PubMed Kapalı Erişimli Yayınlar

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10764

Browse

Filters

2020 - 20212

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Dogan Durdag, Gulsen

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Accuracy of intra-operative frozen section in guiding surgical staging of endometrial cancer
    (2021) Dogan Durdag, Gulsen; Alemdaroglu, Songul; Aka Bolat, Filiz; Yilmaz Baran, Safak; Yuksel Simsek, Seda; Celik, Husnu; 0000-0002-5064-5267; 0000-0003-4335-6659; 0000-0001-5874-7324; 0000-0003-3191-9776; 0000-0003-1185-9227; 33608802; AAI-9594-2021; AAI-8400-2021; AAK-7016-2021
    Purpose Surgery consists the main treatment of endometrial cancer; however, decision of lypmhadenectomy is controversial. Intra-operative frozen section (FS) is commonly used in guiding surgical staging; nevertheless, there are different reports regarding its adequacy and reliability. Aim of this study is to assess accuracy of FS in predicting paraffin section (PS) results in patients with endometrium cancer. Methods Data of 223 cases, who were operated for endometrial cancer at a tertiary hospital in 2012-2019, were analyzed retrospectively. Histological type, grade, tumor diameter, depth of myometrial invasion, and cervical and adnexal involvement in frozen and paraffin section were evaluated. Positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of frozen results in predicting paraffin results for each parameter was assessed. Statistical significance was taken as 0.05 in all tests. Results Accuracy of FS in predicting PS results were 76.23% for histology, 75.45% for grade, 85.31% for depth of myometrial invasion, and 95.45% for tumor diameter. Surgery, based on FS results, caused undertreatment in 4 patients, while metastatic lymph node ratios were found in only 35.3-50.0% of cases who had high risk parameters at FS. Conclusion Our FS results have reasonable accuracy rates in predicting PS results, in comparison with the previous literature. However, even if the high risk parameters detected in FS predict PS accurately, absence of lymph node involvement in all cases with high risk parameters indicates that FS-based triage cannot prevent unnecessary lymphadenectomies.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Single- or double-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean: A randomized trial
    (2020) Yilmaz Baran, Safak; Kalayci, Hakan; Dogan Durdag, Gulsen; Yetkinel, Selcuk; Alemdaroglu, Songul; Cok, Tayfun; Bulgan Kilicdag, Esra; 0000-0002-5064-5267; 0000-0002-2165-9168; 0000-0003-4335-6659; 0000-0002-0942-9108; 0000-0002-7854-2921; 0000-0001-5874-7324; 33029804; AAI-9594-2021; AAL-1530-2021; AAI-8400-2021; AAK-8872-2021; A-8208-2008; ABF-6439-2020
    Introduction Cesarean deliveries are commonly performed throughout the world. Although the uterine closure technique following this procedure may influence how the uterine scar heals, there is insufficient evidence for choosing the appropriate technique and so preventing long-term negative consequences. This prospective, randomized study examined the effects of single- and double-layer uterine closure techniques on uterine scar healing following cesarean delivery. Material and methods This study assessed a total of 282 women aged 18-45 years who were in gestational weeks 24-41 of singleton pregnancies. None had previously undergone uterine surgeries. These participants completed their first cesarean deliveries at the time of study and were randomized into the following two treatment groups: single-layer closure with locking and double-layer closure with locking in the first layer, but not in the second layer (NCT03629028). However, the decidua was not included for treatment in either group. Participants were evaluated at 6-9 months after cesarean section by saline infusion sonohysterography to assess cesarean delivery scar defects. These procedures were conducted by experienced sonographers who were not aware of the uterine closure technique. Results Of the 225 final participants, 109 received the single-layer closure technique, whereas 116 received the double-layer technique. The niche rates were 37% (n = 40) for the single-layer group and 45.7% (n = 53) for the double-layer group (P = .22, relative risk 1.4, 95% CI = 0.8-4.4). Conclusions The single- and double-layer closure techniques did not produce different impacts on uterine scar niche development.