Wos İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4807
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Comparison Of Clinical Characteristics Of Second And Third Peaks Of COVID-19 Pandemic: Effects Of Vaccination And Preventive Measures(2022) Ozdemir, Ozer; Arslan, Atakan; Bulbul, Hande M.; Ozdemir, PelinBACKGROUND: Understanding the differences in consequent peaks of COVID-19 may guide us for better predicting future disease characteristics. In this study, we aimed to compare clinical and radiological characteristics as well as out-comes of hospitalized patients with the diagnosis of COVID-19 in second and third peaks of disease.METHODS: We retrospectively included 303 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The study population was examined in two groups: patients hospitalized between October 2020 and January 2021 during second peak and patients hospital-ized between March and June 2021 during third peak.RESULTS: There were 171 patients in group 1 and 132 patients in group 2. The patients in group 2 were younger (64 +/- 13.27 vs. 56.02 +/- 15.39, respectively; P<0.001) and female proportion was higher (64.9% and 48.5% males; P=0.005). Smoking history and presence of comorbidities were less in group 2 (41.5% vs. 25.7%, P=0.008; and 78.5% vs. 59.1%, P<0.001) and symptom duration was shorter (median 7 days vs. 6 days, P=0.039). CT severity scores, LDH, CRP, D-di-mer, Ferritin, and creatinine levels were lower in group 2 (P=0.003, P=0.008, P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively), and mortality ratio was lower (N.=39 [28%] vs. N.=15 [11.4%], P=0.01). Duration of hospital stay and need for intensive unit care were similar across groups (median 8 days vs. 7 days, P=0.673 and N.=39 [22.8%] vs. N.=33 [25.2%], P=0.683).CONCLUSIONS: Although duration of hospital stay was lower in third peak, clinical severity scores and prognostic markers were lower compared with second peak. These may reflect the increased proportion of immunized people, and the effect of preventive measures.Item Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Kidney and Liver Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience(2020) Akdur, Aydincan; Karakaya, Emre; Soy, Ebru H. Ayvazoglu; Alshalabi, Omar; Kirnap, Mahir; Arslan, Hande; Ulubay, Gaye; Hekimoglu, Koray; Moray, Gokhan; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-0993-9917; 0000-0002-0805-0841; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0003-2478-9985; 0000-0003-2498-7287; 0000-0002-8726-3369; 0000-0002-4879-7974; 32519617; AAC-5566-2019; AAD-9097-2021; AAJ-8097-2021; AAB-5064-2021; AAE-1041-2021; AAA-3068-2021; AAD-5466-2021Objectives: The novel 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) was first described in December 2019 in Wuhan, China and subsequently announced as a pandemic on March 12, 2020. In several studies, solid-organ transplant recipients were reported to have higher risk for COVID-19. Here, we aimed to determine the frequency of COVID-19 in our kidney and liver transplant patients. Materials and Methods: Our study included 583 transplant patients who were admitted to our outpatient transplant clinics and emergency departments between March 1 and May 1, 2020. Seventy-four of them were liver transplant recipients (46 male, 28 female, of which 14 were pediatric and 60 were adult patients) and 509 of them were kidney transplant recipients (347 male, 162 female, of which 16 were pediatric and 493 were adult patients). We retrospectively evaluated demographic characteristics, currently used immunosuppressant treatment, present complaints, treatment and diagnosis of comorbid diseases, and results of COVID-19 tests. Results: Of 583 transplant recipients, 538 were seen in our outpatient transplant clinics and 45 were seen in our emergency departments. Of these, 18 patients who had had cough and fever were evaluated by respiratory clinic doctors, and nasopharyngeal swab samples were taken. One kidney transplant recipient had a positive COVID-19 test; he was followed with home isolation. He received treatment with hydroxychloroquine (400 mg/day). The other 17 patients had negative tests. There were no mortalities due to COVID-19. Conclusions: Transplant patients also got affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the data of our centers, this effect is not much more different from the normal population. We recommend that transplant recipients should be warned in terms of personal hygiene and should be closely monitored by organ transplant centers. If there is an indication for hospitalization, they should be followed in an isolated unit, with no aggressive changes made to immunosuppressive doses unless necessaryItem Incidence and Immunologic Analysis of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Hemodialysis Patients: A Single-Center Experience(2020) Arslan, Hande; Musabak, Ugur; Soy, Ebru