Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4809
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Importance of Laparoscopy in Predicting Complete Cytoreduction at Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer(2022) Durdag, Gulsen Dogan; Alemdaroglu, Songul; Baran, Safak Yilmaz; Serbetcioglu, Gonca Coban; Ozmete, Ozlem; Ezer, Ali; Celik, Husnu; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-6659Purpose Laparoscopy has been used in evaluation of ovarian cancer to assess the extent and surgical resectability of the disease, and to avoid futile laparotomy, where primary cytoreduction is not suitable. Aim of this study is to investigate the contribution of laparoscopy in predicting 'no gross residue' in advanced stage ovarian cancer. Methods Data of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients, who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy for prediction of complete cytoreduction due to an alternative model, are analyzed retrospectively. Accordingly, in the absence of obvious mesenteric retraction or extensive tumoral implants on small intestine in laparoscopic assessment, cases were deemed surgically resectable, and the operation was continued with laparotomy to achieve complete cytoreduction. Clinical features of the patients, surgical details, complete and optimal cytoreduction rates, and perioperative complications were evaluated. Results Out of 243 patients with advanced stage ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer, laparoscopy was performed at 93 patients, 77 of whom underwent primary cytoreduction subsequently. Complete cytoreduction (no gross residue) and optimal cytoreduction (< 1 cm residual tumor) rates were 75.3 and 100%, respectively. None of the patients had suboptimal surgery. Morbidity and mortality rates were acceptable. Conclusion Laparoscopic evaluation prior to cytoreductive surgery can highly contribute to prediction of complete or optimal cytoreduction in suitable patients. However, experience and skills of the surgeon, as well as technical equipment of the center, may affect surgery; therefore, the model to predict residual tumor should be individualized according to the set up and the surgical team of each center.Item The clinical outcomes of ovarian cancer in patients with brain metastasis(2021) Simsek, Seda Yuksel; Guler, Ozan Cem; Durdag, Gulsen Dogan; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Gultekin, Melis; Yildiz, Ferah; Celik, Husnu; Erbay, Gurcan; Onal, Huseyin Cem; 0000-0003-3191-9776; AAK-7016-2021Objective: To present the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer with brain metastasis. Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective observational study. Patients' data were obtained from hospital records. Patients who were diagnosed with brain metastatic ovarian cancer in two tertiary referral centers between 2012 and 2020 were included in the study. Results: In total, there were 56 patients diagnosed as having brain metastatic ovarian cancer. The median age was 56 years, 91% of patients were at an advanced stage at initial diagnosis. The median time from the initial diagnosis to brain metastasis was 34.0 months. Sixty-seven percent of patients were determined as having multiple brain metastatic lesions. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) , stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and combined approach were utilized as primary treatment. The 1 and 2-year survival rates were 38% and 17%, respectively. Patient age and tumor histology were found to be significant prognostic factors that impact the survival in univariate analyses. The 1-year survival of patients aged younger than 55 years was 49.2%, and 28.2% for patients aged over 55 years (p = 0.04). Patients with nonserous histology had significantly longer one year overall survival compared to serous histology (61.4% vs 29.8%) (p= 0.01). Conclusion: The brain is one of the rarest locations for ovarian cancer metastasis. Radiotherapeutic approaches are the mainstay of treatment but survival rates are low. Age and tumor histology were determined as significant parameters that affected survival rates.Item RAB25 confers resistance to chemotherapy by altering mitochondrial apoptosis signaling in ovarian cancer cells(2020) Temel, Sehime Gulsun; Giray, Asli; Karaka, Bahriye; Gul, Ozgur; Kozanoglu, Ilknur; Celik, Husnu; Basaga, Huveyda; Acikbas, Ufuk; Sucularli, Ceren; Oztop, Sidika; Aka, Yeliz; Kutuk, Ozgur; 0000-0001-5653-6080; 0000-0001-9854-7220; 