PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4810
Browse
5 results
Search Results
Item The efficacy of ultrasound-guided type-I and type-II pectoral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia after breast augmentation: A prospective, randomised study(2019) Karaca, Omer; Pinar, Huseyin U.; Arpaci, Enver; Dogan, Rafi; Cok, Oya Y.; Ahiskalioglu, Ali; 0000-0002-8467-8171; 0000-0003-0473-6763; 0000-0003-1933-2075; 29627431; B-7473-2016; Q-2420-2015; AAU-6923-2020Purpose: The present study was planned to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided Pecs I and II blocks for postoperative analgesia after sub-pectoral breast augmentation. Methods: Fifty-four adult female patients undergoing breast augmentation were randomly divided into two groups: the control group (Group C, n = 27) who were not subjected to block treatment and Pecs group (Group P, n = 27) who received Pecs I (bupivacain 0.25%, 10 mL) and Pecs II (bupivacain 0.25%, 20 mL) block. Patient-controlled fentanyl analgesia was used for postoperative pain relief in both groups, and the patients were observed for the presence of any block-related complications. Results: The 24-h fentanyl consumption was smaller in Group P [mean +/- SD, 378.7 +/- 54.0 mu g and 115.7 +/- 98.1 mu g, respectively; P < 0.001]. VAS scores in Group P were significantly lower at the time of admission to the post-anaesthetic care unit and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h (P < 0.001). The rates of nausea and vomiting were higher in Group C than in Group P (9 vs 2, P = 0.018). Hospital stay duration was shorter in Group P than in Group C (24.4 +/- 1.2 h vs 27.0 +/- 3.1 h, P < 0.001). No block-related complications were recorded. Conclusions: Combine used of Pecs I and II blocks provide superior postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing breast augmentation and shortens hospital stay. (C) 2018 Societe francaise d'anesthesie et de reanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.Item Effects of Single-Dose Preemptive Pregabalin and Intravenous Ibuprofen on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Acute Pain after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy(2019) Karaca, Omer; Pinar, Huseyin U.; Turk, Emin; Dogan, Rafi; Ahiskalioglu, Ali; Solak, Sezen K.; 0000-0003-1933-2075; 0000-0002-8467-8171; 0000-0003-0473-6763; 29157034; AAU-6923-2020; B-7473-2016; Q-2420-2015Purpose: Non-opioid medications as a part of multimodal analgesia has been increasingly suggested in the management of acute post-surgical pain. The present study was planned to compare the efficacy of the combination of pregabalin plus iv ibuprofen. Methods: 58 patients were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. The pregabalin group (Group P, n = 29) received 150 mg pregabalin, the pregabalin plus ibuprofen group (Gropu PI, n = 29) received 150 mg pregabalin and 400mg iv ibuprofen before surgery. Postoperative fentanyl consumption, additional analgesia requirements and PACU stay were recorded. Postoperative analgesia was performed with patient-controlled IV fentanyl. Results: VAS scores in the group PI were statistically lower at PACU, 1and 2 hours at rest, at PACU, 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours on movement compared to the group P (P < 0.05). Opioid consumption was statistically significantly higher in the group P compared to the group PI (130.17 +/- 60.27 vs 78.45 +/- 60.40 mu q, respectively, P < 0.001) and reduced in the 4th 24 hours by 55% in group PI. Rescue analgesia usage was statistically significantly higher in the group P than in the group PI (16/29 vs 7/29, respectively, P < 0.001). Four patient in the group PI did not need any opioid drug. Besides, PACU stay was shorter in the group PI than the group P (10.62 +/- 2.38 vs 15.59 +/- 2.11 min, respectively, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Preemptive pregabalin plus iv ibuprofen in laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduced postoperative opioid consumption. This multimodal analgesic aproach generated lower pain scores in the postoperative period.Item Continuous ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block for the management of chronic pain(2019) Ahiskalioglu, Ali; Alici, Haci Ahmet; Ciftci, Bahadir; Celik, Mine; Karaca, Omer; 0000-0003-1933-2075; 29253539; AAU-6923-2020Item Less painful ESWL with ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block: a prospective randomized controlled study(2019) Yayik, Ahmet Murat; Ahiskalioglu, Ali; Alici, Haci Ahmet; Celik, Erkan Cem; Cesur, Sevim; Ahiskalioglu, Elif Oral; Demirdogen, Saban Oguz; Karaca, Omer; Adanur, Senol; 0000-0003-1933-2075; 31496381; AAU-6923-2020Objectives: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been widely used for the treatment of urinary tract stones and is usually administered as an outpatient procedure, although the vast majority of patients do not tolerate it without sedoanalgesia. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a newly-defined technique for abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided QLB in ESWL. Materials and methods: Forty patients, aged 18-65, with ASA physical status I-II and scheduled for ESWL were randomly assigned to Group C (control group) and Group QLB (treatment group). Group QLB received single-shot USG-guided transmuscular QLB with 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 ml of 2% lidocaine before a 20-min ESWL procedure. No intervention was performed on Group C. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, ESWL and stone details were recorded. Results: VAS scores were significantly lower in Group QLB at all time intervals (p < 0.05). Fentanyl consumption during ESWL was significantly lower in Group QLB than in Group C (p < 0.001). The fragmentation success rate was significantly higher in Group QLB than in Group C (19/20 vs 14/20, respectively, p = 0.046). Patient satisfaction was also higher in Group QLB (p = 0.011). Conclusions: This study shows that QLB provided adequate analgesia for ESWL and that it reduced extra opioid consumption significantly compared to the control group.Item A Forgotten but Important Drug on Preanaesthetic Evaluation: Amiodarone(2016) Ahiskalioglu, Ali; Ahiskalioglu, Elif Oral; Karaca, Omer; Ince, Ilker; 0000-0003-1933-2075; 27366582; AAU-6923-2020