H. Ayvazoglu; Azap, Ozlem Kurt; Sayin, Burak; Akcay, Sule; Haberal, K. Murat; Akdur, Aydincan; Yildirim, Sedat; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0001-8287-6572; 0000-0003-1511-7634; 0000-0002-5735-4315; 0000-0002-0993-9917; 0000-0002-8726-3369; 0000-0002-3171-8926; 0000-0002-8360-6459; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0002-8211-4065; 32519618; J-3707-2015; AAU-1810-2020; AAF-4610-2019; AAC-5566-2019; AAA-3068-2021; AAK-4089-2021; AAB-5175-2021; AAJ-8097-2021; R-9398-2019Objectives: COVID-19 is a great threat to the modern world and significant threat to immunocompromised patients, including patients with chronic renal failure. We evaluated COVID-19 incidence among our hemodialysis patients and investigated the most probable immune mechanisms against COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Baskent University has 21 dialysis centers across Turkey, with 2420 patients on hemodialysis and 30 on peritoneal dialysis. Among these, we retrospectively evaluated 602 patients (257 female/345 male) with chronic renal failure receiving hemodialysis as renal replacement therapy; 7 patients (1.1%) were infected with SARS-CoV-2. We retrospectively collected patient demographic characteristics, clinical data, and immunological factors affecting the clinical course of the disease. We divided patients into groups and included 2 control groups ( individuals with normal renal functions): group I included COVID-19-positive patients with normal renal function, group II included COVID-19-positive hemodialysis patients, group III included COVID-19-negative hemodialysis patients, and group IV included COVID-19-negative patients with normal renal function. Lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood and typing of human leukocyte antigens were analyzed in all groups, with killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes analyzed only in COVID-19-positive patients and healthy controls. Results: No deaths occurred among the 7 COVID-19-positive hemodialysis patients. Group I patients were significantly older than patients in groups II and III ( P = .039, P = .030, respectively) but not significantly different from group IV (P = .060). Absolute counts of natural killer cells in healthy controls were higher than in other groups (but not significantly). Activated T cells were significantly increased in both COVID-19-positive groups versus COVID-19-negative groups. Groups showed significant differences in C and DQ loci with respect to distribution of alleles in both HLA classes. Conclusions: Although immunocompromised patients are at greater risk for COVID-19, we found lower COVID-19 incidence in our hemodialysis patients, which should be further investigated in in vitro and molecular studies.Item What We Learned about COVID-19 So Far? Notes from Underground(2020) Esendagli, Dorina; 0000-0002-6619-2952; 32584236; ABF-9398-2020The novel coronavirus pandemic poses a major global threat to public health. Our knowledge concerning every aspect of COVID-19 is evolving rapidly, given the increasing data from all over the world. In this narrative review, the Turkish Thoracic Society Early Career Taskforce members aimed to provide a summary on recent literature regarding epidemiology, clinical findings, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and control of COVID-19. Studies revealed that the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus showed significant identity to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor is an important target of the SARS-CoV-2 while entering an organism. Smokers were more likely to develop the disease and have a higher risk for ICU admission. The mean incubation period was 6.4 days, whereas asymptomatic transmission was reported up to 25 days after infection. Fever and cough were the most common symptoms, and cardiovascular diseases and hypertension were reported to be the most common comorbidities among patients. Clinical manifestations range from asymptomatic and mild disease to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Several patients showed typical symptoms and radiological changes with negative RT-PCR but positive IgG and IgM antibodies. Although radiological findings may vary, bilateral, peripherally distributed, ground-glass opacities were typical of COVID-19. Poor prognosis was associated with older age, higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and high D-dimer level. Chloroquine was found to be effective in reducing viral replication in vitro. Likewise, protease inhibitors, including lopinavir/ritonavir, favipiravir, and nucleoside analogue remdesivir were proposed to be the potential drug candidates in COVID-19 management. Despite these efforts, we still have much to learn regarding the transmission, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19.