Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4809

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Comparison of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and well-controlled warfarin in octogenarians with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Real-world data from a single tertiary center
    (2021) Akgun, Arzu Neslihan; Karacaglar, Emir; Bal, Uğur Abbas; Ozin, Mehmet Bulent; 34236320
    Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice, and its prevalence increases with age. Nevertheless, data about the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) among patients with >= 80 years remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in octogenarians with non-valvular AF (NVAF). Methods: Medical records of 387 patients who were >= 80 years and diagnosed with NVAF in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with NVAF were divided into 2 groups (NOACs and warfarin), and the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were analyzed. Results: A total of 322 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up duration was 10.9 months for the NOACs group and 12.1 months for the warfarin group. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke/systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. A total of 220 patients were taking NOACs, and the most preferred NOACs were apixaban (53.6%), rivaroxaban (29.5%), dabigatran (13.2%), and edoxaban (3.6%) in this order. During a mean follow-up of 302.7 patient-years, the incidence of stroke or systemic embolic events was slightly higher among patients with warfarin but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.862). The incidence rates of major bleeding events were similar between the treatment groups (p=0.824). Conclusion: Our study revealed that the safety and efficacy outcomes are similar between the 2 treatment groups in octogenarians with NVAF.
  • Item
    Acute Coronary Syndrome In Geriatric Patients In An Intensive Care Unit
    (2021) Keskin, Suzan; Akgun, Arzu Neslihan; Ciftci, Orcun; Muderrisoglu, Ibrahim Haldun
    Objective: The advancing age of acute coronary syndrome and the ageing population are leading to an increase in the number of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome in our clinical practice. In our study, we aimed to investigate the effect of acute coronary syndrome in the geriatric patient group. Materials and Method: We retrospectively included geriatric patients who were in intensive care units because of different diagnoses, who also showed an acute coronary syndrome, and who had been diagnosed using the sequential organ failure assessment score. This score is used to describe the condition of a patient with sepsis and the extent of organ damage during treatment in an intensive care unit. We reviewed patients who were at Baskent University Faculty of Medicine between 25 March 2015 and 12 March 2020. Results: We included 63 patients aged 77.27 +/- 7.65 years. There were 40 (63.5%) males and 23 (36.5%) females. A total of 42 (89.4%) patients died in the first 5 months, one (2.1%) died between the 6th and 10th months, two (4.3%) between the 11th and 20th months, and two (4.3%) between the 21st and 30th months. We found a significant relationship between the sequential organ failure assessment score and mortality rate (p<0.05). The sequential organ failure assessment score was reliable in predicting mortality in geriatric patients with acute coronary syndrome, with 57% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Conclusion: Mortality of geriatric patients with acute coronary syndrome can be significantly determined using the sequential organ failure assessment scores.
  • Item
    The Effect of Renal Transplantation on Cardiac Functions
    (2020) Yilmaz, Kerem Can; Akgun, Arzu Neslihan; Keskin, Suzan; Ciftci, Orcun; Moray, Gokhan; Muderrisoglu, Haldun; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0001-8926-9142; 33229768; AAJ-8097-2021; W-5233-2018; AAJ-1331-2021
    Chronic renal failure is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular poor outcome. Despite advances in dialysis and renal transplantation, these patients still have high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the changes in blood parameters and echocardiographic parameters of patients undergoing renal transplantation in our center. One hundred and eighty-three patients who underwent renal transplantation between September 2012 and January 2016 were included in the study. Pre- and postoperative hemoglobin values, lipid profiles, ejection fractions, presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, presence of diastolic dysfunction, and valve pathologies were retrospectively scanned. Data were obtained from all patients in terms of blood parameters, but we compared 92 patients' echocardiographic data because of lack of both pre- and postoperative echocardiography records. In our study, 124 patients (67.8%) were male, and the mean age was 42.6 +/- 14.4 years. Hemoglobin levels (11.2 +/- 1.98, 12.7 +/- 2.2 mg/dL, P <0.001) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) values (37.6 +/- 10.5, 46.6 +/- 13.6 mg/dL, P <0.001) were found to be different significantly. In echocardiographic evaluation, there was no difference between pre- and postoperative ejection fractions in 92 patients. However, patients with preoperative ejection fraction <50% had a significant increase in postoperative ejection fraction (40.1 +/- 6.2, 48.4% +/- 9.4%, P = 0.012). Renal transplantation can improve left ventricle ejection fraction in patients with basal ejection fraction less than 50% and also provide a significant increase in hemoglobin and HDL levels in all patients. This suggests that renal transplantation may reverse the process for dilated cardiomyopathy and may improve cardiac function in patients with low ejection fraction. However, transplantation should be performed as early as possible in these patients.
  • Item
    Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience
    (2019) Yilmaz, Kerem Can; Akgun, Arzu Neslihan; Ciftci, Orcun; Muderrisoglu, Haldun; Sezer, Siren; Moray, Gokhan; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-9635-6313; 29025386; AAG-8233-2020
    Objectives: Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients on renal replacement therapy and in kidney transplant recipients. There are no specific recommendations for preoperative cardiac risk assessment before renal transplant. The aim of our study was to analyze preoperative cardiac test frequencies, test results, patient characteristics, and relations between cardiac stress test results and severe coronary artery disease. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively examined patients who underwent renal transplant between December 2011 and December 2016 in our hospital (Ankara, Turkey). Our study group included 216 patients. All patients had preoperative echocardiography. We recorded results of exercise stress tests, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, and coronary angiography. For all patients, preoperative complete blood cell count, creatinine, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, and red cell distribution width values were obtained and recorded. Results: We classified patient groups according to presence or absence of severe coronary artery disease. Fourteen of 66 patients had severe coronary artery disease. In univariate analyses, age, having a history of familial coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, presence of coronary artery disease, and triglyceride levels were risk factors for severe coronary artery disease. In multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus, presence of coronary artery disease, and having a history of familial coronary artery disease were statistically significant. Conclusions: Renal transplant recipients are a special patient population, and there must be specific suggestions for this population. If patients present with more than 1 risk factor, a stress test should be performed to evaluate cardiovascular risk. In some patients, especially those whose risk factors include prior cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus, stress tests should be skipped and patients should directly undergo coronary angiography to look for severe coronary artery disease.