggest that impaired peripheral vascular function in the CF-LVAD patients compared to preoperative assessment is a consequence of the nonpulsatile blood flow due to the continuous-flow mechanical support.Item Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure therapy(2020) Cavusoglu, Yuksel; Altay, Hakan; Cahn, Avivit; Celik, Ahmet; Demir, Serafettin; Kilicaslan, Baris; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Raz, Itamar; Temizhan, Ahmet; Yildirimturk, Ozlem; Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan; AAE-1392-2021; 32281958Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are a new class of drugs for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) which inhibit urinary glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule of the nephron and result in glucosuria, natriuresis and diuresis. In large, randomized clinical trials, SGLT-2i have been shown to reduce major cardiovascular (CV) events and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with T2DM who have atherosclerotic CV disease or CV risk factors. In these trials, SGLT-2i is have their greatest and most consistent effect on reducing the risk of HF hospitalization. The reduction in HF hospitalization was also observed in subgroups of patients with a HF diagnosis at baseline, which raised the possibility of a clinical benefit of SGLT-2i in HF patients, regardless of the presence or absence of T2DM. In very recently published DAPA-HF trial, a SGLT-2i, dapagliflozin treatment on top of standard HF therapy has been shown to have clear clinical benefits in terms of reducing HF hospitalization, CV mortality, all-cause mortality and improving quality of life in HF patients. This compelling evidence suggests that SGLT-2i have a potential to be an effective treatment option in HF, regardless of diabetes. This article provides a comprehensive overview focused on the role of SGLT-2i in the treatment of HF.Item Natriuretic Peptides in Clinical Practice(2019) Cavusoglu, Yüksel; Alper, Ahmet Taha; Altay, Hakan; Celik, Ahmet; Demirkan, Burcu; Guvenc, Tolga Sinan; Kucukoglu, Mehmet Serdar; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Ozdemir, Murat; Ozin, Bulent; Sayin, Tamer; Yildirimturk, Ozlem; Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan; Zorkun, Cafer; 30860204; AAE-1392-2021; AAD-9938-2021Natriuretic peptides have long been introduced into clinical practice. These biomarkers have certainly been shown to provide useful information in the diagnosis, prognosis and risk stratification in heart failure and also may have a role in the guidance of heart failure therapy. Although, there are some limitations in using of these markers such as lack of specificity, aging, renal dysfunction or obesity, among the huge number of candidates for heart failure biomarkers, only natriuretic peptides are currently widely used in daily clinical practice in heart failure. Recent heart failure guidelines recognize natriuretic peptides as an essential tool in the new diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. Furthermore, natriuretic peptides are not only used in the diagnosis or prognosis of heart failure, but also these biomarkers are referred to have some potential role in primary prevention, cardio-oncology, advanced heart failure, assessment of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy, pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute coronary syndromes, atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease. In this article, natriuretic peptides have been reviewed for their updated information and new recommendations in heart failure and also potential role of these biomarkers in the management of various clinical conditions have been addressed in the form of expert opinion based on the available data in the literature.Item Practical approaches for the treatment of chronic heart failure: Frequently asked questions, overlooked points and controversial issues in current clinical practice(2015) Cavusoglu, Yuksel; Altay, Hakan; Ekmekci, Ahmet; Eren, Mehmet; Kucukoglu, Mehmet Serdar; Nalbantgil, Sanem; San, Ibrahim; Selcuk, Timur; Temizhan, Ahmet; Ural, Dilek; 26574641Heart failure (HF) is a progressive disorder associated with impaired quality of life, high morbidity, mortality and frequent hospitalization and affects millions of people from all around the world. Despite further improvements in HF therapy, mortality and morbidity remains to be very high. The life-long treatment, frequent hospitalization, and sophisticated and very expensive device therapies for HF also leads a substantial economic burden on the health care system. Therefore, implementation of evidence-based guideline-recommended therapy is very important to overcome its worse clinical outcomes. However, HF therapy is a long process that has many drawbacks and sometimes HF guidelines cannot answers to every question which rises in everyday clinical practice. In this paper, commonly encountered questions, overlooked points, controversial issues, management strategies in grey zone and problems arising during follow up of a HF patient in real life clinical practice have been addressed in the form of expert opinions based on the available data in the literature.