PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4810
Browse
15 results
Search Results
Item Cost-of-disease of Heart Failure in Turkey: A Delphi Panel-based Analysis of Direct and Indirect Costs(2022) Cavusoglu, Yuksel; Altay, Hakan; Aras, Dursun; Celik, Ahmet; Ertas, Fatih Sinan; Kilicaslan, Baris; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Temizhan, Ahmet; Ural, Dilek; Yildirimturk, Ozlem; Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan; 35872647Background: Heart failure (HF) is considered a significant public health issue with a substantial and growing epidemiologic and economic burden in relation to longer life expectancy and aging global population Aims: To determine cost-of-disease of heart failure (HF) in Turkey from the payer perspective. Study Design: Cross-sectional cost of disease study. Methods: In this cost-of-disease study, annual direct and indirect costs of management of HF were determined based on epidemiological, clinical and lost productivity inputs provided by a Delphi panel consisted of 11 experts in HF with respect to ejection fraction (EF) status (HF patients with reduced EF (HFrEF), mid-range EF (HFmrEF) and preserved EF (HFpEF)) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. Direct medical costs included cost items on outpatient management, inpatient management, medications, and non -pharmaceutical treatments. Indirect cost was calculated based on the lost productivity due to absenteeism and presenteeism. Results: 51.4%, 19.5%, and 29.1% of the patients were estimated to be HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF patients, respectively. The total annual direct medical cost per patient was $887 and non-pharmaceutical treatments ($373, 42.1%) were the major direct cost driver. Since an estimated nationwide number of HF patients is 1,128,000 in 2021, the total annual national economic burden of HF is estimated to be $1 billion in 2021. The direct medical cost was higher in patients with HFrEF than in those with HFmrEF or HFpEF ($1,147 vs. $555 and $649, respectively). Average indirect cost per patient was calculated to be $3,386 and was similar across HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF groups, but increased with advanced NYHA stage. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the substantial economic burden of HF in terms of both direct and indirect costs and indicate that the non-pharmaceutical cost is the major direct medical cost driver in HF management, regardless of the EF status of HF patients.Item Pre-Discharge and Post-Discharge Management and Treatment Optimization in Acute Heart Failure(2022) Cavusoglu, Yuksel; Altay, Hakan; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Temizhan, Ahmet; Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan; 35860891Acute heart failure is associated with high mortality and rehospitalization rates and required urgent evaluation and early initiation or intensification of therapy. The risk of death and heart failure rehospitalization is greatest in the early post-discharge period, particularly within the first 3-6 months, and declines over time, which is referred as a vulnerable period of acute heart failure hospitalization. Therefore, implementation of guidelines-directed optimal therapy is not only so crucial in the acute phase but also very important in the pre-discharge and early post-discharge period in reducing mortality and rehospitalization rates. The pre-discharge period represents a window of opportunity for treatment optimization which includes to eliminate congestion, to treat comorbidities or precipitating factors, and to initiate or uptitrate oral therapy before discharge. Early assessment in the post-discharge period based on clinical evaluation and laboratory exams, further optimization of disease-modifying therapy is associated with lower 30-day hospitalization for heart failure. In clinical practice, clinicians usually focus on acute phase intravenous medications and short-term device therapies and, in fact, neglect short- and long-term comprehensive approaches. This paper reviews management strategies that may help reduce mortality and heart failure rehospitalizations in pre-discharge and post-discharge periods and include adopting holistic approaches for heart failure, increasing optimization of evidence-based therapies, treating cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities, improving care transitions, monitoring, and disease management.Item Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: Real-world experience from Turkey (ARNi-TR)(2021) Ekici, Berkay; Yaman, Mehmet; Kucuk, Murathan; Dereli, Seckin; Yenercag, Mustafa; Yigit, Zerrin; Bas, Mehmet Memduh; Karavelioglu, Yusuf; Cakmak, Huseyin Altug; Kivrak, Tarik; Ozkan, Hakan; Altin, Cihan; Sabanoglu, Cengiz; Demirkan, Burcu; Atas, Ali Ekber; Kilicaslan, Fethi; Altay, Hakan; Tengiz, Istemihan; Erkan, Aycan Fahri; Kilicaslan, Baris; Olgun, Fatih Erkam; Durakoglugil, Murtaza Emre; Alhan, Aslihan; Zoghi, Mehdi; 34308869Objective: Heart failure (HF) is a growing public health problem with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) has emerged as a promising treatment for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Here, we shared our experience with the use of ARNi in HFrEF from multiple centers in Turkey. Methods: The ARNi-TR is a multicenter, nonintervention al, retrospective, observational study. Overall, 779 patients with HF from 22 centers in Turkey who were prescribed sacubitril/valsartan were examined. Initial clinical status, biochemical and echocardiographic parameters, and New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA-FC) values were compared with follow-up values after 1 year of ARNi use. In addition, the effect of ARNi on number of annual hospitalizations was investigated, and the patients were divided into 2 groups, depending on whether ARNi was initiated at hospitalization or under outpatient clinic control. Results: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), left-ventricle ejection fraction (LV-EF), and NYHA-FC values improved significantly in both groups (all parameters, p<0.001) within 1-year follow-up. In both groups, a decrease in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values was observed in ARNi use (p<0.001), and a decrease in daily diuretic doses and hospitalizations owing to HF were observed after ARNi use (all comparisons, p<0.001). Hypotension (16.9%) was the most common side effect in patients using ARNi. Conclusion: The ARNi-TR study offers comprehensive real-life data for patients using ARNi in Turkey. The use of ARNi has shown significant improvements in FC, NT-proBNP, HbA1c levels, and LV-EF. Likewise, reductions in the number of annual hospitalizations and daily furosemide doses for HF were seen in this study.Item Snapshot evaluation of acute and chronic heart failure in real-life in Turkey: A follow-up data for mortality(2020) Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan; Aksakal, Emrah; Aksu, Ugur; Altay, Hakan; Nesligul, Yildirim; Celik, Ahmet; Akil, Mehmet Ata; Bekar, Lutfu; Vural, Mustafa Gokhan; Guvenc, Rengin Cetin; Ozer, Savas; Ural, Dilek; Cavusoglu, Yuksel; Tokgozoglu, Lale; 32120368; AAE-1392-2021Objective: Heart failure (HF) is a progressive clinical syndrome. SELFIE-TR is a registry illustrating the overall HF patient profile of Turkey. Herein, all-cause mortality (ACM) data during follow-up were provided. Methods: This is a prospective outcome analysis of SELFIE-TR. Patients were classified as acute HF (AHF) versus chronic HF (CHF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction and were followed up for ACM. Results: There were 1054 patients with a mean age of 63.3 +/- 13.3 years and with a median follow-up period of 16 (7-17) months. Survival data within 1 year were available in 1022 patients. Crude ACM was 19.9% for 1 year in the whole group. ACM within 1 year was 13.7% versus 32.6% in patients with CHF and AHF, respectively (p<0.001). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, beta blocker, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist were present in 70.6%, 88.2%, and 50.7%, respectively. In the whole cohort, survival curves were graded according to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) scores <= 1 versus 2 versus 3 as 28% versus 20.2% versus 12.2%, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis of the whole cohort yielded age (p=0.009) and AHF (p=0.028) as independent predictors of mortality in 1 year. Conclusion: One-year mortality is high in Turkish patients with HF compared with contemporary cohorts with AHF and CHF. Of note, GDMT score is influential on 1-year mortality being the most striking one on chronic HFrEF. On the other hand, in the whole cohort, age and AHF were the only independent predictors of death in 1 year.Item Turk Cardiology Association Completion Report: COVID-19 Pandemic and Things to Know About Cardiovascular Diseases (25 March 2020)(2020) Altay, Hakan; Okyay, Kaan; 0000-0001-6134-8826; 32250347; AAK-7355-2020; AAE-1392-2021Item Adherence to guideline-directed medical and device Therapy in outpAtients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The ATA study(2020) Kocabas, Umut; Sariturk, Cagla; Altay, Hakan; Pehlivanoglu, Seckin; 32628147; AAE-1392-2021Objective: Despite recommendations from heart failure guidelines on the use of pharmacologic and device therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), important inconsistencies in guideline adherence persist in practice. