TR-Dizin Açık Erişimli Yayınlar
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10759
Browse
6 results
Search Results
Item Resting Heart Rate and Real-Life Treatment Modalities in Outpatients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Study: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational, and National Registry(2021) Cavusoglu, Yuksel; Kozan, Omer; Temizhan, Ahmet; Kucukoglu, Mehmet Serdar; 33960305; ABC-9349-2021Objective: Heart rate (HR) reduction is associated with improved outcomes in heart failure (HF). This multicenter, prospective, observational, and national registry aimed to evaluate resting HR and the impacts of HR-related medications in real-life clinical practice in patients with HF. Methods: The Resting HR and Real-Life Treatment Modalities in Outpatients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (REALITY HF) study enrolled 1054 patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <40% from 16 centers. Clinical characteristics, HR, and medications were noted (enrollment phase). A total of 487 patients with sinus rhythm and HR of >= 70 bpm were included in a further 4-month follow-up (FU) program (V0). Changes in HR and medications were reevaluated at 1-month (V1) and 4-month (V2) FU visits. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) was used to assess the quality of life (QoL) of 320 patients in a 4-month FU program. Results: During enrollment, 794 patients (75.3%) were in sinus rhythm, in whom resting HR was 76.7 +/- 14 bpm, 69.1% had a resting HR of >= 70 bpm, 79.1% were receiving beta blocker (BB), and 6.1% were receiving ivabradine. Resting HR was lower in patients receiving BB (75.8 +/- 13 vs. 80.4 +/- 16 bpm; p=0.001); however, 65.8% of those still had a resting HR of >= 70 bpm. A significant association was found between elevated HR and worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, worse QoL, or lower LVEF. During the 4-month FU, adjustment of HR-lowering therapy was left to the physician's discretion. Resting HR significantly reduced from 83.6 +/- 12 (80) bpm at V0 to 78.6 +/- 13 (77) bpm at V1 (p=0.001) and further decreased to 73.0 +/- 11 (73) bpm at V2 (p=0.001). Patients achieving a resting HR of >= 70 bpm were 21.7% at V1 (p=0.001) and 39.9% at V2 (p=0.001). KCCQ significantly increased from 59.7 +/- 23 (62.7) at V0 to 73.1 +/- 18 (78.5) at V2 (p=0.001). In addition, patients with NYHA I increased from 22.2% at V0 to 29.2% at V1 and 39.4% at V2 (p=0.01). Conclusion: In real-life clinical practice, elevated HR is highly prevalent in HF despite widely used BB therapy and is associated with worse clinical picture. Therapeutic interventions targeting HR significantly reduce HR, and HR lowering is associated with improved clinical outcomes.Item Management of Sacubitril/Valsartan Combination in an End-stage Heart Failure Patient Hospitalized for COVID-19 Pneumonia: Should we Withdraw Temporarily or Continue?(2021) Coner, Ali; Altin, CihanBackground: Many factors were blamed for the worse prognosis in COVID-19. Heart failure patients are thought to be under increased risk because of either immune-compromised basal status or possible interaction of viral infection with on-going medications, such as the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers. Sacubitril is a neprilysin inhibitor and its' combination with valsartan is recommended as a novel medication for heart failure. Case Report: A 71 years of age female with end-stage heart failure was hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia. She was under sacubitril/valsartan combination for the heart failure, and at the end of the first week of hospitalization, clinical and laboratory parameters recovered uneventfully. Sacubitril/valsartan therapy was continued without complications during the in-hospital course. Conclusion: Specific therapies for heart failure should not be withdrawn in COVID-19. To our knowledge, this is the first case report documenting the clinical progress of a COVID-19 pneumonia patient who was already under sacubitril/valsartan treatment.Item Snapshot evaluation of acute and chronic heart failure in real-life in Turkey: A follow-up data for mortality(2020) Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan; Aksakal, Emrah; Aksu, Ugur; Altay, Hakan; Nesligul, Yildirim; Celik, Ahmet; Akil, Mehmet Ata; Bekar, Lutfu; Vural, Mustafa Gokhan; Guvenc, Rengin Cetin; Ozer, Savas; Ural, Dilek; Cavusoglu, Yuksel; Tokgozoglu, Lale; 32120368; AAE-1392-2021Objective: Heart failure (HF) is a progressive clinical syndrome. SELFIE-TR is a registry illustrating the overall HF patient profile of Turkey. Herein, all-cause mortality (ACM) data during follow-up were provided. Methods: This is a prospective outcome analysis of SELFIE-TR. Patients were classified as acute HF (AHF) versus chronic HF (CHF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction and were followed up for ACM. Results: There were 1054 patients with a mean age of 63.3 +/- 13.3 years and with a median follow-up period of 16 (7-17) months. Survival data within 1 year were available in 1022 patients. Crude ACM was 19.9% for 1 year in the whole group. ACM within 1 year was 13.7% versus 32.6% in patients with CHF and AHF, respectively (p<0.001). