PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4810

Browse

Filters

2020 - 20222

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Kocabas, UmutSubject: search.filters.subject.heart failure

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Effects of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy on Peripheral Vascular Function
    (2022) Kaya, Ersin; Kocabas, Umut; Simsek, Evrim; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Kahraman, Umit; Engin, Cagatay; Yagdi, Tahir; Ozbaran, Mustafa; Akilli, Azem; 35089263; GXG-7709-2022
    The peripheral vascular effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation are still unclear. The aim of the current study was to determine peripheral vascular function before and after implantation of CF-LVAD in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), and to compare this data to age- and sex-matched chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. Forty-three consecutive end-stage HF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III/IV; three women and 40 men; mean age 53 +/- 11 years) who planned to receive CF-LVAD implantation comprised the LVAD patient population, and their clinical characteristics, preoperative and third postoperative month peripheral vascular function assessment data including flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and pulsatility index (PI) assessed by ultrasound Doppler in brachial artery were compared to age- and sex-matched chronic, stable HFrEF patients (NYHA class II; five women and 30 men; mean age 51 +/- 10 years). After CF-LVAD implantation, median FMD decreased from 5.4 to 3.7% (p < 0.001), and median PI decreased from 6.9 to 1.4 (p < 0.001). In patients with end-stage HF before CF-LVAD implantation, FMD and PI were significantly lower compared to the chronic HFrEF patients (FMD: 5.4% +/- 0.9% vs. 7.6% +/- 1.1%; p < 0.001, respectively) and (PI: 6.9 +/- 1.3 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.2; p = 0.023, respectively). The current study revealed impaired peripheral vascular function in the end-stage HF patients compared to stable HFrEF patients, and documented the deterioration of peripheral vascular function after CF-LVAD implantation. These results suggest that impaired peripheral vascular function in the CF-LVAD patients compared to preoperative assessment is a consequence of the nonpulsatile blood flow due to the continuous-flow mechanical support.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of acute decompensated heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation
    (2020) Kocabas, Umut; Sinan, Umit Yasar; Arugaslan, Emre; Kursun, Mustafa; Coner, Ali; Celebi, Ozlem Ozcan; Ozturk, Cengiz; Dalgic, Onur; Turkoglu, Ebru Ipek; Kemal, Hatice Soner; Gazi, Emine; Altin, Cihan; Zoghi, Mehdi; 32352420
    Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common cardiovascular diseases. The impact of AF on in-hospital outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is controversial. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of AF among hospitalized patients with ADHF and describe the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of these patients with and without AF. Methods: We examined the multicenter, observational data from the real-life data of hospitalized patients with HF: Journey HF-TR study in Turkey that studied the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of hospitalized patients with ADHF between September 2015 and September 2016. Results: Of the 1,606 patients hospitalized with ADHF, 626 (39%) had a history of AF or developed new-onset AF during hospitalization. The patients with AF were older (71 +/- 12 vs. 65 +/- 13 years; p<0.001) and more likely to have a history of hypertension, valvular heart disease, and stroke. The AF patients were less likely to have coronary artery disease and diabetes. In-hospital adverse event rates and length of in-hospital stay were similar in ADHF patients, both with and without AF. In-hospital all-cause mortality rate was higher in patients with AF than in patients without AF, although the difference was not statistically significant (8.9% vs. 6.8%; p=0.121). Conclusion: AF has been found in more than one-third of the patients hospitalized with ADHF, and it has varied clinical features and comorbidities. The presence of AF is not associated with increased adverse events or all-cause mortality during the hospitalization time.