Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4809

Browse

Filters

2020 - 20212

Settings

Has files: NoSubject: search.filters.subject.Escherichia coli

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Evaluation of a Commercial Broth Microdilution Panel for Colistin Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae
    (2021) Mirza, Hasan C.; Bicakcigil, Asiye; Liste, Umran; Sancak, Banu; 0000-0002-8853-3893; 33978373; F-1232-2015
    Background: Colistin is among the last resort antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin is challenging due to its physicochemical properties. Broth microdilution (BMD) is the recommended method for colistin susceptibility testing. However BMD is not practical for clinical microbiology laboratories as manual preparation of BMD plates is time-consuming and labor intensive. Recently, some more user-friendly BMD products with commercial panels have become available. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of a commercial broth microdilution (BMD) product [Sensititre (Thermo Fisher Scientific)] for colistin MIC determination by comparison with reference BMD method using a collection of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates. Methods: A total of 323 unique patient isolates (102 E. coli, 221 K. pneumoniae) were included in the study. Isolates were stored at -70 degrees C and subcultured twice on sheep blood agar before testing. Colistin MICs of the isolates were determined using Sensititre (a premade BMD product with dried antibiotics) and an 'in-house prepared BMD panel prepared in accordance with CLSI guidelines' (reference method). MIC determination with Sensititre was performed according to manufacturer's instructions. The reference method was performed using untreated 96-well sterile polystyrene plates. Colistin MIC results were interpreted according to EUCAST breakpoints (susceptible, <= 2 mg/L; resistant, > 2 mg/L). Results: Overall susceptibility rate of isolates to colistin by reference BMD was 75.9%. Overall categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA), very major error (VME), and major error (ME) rates for Sensititre were 98.5%, 72.5%, 3.8%, and 0.8%, respectively. The CA and EA between Sensititre and reference BMD for the isolates with reference colistin MICs close to the susceptibility breakpoint (2 - 8 mg/L) was 94.2% and 48.1%, respectively. Sensititre yielded a VME rate of 15% and ME rate of 0%, respectively, for this subset of isolates. Conclusions: In conclusion, Sensititre showed high CA but low EA with reference BMD for entire collection of isolates. The VME rate was just slightly above 3% and ME rate was acceptable. The rates of CA and EA were decreased and the rate of VME was increased when a subset consisting of more challenging isolates was used.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Risk Factors for Urinary Tract Infection After Kidney Transplant: A Retrospective Analysis
    (2020) Tekkarimaz, Nihan; Ozelsancak, Ruya; Micozkadioglu, Hasan; Caliskan, Kenan; Demiroglu, Yusuf Ziya; Arslan, Ayse Hande; H, Mehmet; 0000-0001-5142-5672; 0000-0001-7631-7395; 0000-0002-0788-8319; 0000-0002-8767-5021; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 31424358; AAE-7608-2021; AAD-9088-2021; AAD-5716-2021; AAJ-7201-2021; AAJ-8097-2021
    Objectives: Urinary tract infections are the most common type of infections in kidney transplant recipients. They are also important factors for increased morbidity and mortality. The aims of this study were to evaluate the number of urinary tract infections, to identify possible donor/receiver-based risk factors, and to evaluate the impact of these infections on graft function. Materials and Methods: Medical records of patients who had undergone kidney transplant between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Our study included 145 patients (49 women [33.8%] and 96 men [66.2%]), with mean age of 35.2 +/- 12.4 years. There were 105 episodes of urinary tract infections in 55 of 145 patients (37.9%) during the first year after transplant. Female sex (P = .001), glomerulonephritis as primary kidney disease (P = .04), pretransplant diabetes (P = .05), and presence of ureteral stent (P = .03) were significant risk factors for the development of urinary tract infections. The most frequent pathogens identified were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Mean glomerular filtration rate at 12 months was significantly lower in patients with urinary tract infection than in patients without infection (80 +/- 25 vs 68 +/- 28 mL/min; P = .006). Conclusions: In kidney transplant recipients, urinary tract infections are common complications and have negative outcomes on graft function. These infections remain an important disease that requires frequent investigations and new ways of approach for prevention.