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, beta blocker, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist were present in 70.6%, 88.2%, and 50.7%, respectively. In the whole cohort, survival curves were graded according to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) scores <= 1 versus 2 versus 3 as 28% versus 20.2% versus 12.2%, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis of the whole cohort yielded age (p=0.009) and AHF (p=0.028) as independent predictors of mortality in 1 year. Conclusion: One-year mortality is high in Turkish patients with HF compared with contemporary cohorts with AHF and CHF. Of note, GDMT score is influential on 1-year mortality being the most striking one on chronic HFrEF. On the other hand, in the whole cohort, age and AHF were the only independent predictors of death in 1 year.Item Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure therapy(2020) Cavusoglu, Yuksel; Altay, Hakan; Cahn, Avivit; Celik, Ahmet; Demir, Serafettin; Kilicaslan, Baris; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Raz, Itamar; Temizhan, Ahmet; Yildirimturk, Ozlem; Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan; AAE-1392-2021; 32281958Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are a new class of drugs for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) which inhibit urinary glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule of the nephron and result in glucosuria, natriuresis and diuresis. In large, randomized clinical trials, SGLT-2i have been shown to reduce major cardiovascular (CV) events and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with T2DM who have atherosclerotic CV disease or CV risk factors. In these trials, SGLT-2i is have their greatest and most consistent effect on reducing the risk of HF hospitalization. The reduction in HF hospitalization was also observed in subgroups of patients with a HF diagnosis at baseline, which raised the possibility of a clinical benefit of SGLT-2i in HF patients, regardless of the presence or absence of T2DM. In very recently published DAPA-HF trial, a SGLT-2i, dapagliflozin treatment on top of standard HF therapy has been shown to have clear clinical benefits in terms of reducing HF hospitalization, CV mortality, all-cause mortality and improving quality of life in HF patients. This compelling evidence suggests that SGLT-2i have a potential to be an effective treatment option in HF, regardless of diabetes. This article provides a comprehensive overview focused on the role of SGLT-2i in the treatment of HF.Item Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of acute decompensated heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation(2020) Kocabas, Umut; Sinan, Umit Yasar; Arugaslan, Emre; Kursun, Mustafa; Coner, Ali; Celebi, Ozlem Ozcan; Ozturk, Cengiz; Dalgic, Onur; Turkoglu, Ebru Ipek; Kemal, Hatice Soner; Gazi, Emine; Altin, Cihan; Zoghi, Mehdi; 32352420Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common cardiovascular diseases. The impact of AF on in-hospital outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is controversial. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of AF among hospitalized patients with ADHF and describe the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of these patients with and without AF. Methods: We examined the multicenter, observational data from the real-life data of hospitalized patients with HF: Journey HF-TR study in Turkey that studied the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of hospitalized patients with ADHF between September 2015 and September 2016. Results: Of the 1,606 patients hospitalized with ADHF, 626 (39%) had a history of AF or developed new-onset AF during hospitalization. The patients with AF were older (71 +/- 12 vs. 65 +/- 13 years; p<0.001) and more likely to have a history of hypertension, valvular heart disease, and stroke. The AF patients were less likely to have coronary artery disease and diabetes. In-hospital adverse event rates and length of in-hospital stay were similar in ADHF patients, both with and without AF. In-hospital all-cause mortality rate was higher in patients with AF than in patients without AF, although the difference was not statistically significant (8.9% vs. 6.8%; p=0.121). Conclusion: AF has been found in more than one-third of the patients hospitalized with ADHF, and it has varied clinical features and comorbidities. The presence of AF is not associated with increased adverse events or all-cause mortality during the hospitalization time.Item Natriuretic Peptides in Clinical Practice(2019) Cavusoglu, Yüksel; Alper, Ahmet Taha; Altay, Hakan; Celik, Ahmet; Demirkan, Burcu; Guvenc, Tolga Sinan; Kucukoglu, Mehmet Serdar; Nalbantgil, Sanem; Ozdemir, Murat; Ozin, Bulent; Sayin, Tamer; Yildirimturk, Ozlem; Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan; Zorkun, Cafer; 30860204; AAE-1392-2021; AAD-9938-2021Natriuretic peptides have long been introduced into clinical practice. These biomarkers have certainly been shown to provide useful information in the diagnosis, prognosis and risk stratification in heart failure and also may have a role in the guidance of heart failure therapy. Although, there are some limitations in using of these markers such as lack of specificity, aging, renal dysfunction or obesity, among the huge number of candidates for heart failure biomarkers, only natriuretic peptides are currently widely used in daily clinical practice in heart failure. Recent heart failure guidelines recognize natriuretic peptides as an essential tool in the new diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. Furthermore, natriuretic peptides are not only used in the diagnosis or prognosis of heart failure, but also these biomarkers are referred to have some potential role in primary prevention, cardio-oncology, advanced heart failure, assessment of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy, pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute coronary syndromes, atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease. In this article, natriuretic peptides have been reviewed for their updated information and new recommendations in heart failure and also potential role of these biomarkers in the management of various clinical conditions have been addressed in the form of expert opinion based on the available data in the literature.