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to guideline-directed medical and device therapy for the treatment of patients with chronic HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction <= 40%). Methods: The Adherence to guideline-directed medical and device Therapy in outpAtients with HFrEF (ATA) study is a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in 24 centers from January 2019 to June 2019. Results: The study included 1462 outpatients (male: 70.1%, mean age: 67 +/- 11 years, mean LVEF: 30%+/- 6%) with chronic HFrEF. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and ivabradin were used in 78.2%, 90.2%, 55.4%, and 12.1% of patients, respectively. The proportion of patients receiving target doses of medical treatments was 24.6% for RAS inhibitors, 9.9% for beta-blockers, and 10.5% for MRAs. Among patients who met the criteria for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), only 16.9% of patients received an ICD (167 of 983) and 34% (95 of 279) of patients underwent CRT (95 of 279). Conclusion: The ATA study shows that most HFrEF outpatients receive RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers but not MRAs or ivabradin when the medical reasons for nonuse, such as drug intolerance or contraindications, are taken into account. In addition, most eligible patients with HFrEF do not receive target doses of pharmacological treatments or guideline-recommended device therapy.Item Successful management of acute pulmonary embolism complicated with cardiopulmonary shock by implementing point-of-care ultrasonography and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(2020) Kocabas, Umut; Altay, Hakan; Eren, Gulay; Bakuy, Vedat; Kucukaksu, Deniz Suha; 32175167; AAI-5861-2021; AAE-1392-2021Item Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated with Carfilzomib Treatment(2020) Kocabas, Umut; Atalay, Figen; Altay, Hakan; Altun, Armagan; Pehlivanoglu, Seckin; 0000-0003-4384-2913; 0000-0002-8506-7583; 0000-0002-3233-8263; 32647445; AAE-1392-2021; B-5507-2014; ABB-5844-2020Item Turkish Society of Cardiology consensus paper on management of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy(2019) Ulus, Taner; Okyay, Kaan; Kabul, Hasan Kutsi; Ozcan, Emin Evren; Ozeke, Ozcan; Altay, Hakan; 30833535; AAK-7355-2020; AAE-1392-2021Item Natriuretic Peptides in Clinical Practice(2019) Cavusoglu, Yüksel; Alper, Ahmet Taha; Altay, Hakan; Celik, Ahmet; Demirkan, Burcu; Guvenc, Tolga Sinan; Kucukoglu, Mehmet Serdar; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Ozdemir, Murat; Ozin, Bulent; Sayin, Tamer; Yildirimturk, Ozlem; Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan; Zorkun, Cafer; 30860204; AAE-1392-2021; AAD-9938-2021Natriuretic peptides have long been introduced into clinical practice. These biomarkers have certainly been shown to provide useful information in the diagnosis, prognosis and risk stratification in heart failure and also may have a role in the guidance of heart failure therapy. Although, there are some limitations in using of these markers such as lack of specificity, aging, renal dysfunction or obesity, among the huge number of candidates for heart failure biomarkers, only natriuretic peptides are currently widely used in daily clinical practice in heart failure. Recent heart failure guidelines recognize natriuretic peptides as an essential tool in the new diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. Furthermore, natriuretic peptides are not only used in the diagnosis or prognosis of heart failure, but also these biomarkers are referred to have some potential role in primary prevention, cardio-oncology, advanced heart failure, assessment of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy, pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute coronary syndromes, atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease. In this article, natriuretic peptides have been reviewed for their updated information and new recommendations in heart failure and also potential role of these biomarkers in the management of various clinical conditions have been addressed in the form of expert opinion based on the available data in the literature.