TR-Dizin Açık Erişimli Yayınlar

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10759

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Item
    Analysis of Quality of Life, Depression, and Sexual Function in Patients on the Liver Transplant List
    (2021) Fidan, Cihan; Akdur, Aydincan; Kirnap, Mahir; Selcuk, Haldun; Yildirim, Sedat; Moray, Gokhan; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0002-8726-3369; 34609310; AAJ-8097-2021; AAA-3068-2021
    Background: I he only treatment in patients developing liver failure is liver transplantation. According to the Ministry of Health, the number of patients waiting for a liver transplantation is 2141, the average waiting period for liver transplantation is approximately 5 years, and 15-18% of these patients lose their life while waiting for transplantation. In these patients, limitations in daily activities and depression-anxiety are commonly found. The aim of this study was to analyze life quality, depression symptoms, and existence of sexual functional disorders of patients waiting for liver transplantation. Methods: A total of 74 patients, who were registered in Baskent University Hospital between 2015 and 2018, were included into the study. Short Form-36, Beck Depression Inventory, and Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale were applied to 56 patients who approved study. Results: Most of the patients were male (64.3%), and the mean age was 46 (18-64). Short Form-36 scores were low in all patients. The mean Beck Depression Inventory score of patients was found as 18.4 +/- 11.3, and they were suffering from moderate depressive symptoms. According to Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale, total mean scores of males was found as 16.3 +/- 5.5, and for females, it was 19.5 +/- 5.3 with a statistically significant difference (P < .05). It was found that sexual dysfunction mostly had moderate to mild. Conclusion: Depression and sexual dysfunction are common in patients with chronic liver diseases, and their life qualities deteriorate significantly. It is anticipated that evaluation of these patients in terms of psychological issues and sexual dysfunction will increase their quality of life during the organ waiting period and affect their well-being post-transplant.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Vascular Variations and Anastomosis Techniques in Renal Transplant Donors
    (2015) Haberal, Mehmet; Arer, Ilker Murat; Yabanoglu, Hakan; Caliskan, Kenan; Parlakgumus, Alper; Yildirim, Sedat; Moray, Gokhan
    Purpose: We aimed to share our experience about vascular variations and anastomosis tecniques in renal transplant donors. Material and Methods: 128 donor nephrectomy performed in our hospital between February 2010 and June 2014 were included in our study. Donors were retrospectively analyzed according to age, sex, comorbidity, operation history, site of nephrectomy, vascular variation and anastomosis techniques. Results: 21 (% 16,4) patients have left-sided, 19 (% 14,8) have right-sided and 13 (% 10,2) have bilateral vascular variation. 29 (% 21,2) unilateral double renal artery, 8 (% 6,3) unilateral double renal artery and vein, 4 (% 3,2) unilateral triple renal artery, 3 (% 2,4) early branching renal artery, 2 (% 1,6) unilateral double renal vein and 2 (% 1,6) polar artery are vascular variations observed. of 92 (% 71,9) recepients anastomosis type was end to side between renal artery and external iliac artery and end to side between renal vein and external iliac vein, 32 (% 25) end to end between renal artery and external iliac artery and end to side between renal vein and external iliac vein, 4 (% 3,1) end to side between renal artery and external iliac artery and end to side between renal vein and external iliac vein and end to side between 2nd renal artery and external iliac artery. Conclusion: Preoperative evaluation of renal vasculature of transplant donors is an important issue in means of decreasing peroperative vascular complications and decision for nephrectomy site.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    EFFECTS OF LOWER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT SURGERY ON SURVIVAL IN ELDERLY AND OCTOGENARIAN PATIENTS
    (2018) Aydin, Huseyin Onur; Avci, Tevfik; Tezcaner, Tugan; Karagulle, Erdal; Yildirim, Sedat; 0000-0003-3795-5794; 0000-0002-8522-4956; 0000-0002-3641-8674; 0000-0001-5225-959X; 0000-0002-5735-4315; S-8185-2018; C-6247-2017; AAD-9865-2021; AAF-1698-2021; AAF-4610-2019
    Introduction: Life expectancy has significantly increased in the last decade. The decision to perform surgery has always been challenging in elderly patients. We aimed to evaluate outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for lower gastrointestinal tract diseases and investigate factors influencing morbidity and mortality, particularly in octogenarian patients, and the effects of age on prognosis and survival in the postoperative period. Materials and Method: This study included patients aged >= 70 years who underwent lower gastrointestinal tract surgery; patients were divided into three groups as 70-75 years, 75-79 years, and >= 80 years. Age, gender, type of surgery, ASA score, length of hospital stay, morbidity, 30-day mortality, and overall survival were evaluated. Results: The surgery was performed to 598 patients due to lower gastrointestinal tract diseases. There was a significant increase in the ASA score with increasing age (Chi-square=35.472; p<0.001). The survival rate was significantly higher in patients with malignancies than in those with benign diseases, and in patients who underwent elective surgery than in those who underwent emergency surgery (p<0.001). When patients were examined according to age groups, the overall survival was similar across groups (p=0.217). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between octogenarian and younger patients for complications and survival. Thus, planned surgical interventions in elderly patients will not negatively affect survival and surgical interventions and can be safely performed in these patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Retroperitoneal cystic lesion mimicking malign sarcoma as a complication of lost gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    (2018) Aydin, Huseyin Onur; Soy, Ebru Hatice Ayvazoglu; Avci, Tevfik; Yildirim, Sedat
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Long-term and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    (2018) Aydin, Huseyin Onur; Ekici, Yahya; Karakayali, Feza Yarbug; Tezcaner, Tugan; Ozgun, Gonca; Yildirim, Sedat; Moray, Gokhan
    Objectives: The necessity of comparing oncologic results with the use of minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer has arisen. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the treatment approach in rectal cancer and to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for rectal carcinoma between January 2006 and January 2016 in our institution were evaluated. The results were compared between the two groups according to open or laparoscopic surgery. Clinical characteristics, preoperative and postoperative results, pathological examination results, and disease-free survival rates were compared after the surgical procedure. Results: A total of 121 patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 50 underwent open, and 71 underwent laparoscopic surgery. The median follow-up times were 56.75 months in the open surgery group and 55.2 months in the laparoscopic surgery group. Pathological examination revealed similar numbers of lymph nodes in both groups (p>0.05). The duration of hospital stay was statistically significantly lower in the open surgery group than in the laparoscopic group (p<0.05). The rates of disease-free survival were 74% in the open surgery group and 82.5% in the laparoscopic group, and no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in complication and recurrence between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in our study. The duration of hospital stay of patients was statistically significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open surgery group. Laparoscopic or open surgical options could be preferred according to the clinical suitability of the patient, experience of the surgeon, and resources of the center in rectal cancer treatment.