Wos Açık Erişimli Yayınlar

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/10754

Browse

Filters

20222

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Ozen, SelinSubject: search.filters.subject.Carpal tunnel syndrome

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Physical therapy versus radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized-controlled study
    (2022) Saglam, Gonca; Alisar, Dilek Cetinkaya; Ozen, Selin; 35949973
    Objectives: This study aims to compare the efficacy of physical therapy (PT) and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients and methods: Between May 2020 and July 2020, a total of 125 wrists of 95 patients (22 males, 73 females; mean age: 54.3 +/- 11.3 years; range, 19 to 69 years) with mild-to-moderate CTS were allocated into three groups. The control group (Group 1, n=42) was treated with splinting and an exercise program. Group 2 (n=42) was treated with a total of three sessions of rESWT, splinting and an exercise program. Group 3 (n=41) was treated with a total of 15 sessions of PT modalities, splinting, and an exercise program. Each patient was evaluated before, three weeks and 12 weeks after treatment using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) Pain Scale, and electrodiagnostic testing. Results: The reduction in VAS, BCTQ, LANSS, and improvement in sensory nerve conduction velocity were significantly greater at three and 12 weeks of follow-up in Groups 2 and 3, compared to Group 1 (p<0.001). A greater improvement was observed in all clinical parameters in Group 2, compared to Group 3 (p<0.001). Conclusion: This is the first study to compare the treatment outcomes of PT and rESWT in the treatment of CTS. The results of this study show that both PT and rESWT are effective in the treatment of CTS; however, rESWT yields superior treatment effects compared to conventional PT. The practicalities of administering rESWT and its efficacy in the treatment of CTS may make it the treatment of choice.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Ultrasonographic And Electrophysiological Outcomes Of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treated With Low-Level Laser Therapy: A Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Study
    (2022) Nalbant, Merve; Yemisci, Oya Umit; Ozen, Selin; Tezcan, Sehnaz; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0501-5127; 35949869; AAJ-8820-2021
    Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on clinical, ultrasonographic (US), and electrophysiological findings in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients and methods: Between January 2015 and August 2015, 42 patients (7 males, 35 females; mean age: 50.4 +/- 8.7 years; range, 32 to 65 years) with mild-to-moderate CTS were randomly assigned to one of two groups: active LLLT (therapy group, n=22) 0.8 J/painful point and sham LLLT groups (n=20). Both groups wore neutral wrist orthoses. The patients were evaluated before and after 15 sessions of therapy (670 nm, 4 J/session over the carpal tunnel). Follow-up parameters included the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) Symptom Severity Scale (SSS), Functional Status Scale (FSS), nerve conduction studies and US evaluation of the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA), vascularization (via power Doppler), flattening ratio (FR), and palmar bowing of the flexor retinaculum. Results: Nocturnal paresthesia improved in both groups; however, pain and patients with a positive Phalen's test reduced only in the therapy group (p=0.031). The FSS and SSS scores also improved only in the therapy group (p<0.001). Electrophysiologically, median sensory nerve conduction velocities showed a significant improvement only in the therapy group (p=0.002). The CSA, FR, and vascularization of the median nerve showed a significant improvement in the therapy group alone (p<0.001, p=0.048, and p=0.021, respectively). Conclusion: Improvements in the signs and symptoms of CTS and hand function, the improvements in sensory nerve conduction studies, and reduction in median nerve CSA, FR and vascularity in the LLLT group can be attributed to the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of LLLT. This study provides new US data demonstrating efficacy of LLLT along with a clinical and electrophysiological improvement. The LLLT seems to be an easily applied, non-invasive treatment option.