Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4809
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Atypical Glandular Cells in Papanicolaou Test: Which is More Important in The Detection of Malignancy, Architectural or Nuclear Features?(2021) Yucel Polat, Aysegul; Tepeoglu, Merih; 0000-0002-3590-9375; 0000-0002-9894-8005; 33606313; AAP-3975-2021; AAK-5222-2021Objective Atypical glandular cells (AGCs) in Pap (Papanicolaou) smears are uncommon but may represent various benign and malignant lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the AGC incidence in Pap smears, analyse the relationship between AGC and malignancy, and reveal the importance of architectural and nuclear features observed cytologically in malignancies. Methods Patients diagnosed with AGC on the basis of cervicovaginal cytology between May 2011 and July 2018 were included in this study. All slides were retrospectively reviewed and subclassified according to the Bethesda 2001 classification system. The cytomorphological features observed in the smears were recorded. Cytohistological correlations were evaluated, and the significant clinicopathological findings for malignancy were determined. Results Of 87 536 Pap smears, 195 (0.22%) had AGC results and 156 had tissue follow-up. Among the 156 smears with AGC, 80 (51.3%) were diagnosed as AGC-NOS (atypical glandular cells, not otherwise specified) and 76 (48.7%) as AGC-FN (atypical glandular cells, favour neoplastic). Follow-up biopsies revealed benign pathologies in 49 cases (31.4%) and malignant pathologies in 107 (68.6%). The rate of malignancy observed in AGC-FN cases (89.5%) was higher than the rate of malignancy in AGC-NOS cases (48.8%). Among the cytomorphological features, nuclear irregularity, presence of macronucleoli, feathering, loss of polarity, papillary pattern, and three-dimensional formation were found to be significant indicators of malignancy. Conclusion As AGC in Pap smear was associated with a clinically significant diagnosis in 68.6% of the cases in our study, we suggest that all patients with AGC should undergo further clinical assessment.Item Association between focal adhesion kinase and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression in prostate adenocarcinoma and their influence on the progression of prostatic adenocarcinoma(2020) Atilgan, Alev Ok; Ozdemir, B. Handan; Akcay, Eda Yilmaz; Tepeoglu, Merih; Borcek, Pelin; Dirim, Ayhan; 0000-0002-7528-3557; 0000-0001-8595-8880; 0000-0002-9894-8005; 0000-0001-6831-9585; 0000-0003-2898-485X; 32106037; X-8540-2019; AAK-3333-2021; AAK-5222-2021; AAK-1960-2021; AAJ-5689-2021Focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a member of the non-receptor cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase family, is associated with the development and progression of cancer. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is directly involved in the degradation of the extracellular matrix, and basement membrane components promote cancer cell migration and invasion. There is a functional interaction among FAK, MMP-9 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which leads to enhanced cancer angiogenesis, cancer cell invasion and progression of malignancy. FAK, MMP-9, VEGF and CD34-positive microvessel density (MVD) were examined in 100 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma using immunohistochemistry. The relationship among these proteins and their impact on angiogenesis and clinicopathological parameters were also evaluated. The FAK expression was found to be positively correlated with the Gleason score, WHO grade group, tumour stage, extracapsular extension and perineural invasion. The MMP-9 expression was positively correlated with the WHO grade group, tumour stage, extracapsular extension, positive surgical margin and lymphovascular and perineural invasion. The FAK expression was also positively correlated with MMP-9 expression and MVD. However, no correlation between FAK and VEGF expression was identified. The MMP-9 expression was positively correlated with FAK expression and MVD. Strong MMP-9 expression was associated with shorter disease-free survival. These results suggest that strong MMP-9 and FAK expressions play an essential role in the progression of prostate adenocarcinoma. Further investigations should be conducted to determine the importance of these proteins as therapeutic targets for patients with prostate adenocarcinomas.Item De Novo Malignant Neoplasms in Renal Transplant Patients(2016) Akcay, Eda Yilmaz; Tepeoglu, Merih; Ozdemir, Binnaz Handan; Deniz, Ebru; Borcek, Pelin; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0002-9894-8005; 0000-0002-7528-3557; 0000-0001-6831-9585; 27805524; AAJ-8097-2021; AAK-5222-2021; X-8540-2019; AAK-1960-2021Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of posttransplant malignancy in kidney transplant patients and investigate the clinical and histopathologic features of these patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed information on donor and recipient characteristics, patient and graft survival, and cancer incidence after transplant for 867 kidney transplant patients. Patients with neoplasms prior to transplant were excluded. A follow-up study estimated cancer incidence after transplant. Results: Neoplasms were diagnosed in 59 patients (6.8%), 41 men and 18 women; 22 (37.3%) had skin tumors, 19 (32.2%) had solid tumors, 10 (16.9%) had posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders, and 8 (13.6%) had Kaposi sarcoma. The mean age at the time of malignant tumor diagnosis was 42.7 +/- 13.6 years, and statistically significant differences were found between tumor groups (P < .01). The average latency period between transplant and diagnosis of malignant tumors was 99.8 +/- 56.9 months for solid tumors, 78.4 +/- 52 months for skin tumors, 64.5 +/- 48.8 months for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders, and 13.5 +/- 8.8 months for Kaposi sarcoma, with significant difference found between tumor groups (P < .01). Ten patients (16.9%) had more than 1 malignant tumor. Eighteen patients died, with a mean time to death of 31.5 +/- 22.8 months after tumor diagnosis. A significant positive association was found between survival and the number of tumors (P = .001); 5-year survival after tumor diagnosis was 81% and 40% for patients with 1 malignant tumor and patients with more than 1 malignant tumor, respectively. Conclusions: Malignancy is a common cause of death after renal transplant. Early detection and treatment of posttransplant malignancies is an important challenge. Screening these patients for malignancies posttransplant is crucial, and efforts should be directed to define effective immunosuppressive protocols that are associated with a lower incidence of malignancy.