Wos Açık Erişimli Yayınlar
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10754
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Cross-Sectional Analysis Of Tobacco Addiction In Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients(2022) Darilmaz Yuce, Gulbahar; Torun, Serife; Hekimoglu, Koray; Tuna, Derin; Sozbilici, Betul Rana; Cetin, Hikmet Oguz; Narlioglu, Mehmet Emin; Balli, Murat; Ozyesil, Ahmet Suheyl; Yavuz Colak, Meric; Ulubay, Gaye; Akcay, Muserref Sule; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0805-0841; 36164949; AAD-9097-2021Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has become an important health issue with consequences for special populations since 2019. Tobacco use is an important public health issue and tobacco users are a risk group for lung infections.Materials and Methods: The aim of this study is to obtain information about disease prevalence and severity, laboratory parameters, and changes in radio-logical findings between smokers and non-smokers who were hospitalized, followed up, and treated for COVID-19, and to find answers to critical questi-ons regarding the response to antiviral and supportive therapy. Two hundred eighty-six patients who were hospitalized and treated between March 2020-February 2021 in the COVID-19 Isolation Ward of Baskent University Hospital were included in the study. The patients were grouped as current smokers, non-smokers, and ex-smokers. The groups were compared in terms of symptoms, laboratory findings, radiological findings, and treatment respon-se.Results: The median age of the patients included in the study was 59 (IQR= 32). Of the patients, 40.6% were female and 59.4% were male. In our study, we discovered that there were fewer female smokers (p< 0.001). When the current smokers (n= 56), non-smokers (n= 159), and ex-smokers (n= 71) were compared based on their findings, it was found that dyspnea was more common in current smokers (p= 0.009). Lung involvement was found to be more common (p= 0.002) and multifocal in the current smokers group (p= 0.038). The levels of oxygen saturation at the times of admission and discharge were lower in current smokers (p= 0.002 and p= 0.038). The need for nasal oxygen and noninvasive mechanical ventilation was also found to be higher in current smokers (p= 0.008 and p= 0.039). Systemic steroid requirement was higher in current smokers (p= 0.013). There was no statistically significant differen-ce in terms of mortality between current smokers, ex-smokers, and non-smokers (p= 0.662).Conclusion: The analysis of the findings of the patients hospitalized in the COVID-19 isolation ward indicated that COVID-19 leads to a more serious course in patients with a history of smoking.Item Nowadays COVID underestimates the other suspects(2020) Esendagli, Dorina; Tek, Korhan; Yuce, Gulbahar Darilmaz; Hekimoglu, Koray; Ulubay, Gaye; 0000-0003-2478-9985; 0000-0002-0805-0841; 0000-0002-6619-2952; 0000-0001-8231-1475; 33295734; AAJ-4345-2021; AAB-5064-2021; AAD-9097-2021; ABF-9398-2020The whole world has been facing the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 infection and every day we still find out new knowledge regarding the disease. COVID-19 which is the name given to the clinical syndrome related to this infection has been shown to own a wide diversity of clinical presentations which challenges the healthcare workers and makes difficult the diagnosis and management of patients. Pulmonary embolism is also an entity that accompanies this type of infection and sometimes it is difficult to differentiate between the two. Here we present a patient who was admitted inward with typical lesions on chest tomography for COVID-19, but that turned out to be a submassive pulmonary embolism case without any infection. This case is remarkable because it shows that patients suspected for COVID-19 should be carefully examined and that pulmonary embolism can per se mimick the parenchymal lesions caused by viral infections.Item Value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease(2019) Akinci Ozyurek, Berna; Savas Bozbas, Serife; Aydinalp, Alp; Bozbas, Huseyin; Ulubay, Gaye; 31414640Introduction: Respiratory and cardiac functions in association with skeletal and neurophysiologic systems can be evaluated with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Compared to treadmill exercise test, CPET provides more comprehensive data about the hemodynamic response to exercise. Materials and Methods: We aimed to evaluate the relationship with CPET findings and coronary lesions identified on angiography in patients with angina pectoris who underwent teradmill exercise, CPET and coronary angiography (CAG). By this way we sought to examine the CPET parameters that might be predictive for coronary artery disease (CAD) before diagnostic exercise test results and ischemia symptoms develop. Thirty patients in whom CAG was planned because of symptoms and exercise test results were enrolled in the study. Oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), minute ventilation (VE), maximum work rate (WR), Delta VO2/Delta WR and O-2 pulse (VO2/HR) values were calculated. Significant CAD was defined as >= 50% narrowing in at least one of the coronary arteries. Results: The mean age was 60.4 +/- 8.9 years ve 21 (65.6%) of subjects were male. On CAG, CAD was detected in 19 (59.4%) patients. Maximum heart rate, heart rate reserve (HRR), VE/VCO2 measured at anaerobic threshold AT) and VO2 (mL/kg/min) were significantly differed in patients with CAD than those without (p= 0.031; p= 0.041; p= 0.028; p= 0.03 respectively). Peak VO2, VO2/WR and O-2 pulse values were higher in patients with normal angiographic results than those with CAD but the difference did not reach to statistical significance. Conclusion: The findings of our study indicate that among CPET parameters AT VE/VCO2, ATVO(2) (mL/kg/dk) and HRR can have predictive value in the diagnosis of CAD. We think that these parameters might be used in the evaluation of patients with angina and dyspnea suspected of CAD. In conclusion parameters obtained during the test that are not influenced by patient's effort might increase the value of CPET in the diagnosis CAD.