Başkent Üniversitesi Makaleler
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/13096
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Transplantation Activities in Iran(Başkent Üniversitesi, 2005-06) Broumand, BehroozIran is a tropical country with a land area of 1,648,000 square kilometers and a population of 68,100,000. Iran has a recorded history that dates back 2553 years. Its earliest medical school was Pasargad. Jondi Chapour University was founded 1753 years ago during the Sassanid dynasty as a center for higher education in medicine, philosophy, and pharmacology. Indeed, the idea of xenotransplantation dates back to days of Achaemenidae (Achaemenian dynasty), as evidenced by engravings of many mythologic chimeras still present in Persepolis. Avicenna (980-1037 AD), the great Iranian physician, performed the first nerve repair. Transplantation progress in Iran follows roughly the same pattern as that of the rest of the world, with some 10-20 years’ delay. Modern organ transplantation dates back to 1935, when the first cornea transplant was performed at Farabi Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The first living-related kidney transplantation performed at Shiraz University Hospital dates back to 1968. The first bone marrow transplant was performed at Dr. Shariaati’s Hospital in Tehran. The first heart transplant was performed 1993 in Tabriz, Iran. The first liver transplant was performed in 1993 in Shiraz. The first lung transplant was performed in 2001, and the first heart and lung transplants were performed in 2002, both at Tehran. In late 1985, the renal transplantation program was officially started in a major university hospital in Tehran and was poised to carry out 2 to 4 transplantations each week. Soon, another large center initiated a similar program. Both of these centers accepted surgical, medical, and nursing teams from other academic medical centers for training in kidney transplantation. Since 2002, Iran has grown to include 23 active renal, 68 cornea, 2 liver, 4 heart, 2 lung, and 2 bone marrow transplantation centers in different cities. In June 2000, the Organ Transplantation Brain Death Act was approved by the Parliament, followed by the establishment of the Iranian Network for Transplantation Organ Procurement. This act helped to expand heart, lung, and liver transplantation programs. By 2003, Iran had performed 131 liver, 77 heart, 7 lung, 211 bone marrow, 20,581 cornea, and 16,859 liver tranplantations. Sources of these donations were living-unrelated donor, 82%; cadaver, 10%; and living-related donor, 8%. The 3-year renal transplant patient survival rate was 92.9%, and the 40-month graft survival rate was 85.9%. Another large step in expanding the transplantation program is the construction of the Avi-Cenna (Abou Ali Sina) Transplant Hospital in Shiraz. This hospital hopefully will begin operation in 2 years. It will offer the opportunity for the exchange and sharing of organs and increased cooperation between transplant teams in the Middle East. The hospital offers great promise for transplant medicine in Iran and other Persian Gulf countries.Item Impact of Hepatitis C Virus Infection on Short-Term Outcomes in Renal Transplantation(Başkent Üniversitesi, 2004-12) Broumand, Behrooz; Hakemi, Monir Sadat; Sabet, Maryam ShafieiHepatitis C virus is an RNA virus with 6 known genotypes. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the world is almost 3%. In patients undergoing hemodialysis, prevalence of hepatitis C virus positivity is reported to be from 1%-54% depending on the methods used for detection. Liver disease in kidney transplant recipients has been attributed to hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, ethanol, hemosiderosis, and drugs such as azathioprine and cyclosporine A. Hepatitis C virus infection is currently the maincause of chronic liver disease in this group, and it may affect allograft outcome. Whether hepatitis C virus infection after renal transplantation adversely affects graft and patient survival remains controversial. Several series have reported no impact on short- and long-term patient and graft survival. In fact, comparative studies using different immunosuppressive protocols are not available. The differences in the results of these studies may be explained by confounding factors, for example, differences in immunosuppressive protocols, study design, methodology of diagnosing hepatitis C virus infection, and differences in hepatitis C virus genotypes. Treatment protocols for hepatitis-C-virus–associated liver disease should be considered before renal transplantation. Nevertheless, transplantation is the best option for patients with hepatitis C virus with end-stage renal disease, and less hepatotoxic immunosuppressive agents may decrease the incidence of posttransplant liver disease in patients with hepatitis C virus. This review will discuss the studies with specific emphasis on the impact of hepatitis C virus infection on short-term outcome in renal transplantation