0000-0002-5268-1210; 32901335; AAJ-7911-2020; AAH-1671-2019; AAE-1241-2021Ovarian cancer remains one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death in women. Many patients with ovarian cancer suffer from de novo or acquired resistance to chemotherapy. Here, we report that RAB25 suppresses chemotherapy-induced mitochondrial apoptosis signaling in ovarian cancer cell lines and primary ovarian cancer cells. RAB25 blocks chemotherapy-induced apoptosis upstream of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization by either increasing antiapoptotic BCL-2 proteins or decreasing proapoptotic BCL-2 proteins. In particular, BAX expression negatively correlates with RAB25 expression in ovarian cancer cells. BH3 profiling assays corroborated that RAB25 decreases mitochondrial cell death priming. Suppressing RAB25 by means of RNAi or RFP14 inhibitory hydrocarbon-stapled peptide sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy as well as RAB25-mediated proliferation, invasion and migration. Our data suggest that RAB25 is a potential therapeutic target for ovarian cancer.Item Clinical characteristics of relapsed ovarian cancer patients with striking response to the bevacizumab at first relapse(2020) Kose, Fatih; Alemdaroglu, Songul; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Guler, Ozan Cem; Simsek, Seda Yuksel; Erbay, Gurcan; Onal, Cem; Celik, Husnu; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 0000-0003-4335-6659; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 0000-0002-0156-5973; 0000-0002-7862-0192; 0000-0002-1932-9784; D-5195-2014; AAI-8400-2021; AAC-5654-2020; G-4827-2016; AAD-6910-2021; M-9530-2014Background: Ovarian cancer is fifth leading cause of the cancer related death in women. Platin based doublet regimen plus bevacizumab is standard treatment in relapse. The primary aim of this study is to define clinicopathological characteristics of the relapsed ovarian cancer who derived unexpectedly long benefit from bevacizumab treatment. Methods: Total number of 106 patients with relapsed ovarian cancer and treated with bevacizumab (bevacizumab is not reimbursed as a part of adjuvant treatment in Turkey) on their first relapse were included. For the purpose of the study, the patients were placed into two groups, Group A and B, selected on the basis of the rate of PFS 1 (time between first day of adjuvant chemotherapy and first radiological progression) to PFS 2 (time between first day of second line treatment and second radiological progression). The patients included into Group A if PFS 1 greater than PFS 2 and Group B vice versa. Results: Group A and B were consisted of 67 (63%) and 39 (37%) patients. At a median follow-up of 32.1 months (5.3-110.8), 56 (52.8%) patients were died. Significant number of patients (78.4%) treated with primary surgery without neoadjuvant treatment and 59 (57.8%) out of the 102 patients had debulking surgery when their cancer relapsed. PFS 1 and 2 were estimated as 16.5 mo (14.1-18.9) vs. 13.7 mo (9.9-17.5) and 13.4 mo (8.0-18.6) vs. 29.7 mo (21.5-38.0) in group A and B, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Only parameter that show significant difference between groups was the rate of platin resistant patients; Group A: 13 (19.4%) out of 67 patients vs. Group B: 15 (38.6%) out of 39 patients with ap value of 0.041. Binary logistic regression indicates PFS1 is significant inverse predictor (shorter PFS-1 means greater chance of being in group B) of entering Group B [Chi-Square = 16.5, df = 6 and p = 0.011 (< 0.05)]. PFS1 is significant at the 5% level [ PFS1 wald = 4.33,p = 0.038 (p < 0.05)]. In multivariate analysis, cox-regression proportional hazard, cytoreductive surgery at second relapse (yes or no) (p: 0.028; HR: 0.3, 0.02-0.7, 95% CI) showed significant effect on PFS-2. On the other hand, platin resistance (< 6 mos; yes or no) (p: 0.04; HR: 4.0, 1.1-14.4, 95% CI) and secondary surgery outcome (no visible vs. visible) (p: 0.003; HR: 0.2, 0.07-0.58, 95% CI) showed significant effect on OS. Bevacizumab related adverse effects with greater than grad 3 detected in 13 (15%) and 10 (25%) in group A and B (p: 0.77). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that bevacizumab produced strikingly high PFS (over 24 months) in significant portion of relapsed ovarian cancer patients whom were mostly platin resistant cases with short PFS-1. This gain specifically achieved in patients who had aggressive secondary surgery with no-visible surgical outcome.