PubMed Açık Erişimli Yayınlar
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10763
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Comparison of Acoustic and Stroboscopic Findings and Voice Handicap Index between Allergic Rhinitis Patients and Controls(2014) Koc, Eltaf Ozbal; Koc, Bulent; Erbek, Selim; 25667789Background: In our experience Allergic Rhinitis (AR) patients suffer from voice problems more than health subjects. Aims: To investigate the acoustic analysis of voice, stroscopic findings of larynx and Voice Handicap Index scores in allergic rhinitis patients compared with healthy controls. Study Design: Case-control study. Methods: Thirty adult patients diagnosed with perennial allergic rhinitis were compared with 30 age-and sex-matched healthy controls without allergy. All assessments were performed in the speech physiology laboratory and the testing sequence was as follows: 1. Voice Handicap Index (VHI) questionnaire, 2. Laryngovideostroboscopy, 3. Acoustic analyses. Results: No difference was observed between the allergic rhinitis and control groups regarding mean Maximum Phonation Time (MPT) values, Fo values, and stroboscopic assessment (p>0.05). On the other hand, mean VHI score (p=0.001) and s/z ratio (p=0.011) were significantly higher in the allergic rhinitis group than in controls. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the presence of allergies could have effects on laryngeal dysfunction and voice-related quality of life.Item Effect of Body Mass Index on Middle Ear Resonance Frequency(2018) Sozen, Miray; Oz, Isilay; Erbek, Selim; 29460823OBJECTIVE: Multifrequency tympanometry (MET) analyzes tympanograms obtained using different probe tones between 226 and 2000 Hz. An important parameter of MET is resonance frequency (RF). Studies have recently demonstrated that the RF value can vary depending on many factors. To provide new data regarding MET, middle ear RF values were investigated with regard to body mass index (BMI). MATERIALS and METHODS:This study included 78 volunteers (i.e., 156 ears) aged 18-40 years who did not have healing loss and whose otoscopic examinations were normal. Hearing thresholds were measured using pule tone audiometry, and RF values were recorded with immitansmetric measurements. The participants were divided into the following three groups according to their BMI: <18.5 kg/m2, Group 1; 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2), Group 2; and >25 kg/m(2), Group 3. The RE values were also analyzed. RESULTS: Although there was no significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 in terms of RF values, a significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 3 and between Groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: In the light of these data, BMI values should be considered when middle ear RF values are assessed.